Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 10 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Obama signs $633B defense bill

Bill includes a military pay raise

By Matthew Daly

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 03:57 p.m. HST, Jan 03, 2013

President Barack Obama signed a $633 billion defense bill for next year despite serious concerns about the limits Congress imposed on his handling of terror suspects and lawmakers’ unwillingness to back the cost-saving retirement of aging ships and aircraft. 

Obama had threatened to veto the measure because of a number of concerns, but relented because he couldn’t pick and choose specific sections. However, in a statement, the president spelled out his concerns about restrictions on his ability to carry out his constitutional duties as commander in chief.

Specifically, he complained that the bill limits the military’s authority to transfer third-country nationals being held at a detention facility in Parwan, Afghanistan. He also took issue with restrictions on his authority to transfer terror suspects from the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

“Decisions regarding the disposition of detainees captured on foreign battlefields have traditionally been based upon the judgment of experienced military commanders and national security professionals without unwarranted interference by members of Congress,” Obama wrote. 

He said the section of the bill related to detainees in Afghanistan “threatens to upend that tradition, and could interfere with my ability as commander in chief to make time-sensitive determinations about the appropriate disposition of detainees in an active area of hostilities.”

Obama promised when he took office four years ago to close the prison at Guantanamo, but congressional opposition from Republicans and some Democrats have prevented him from fulfilling that vow. The law limits his authority to transfer terror suspects to foreign countries or move them to the United States.

Obama insisted that he still believes that Guantanamo should be shuttered because operating the facility “weakens our national security by wasting resources, damaging our relationships with key allies and strengthening our enemies.”

The president said his administration will interpret the bill’s provisions and if they violate the constitutional separation of power, he will implement them in a way to avoid that conflict.

The law puts off the retirement of some ships and aircraft, and Obama warned that the move could force reductions in the overall size of the military as the Defense Department faces cuts in projected spending.  

The law includes cuts in defense spending that the president and congressional Republicans agreed to in August 2011, along with the end of the war in Iraq and the drawdown of American forces in Afghanistan. And it would authorize $528 billion for the Defense Department’s base budget, $17 billion for defense and nuclear programs in the Energy Department and $88.5 billion for the war in Afghanistan.  

The measure is about $29 billion under the current level, largely due to smaller amounts for Iraq and Afghanistan.  

The measure tightens penalties on Iran to thwart its nuclear ambitions and bulk up security at diplomatic missions worldwide after the deadly Sept. 11 raid in Libya.   

As suicides among active-duty soldiers have accelerated, the bill also allows a commander officer or health professional to ask if a member of the services owns a firearm if they consider the individual at risk for either suicide or hurting others.  

The bill includes a Senate-passed provision sponsored by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., that expands health insurance coverage for military women and their dependents who decide to have abortions in cases of rape and incest. Previously, health coverage applied only to abortions in cases where the life of the mother was endangered.   

The measure includes a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel. 

The legislated sanctions would hit Iran’s energy, shipping and shipbuilding sectors as well as Iran’s ports, blacklisting them as “entities of proliferation concern.” The bill would impose penalties on anyone caught supplying precious metals to Iran, and sanctions on Iranian broadcasting.  


Associated Press writer Donna Cassata in Washington contributed to this report.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 10 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Imagine what all that money could do if invested in building our nation instead of being the world's policeman and operating 700 overseas bases. Now remember we are borrowing this money from China and the expenditure of $633 billion/year is even more reprehensible.
on January 3,2013 | 04:18PM
RichardCory wrote:
Might actually have a decent country if we'd stop playing World Police.
on January 3,2013 | 04:24PM
Publicbraddah wrote:
China will soon, if not already, own us.
on January 4,2013 | 05:36AM
HD36 wrote:
Even China is wising up, and has stopped loaning the government money. Almost 90% of long term US Treasury Bonds are being bought by the Federal Reserve. They are loaning the government $45 billion dollars a month. Just imagine when they have to sell them, and no buyers show up. That's when we have our "Greece" moment.
on January 4,2013 | 08:14AM
jussayin wrote:
Well said
on January 3,2013 | 05:34PM
Bdpapa wrote:
The defense budget is a necessity. It's how they spend the money that bothers me.
on January 3,2013 | 07:51PM
Mana07 wrote:
Yep..you nailed it.
on January 3,2013 | 08:51PM
toomuchpilikia wrote:
Term limits and honest politicians is what we need!
on January 4,2013 | 04:48AM
kaleki wrote:
Yes!!!!! Term Limits
on January 4,2013 | 05:57AM
serious wrote:
Honest politicians--that's a oximoron!!!
on January 4,2013 | 06:03AM
Breaking News