Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Pardoned Hawaii woman to visit parents in China

By Oskar Garcia

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 09:08 a.m. HST, Mar 09, 2013

A Chinese immigrant who spent most of her adult life fighting to soften the fallout of a felony conviction in Hawaii plans to visit her parents for the first time in 22 years following an unusual pardon from President Barack Obama.

An Na Peng of Honolulu was convicted in 1996 at age 26 of helping immigrants cheat on tests to earn U.S. citizenship. Since then, the legal permanent resident has been fighting deportation proceedings, staying in the country with her family to avoid the chance they could be split up if she left. White House officials told her lawyer this month that Peng would be pardoned, clearing the way for her to regain full rights as a legal permanent resident.

Peng's lawyer, Maile Hirota, told The Associated Press that during that 17-year stretch, Peng always believed her case had merit.

"She never lost faith that she would win," Hirota said.

Through Hirota, Peng declined an interview with the AP. Hirota said Peng wants to maintain her privacy.

Peng was one of four employees arrested at Friendly Teaching & Testing Service, a company that tested immigrants in their knowledge of English, U.S. history and government as required for citizenship. Authorities said at the time that the employees guaranteed applicants they would pass the test and the company charged higher fees than other testers because of the promise.

Peng was convicted of conspiracy to defraud the Immigration and Naturalization Service and was sentenced to only two years' probation and a $2,000 fine — no jail. A federal judge called Peng a "minor participant" in the scheme and sentenced the company's manager to four months in prison.

Hirota, who didn't represent Peng during her initial trial, said Peng worked at the testing company two months and was remorseful about what she did.

"She didn't really understand the gravity of what she was doing," Hirota said.

Peng took the case to trial because she believed she had little to lose, and was told by prosecutors that even if she was convicted, she could still apply for a waiver from an immigration judge to avoid being deported, Hirota said. She had gotten married and legally moved to the United States five years earlier, and had two young children.

Hirota said the judge who sentenced Peng thought the fine and probation would sting hard for Peng without breaking her children from their mother.

But in an unexpected twist, immigration laws changed as Peng awaited trial and sentencing, putting her in danger of being deported and taking away her ability to apply a waiver, according to a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion last year. Immigration officials began the process of deporting her and Peng grasped at limited options — a struggle that continued until last year and Obama's March 1 pardon.

Hirota said Peng applied for the presidential pardon in 2006, the first year she was eligible.

She also took her appeal to the appeals court, which partially sided with Peng in March last year, allowing her to apply for a waiver and have her case reconsidered by an appeals judge.

Two months before that opinion, Hirota told White House officials checking on the pardon case that she thought it unlikely the court would side with Peng.

Beth Werlin, deputy director of the Legal Action Center at the American Immigration Council in Washington, said the pardon means nothing for other cases, but the appeals court opinion sets a precedent for other immigrants.

"It opens up the door for some people to plead their case," Werlin said.

Werlin said the number of cases affected now may be small, but Peng's case could help other immigrants later as immigration laws change and create unique circumstances.

Hirota said she believes Peng won the pardon — Obama has issued relatively few since taking office — because of the merits of her case. The White House didn't offer a reason for the pardon when it was announced along with pardons for 16 others in 13 total states.

But the pardon allows Peng to move on from a case that's hung over her head 17 years and caused financial stress for her family.

"She just wants to do what she always wanted" and pursue the American dream of raising her family and pursuing available opportunities, Hirota said.

Hirota said Peng is already in the process of applying for U.S. citizenship.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
808Cindy wrote:
Wow, what a story.
on March 9,2013 | 08:19AM
cojef wrote:
A human interest news about tenacity and fulfillment of dreams to remain in the US to be with her children. Tenacity equate to bull-headedness, can build character often times. Timing is perfect with the pending immigration reform that is being considered by Congress. Coincidence, don't believe so, in as much as her petition has been in the making for a long, long time. Congrats to Ms. Peng.
on March 9,2013 | 09:45AM
bender wrote:
The President was worng to pardon this lady for the crimes she committed. Obviously he doesn't understand how the public feels about all the monkeybusiness gonig to circumvent our immigration laws. Pardoning and handing out free citizenships only fuels more illegal activity.
on March 9,2013 | 10:28AM
Ronin006 wrote:
Agree. The lady should be deported now.
on March 9,2013 | 07:08PM
peanutgallery wrote:
This lady committed a most offensive of crime against our country. Obama should have never pardoned her.
on March 10,2013 | 04:53AM
Breaking News