Quantcast

Friday, July 25, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

President's pot comments prompt call for policy

By Paul Elias

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 08:59 a.m. HST, Dec 15, 2012


SAN FRANCISCO >> President Barack Obama says he won't go after pot users in Colorado and Washington, two states that just legalized the drug for recreational use. But advocates argue the president said the same thing about medical marijuana — and yet U.S. attorneys continue to force the closure of dispensaries across the U.S.

Welcome to the confusing and often conflicting policy on pot in the U.S., where medical marijuana is legal in many states, but it is increasingly difficult to grow, distribute or sell it. And at the federal level, at least officially, it is still an illegal drug everywhere.

Obama's statement Friday provided little clarity in a world where marijuana is inching ever so carefully toward legitimacy.

That conflict is perhaps the greatest in California, where the state's four U.S. Attorneys criminally prosecuted large growers and launched a coordinated crackdown on the state's medical marijuana industry last year by threatening landlords with property forfeiture actions. Hundreds of pot shops went out of business.

Steve DeAngelo, executive director of an Oakland, Calif., dispensary that claims to be the nation's largest, called for a federal policy that treats recreational and medical uses of the drug equally.

"If we're going to recognize the rights of recreational users, then we should certainly protect the rights of medical cannabis patients who legally access the medicine their doctors have recommended," he said.

The government is planning to soon release policies for dealing with marijuana in Colorado and Washington, where federal law still prohibits pot, as elsewhere in the country.

"It would be nice to get something concrete to follow," said William Osterhoudt, a San Francisco criminal defense attorney representing government officials in Mendocino County who recently received a demand from federal investigators for detailed information about a local system for licensing growers of medical marijuana.

Assemblyman Tom Ammiano said he was frustrated by Obama's comments because the federal government continues to shutter dispensaries in states with medical marijuana laws, including California.

"A good step here would be to stop raiding those legal dispensaries who are doing what they are allowed to do by law," said the San Francisco Democrat. "There's a feeling that the federal government has gone rogue on hundreds of legal, transparent medical marijuana dispensaries, so there's this feeling of them being in limbo. And it puts the patients, the businesses and the advocates in a very untenable place."

Obama, in an interview with ABC's Barbara Walters, said Friday that federal authorities have "bigger fish to fry" when it comes to targeting recreational pot smokers in Colorado and Washington.

Some advocates said the statement showed the president's willingness to allow residents of states with marijuana laws to use the drug without fear of federal prosecution.

"It's a tremendous step forward," said Joe Elford, general counsel for Americans for Safe Access. "It suggests the feds are taking seriously enough the idea that there should be a carve-out for states with marijuana laws."

Obama's statements on recreational use mirror the federal policy toward states that allow marijuana use for medical purposes.

"We are not focusing on backyard grows with small amounts of marijuana for use by seriously ill people," said Lauren Horwood, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Benjamin Wagner in Sacramento. "We are targeting money-making commercial growers and distributors who use the trappings of state law as cover, but they are actually abusing state law."

Alison Holcomb, who led the legalization drive in Washington state, said she doesn't expect Obama's comment to prompt the federal government to treat recreational marijuana and medical marijuana differently.

"At this point, what the president is looking at is a response to marijuana in general. The federal government has never recognized the difference between medical and non-medical marijuana," she said. "I don't think this is the time he'd carve out separate policies. I think he's looking for a more comprehensive response."

Washington voters approved a medical marijuana law in 1998, and dispensaries have proliferated across the state in recent years.

Last year, Gov. Chris Gregoire vetoed legislation that would have created a state system for licensing medical dispensaries over concern that it would require state workers to violate the federal Controlled Substances Act.

For the most part, dispensaries in western Washington have been left alone. But federal authorities did conduct raids earlier this year on dispensaries they said were acting outside the state law, such as selling marijuana to non-patients. Warning letters have been sent to dispensaries that operate too close to schools.

"What we've seen is enforcement of civil laws and warnings, with a handful of arrests of people who were operating outside state law," said Alison Holcomb, who led Washington's legalization drive and helped write the bill that Gregoire vetoed. of

Eastern Washington has seen more raids because the U.S. attorney there is more active, Holcomb added.

