Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Teen eyewitness testifies at Ohio rape trial

By Andrew Welsh-Huggins

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 09:40 a.m. HST, Mar 15, 2013


STEUBENVILLE, Ohio » A teenager was granted immunity from prosecution today before testifying he saw a friend perform a sexual act on a 16-year-old girl after a party in eastern Ohio last summer.

The judge granted Mark Cole immunity today in juvenile court before he testified at the trial of two high school football players charged with raping the West Virginia girl. Cole initially had invoked his Fifth Amendment right against testifying for fear of self-incrimination.

Testimony from Cole and two other teenage boys who watched the alleged attacks is a crucial part of the state's evidence because the girl says she doesn't remember what happened. Two of the boys took video and photos of the alleged attacks, then later deleted them.

Cole, 17, testified that he watched defendant Trent Mays digitally penetrate the girl in a car early in the morning of Aug. 12. He said he filmed Mays doing it but then deleted it, prompting a prosecutor to ask why.

"It was one of those moments when you realize you did something stupid and wrong that night, so I deleted it," Cole replied.

Cole testified he saw Mays unsuccessfully try to have the girl perform oral sex on him later that night in the basement of Cole's house. Cole also testified that the alleged victim was intoxicated and slurring her words.

On cross-examination, defense attorney Walter Madison suggested that the alleged victim was behaving no differently than anyone else the night of the party.

Madison, who represents defendant Ma'Lik Richmond, suggested that Cole was remembering events differently because so much attention was now being paid to what happened. Cole agreed with Madison's suggestions.

Mays, 17, and Richmond, 16, are charged with digitally penetrating the girl, first in the car and then in the basement of a house. Mays also is charged with illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material. The two maintain their innocence.

Prosecutors insist the girl was too drunk to consent to sex, while defense attorneys have portrayed her as someone who was intoxicated but still in control of her actions.

On Thursday, prosecutors introduced graphic text messages in which Mays gave differing accounts of what happened between him and the girl.

In the messages, the girl begged a friend for information about the night, saying she had no memory of the evening and feared she might have been drugged.

"Swear to God I don't remember doing anything with them," the girl wrote to the friend who authorities say saw the assaults.

"I wasn't being a slut. They were taking advantage of me," she also wrote to the same boy.

The texts also included ones in which Mays admitted that he digitally penetrated the girl. In other messages, he told friends he'd participated in a different, mutual sex act with the girl.

He also sent messages to his friends to try to get them to gloss over what happened that night. In a text to a boy who lives in the house where the second attack is said to have happened, Mays wrote, "Just say she came to your house and passed out."

Special Judge Thomas Lipps is hearing the case without a jury.

The case has riveted the small city of Steubenville amid allegations that more students should have been charged and led to questions about the influence of the local football team, a source of a pride in a community that suffered massive job losses with the collapse of the steel industry.

If convicted, Mays and Richmond could be held in a juvenile jail until they turn 21.

The Associated Press normally does not identify minors charged in juvenile court, but Mays and Richmond have been widely identified in news coverage, and their names have been used in open court.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(6)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
jess wrote:
Victim blaming at it's best. I hope they throw the book at these boys. Rape is rape. No is no. If she's too drunk to say yes, it's no.
on March 15,2013 | 09:29AM
ellinaskyrt wrote:
Exactly. We need to teach our boys that no means no and if she's no lucid enough to speak her thoughts clearly, that's a no, too. Men who think otherwise and/or use a woman's intoxication or altered mental status as an excuse to molest, assault, rape are far from being men indeed.
on March 15,2013 | 09:53AM
jess wrote:
It's not just men vs. women either, there are men who take advantage of other men and in some instances, even women who take advantage of men in these kinds of situations. I am so glad that someone else understands this, very refreshing!
on March 15,2013 | 10:32AM
romei wrote:
their lives will never be the same, truly disheartening~
on March 15,2013 | 10:16AM
cojef wrote:
When I was a teenager, things like this almost never happened. Kids today mature faster than back then.
on March 15,2013 | 11:22AM
patk wrote:
Is this kid Cole the guy who's mom is a state prosecutor? I've heard that this guy is one of the worst of the bunch and is known to have been doing this kind of stuff for awhile. His mom and the local cops have been covering for him, keeping him (and other football players) out of trouble with the law.
In this instance, the national attention has made it impossible to sweep things under the rug again, so I'll bet she arranged to have her son get immunity in exchange for ratting out all his friends.
I hope his former buddies exact their backwoods revenge on him before they go to jail, as he deserves as much punishment as everyone else. What a joke that he's going to get legal immunity.
on March 15,2013 | 01:46PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Warrior Beat
One last fling

Political Radar
Phased in

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Career Changers
Must Sea TV

Political Radar
HB 1700 — Day 4

Political Radar
Pass