Colorado's marijuana measure requires lawmakers to allow commercial pot sales, and a state task force that will begin writing those regulations meets Monday.

State officials have reached out to the Justice Department seeking help on regulating a new legal marijuana industry but haven't heard back.

DeAngelo said Friday that the Justice Department should freeze all pending enforcement actions against legal medical cannabis providers and review its policies to make sure they're consistent with the president's position. He estimated federal officials have shuttered 600 dispensaries in the state and 1,000 nationwide.

DeAngelo's Harborside Health Center is facing eviction after the U.S. attorney in San Francisco pressured his landlord to stop harboring what the government considers an illegal business.

"While it's nice to hear these sorts of positive words from the president, we are facing efforts by the Justice Department to shut us down, so it's hard for me to take them seriously," DeAngelo said.

The dispensary has a hearing Thursday in federal court on the matter.

——

Associated Press writers Terry Collins in San Francisco and Manuel Valdes in Seattle contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(14)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
serious wrote:
This is the perfect time to legalize pot---lame ducks--no elections for two more years. Think of the massive amounts of time and money that could be saved. Tax it and get some needed revenue.
on December 15,2012 | 05:22AM
allie wrote:
agree..go after meth
on December 15,2012 | 06:57AM
kainalu wrote:
The table has been set to finally repeal the draconian "Marijuana Tax Act of 1937". Pot wasn't even a drug until this Act. A simple google and quick study of the Act would lead most intelligent beings to conclude that pot is illegal strictly and solely for politics, and the greed associated with all things political.
on December 15,2012 | 11:17AM
MichaelG wrote:
If someone is looking for the gateway drug it's beer, wine, or any type of booze. Less violence with pot than booze. If you ask anyone using any controlled substance, the first mind altering experience was with some type of booze. It's time to make pot legal and put these growers out of business.
on December 15,2012 | 06:17AM
serious wrote:
I'll drink to that!!! What is interesting is that in WA state you can smoke it but you can't buy or grow it.
on December 15,2012 | 06:39AM
Highinthesierras wrote:
Legalize it, like the death penalty it simply costs too much. This approach should be expanded to all government - do a cost - benefits study and save dough. When you have a governor and president who smoke, why restrict the rest?
on December 15,2012 | 07:17AM
Mythman wrote:
The president should have to take a drug test before he can sign the kill list of who will be killed by drones next week.
on December 15,2012 | 08:50AM
Bdpapa wrote:
His reaction is irresponsible. He seems to be a person who closes his eyes whenever it fits his needs. Don't want to be the bad guy, you're in the wrong job!
on December 15,2012 | 08:56AM
HD36 wrote:
White refined sugar has caused more deaths than all drugs combined.
on December 15,2012 | 09:27AM
nodaddynotthebelt wrote:
Yet again we are so stuck on marijuana that we invest so much tax dollars to it that it is criminal. The money could be used to fight the real criminals, those that sell cocaine and other deadly drugs. As long as this goes on, the drug dealers will be enriched. We need to pull the rug from underneath the criminal underground by legalizing marijuana which would take away a huge portion of their income.
on December 15,2012 | 11:12AM
mcc wrote:
Amen!
on December 15,2012 | 02:29PM
PCWarrior wrote:
The truth is all drugs should be legalized. As long as you ain't driving, operating machinery etc. But it should not be criminal to want to get high.
on December 15,2012 | 03:53PM
PCWarrior wrote:
If Hawaii was smart they'd fight to legalize and market and tax to state benefit. One thing. Hawaii ain't smart.
on December 15,2012 | 03:51PM
Bdpapa wrote:
No, we don't need another legal intosoxicant. Too many safety and health issues. No worse healthwise than alcohol but too hard to test intoxication levels accurately. Miss a doobie once in a while.
on December 15,2012 | 03:56PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War

Political Radar
Climate change

Island Crafters
YouCanMakeThis.com

Warrior Beat
Empty pit

Political Radar
Switch

Political Radar
`Progressive hero’