Quantcast

Friday, July 25, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Giffords, Kelly launch gun control lobbying effort


POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 09:37 a.m. HST, Jan 08, 2013


TUCSON, Ariz. >> Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and her husband launched a political action committee aimed at curbing gun violence today as her Arizona hometown paused to mark the second anniversary of a deadly shooting rampage that left her with severe injuries.

Tucson residents rang bells at 10:11 a.m. — the moment a mentally ill gunman opened fire on Giffords as she met with constituents in 2011, killing six people and leaving 12 others injured. Mayor Jonathan Rothschild rang a bell at a fire station 19 times — one for each victim.

At the same time, two politicians on opposite ends of the gun debate held dueling weapons buy-backs outside a police station. Such events have been held around the country since the shooting at a Connecticut school that revived the gun control debate.

City Councilman Steve Kozachik asked people to turn in their guns for a $50 gift certificate from Safeway — the grocery store chain that owned the supermarket that was the site of the shooting. He wants to get guns out of people's home and bring pressure on politicians to change gun laws.

In response to the event, a Republican outgoing state senator gathered outside the same station and offered cash for guns. Several people waved signs and held up money to approaching drivers to announce that they will buy their guns.

Giffords also took a prominent role in the gun debate on the anniversary. She and husband Mark Kelly, a former astronaut, wrote in an op-ed published in USA Today that their Americans for Responsible Solutions initiative would help raise money to support greater gun control efforts.

"Achieving reforms to reduce gun violence and prevent mass shootings will mean matching gun lobbyists in their reach and resources," the couple wrote in the column. They said that it will "raise funds necessary to balance the influence of the gun lobby."

The move was hinted at in Kelly's recent comments that he and Giffords want to become a prominent voice for gun control efforts.

The couple last week visited Newtown, Conn., where a gunman opened fire in an elementary school, killing 20 children and six adults in December. They also met with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a billionaire who has spent some of his fortune in recent years on gun control efforts.

The couple was expected to discuss the initiative in an interview airing today on ABC News.

The network offered a preview of the interview Monday and during "Good Morning America" today. Kelly described a meeting with a father of a Connecticut victim in which he "just about lost it" after the parent showed him a picture of his child.

When asked by Diane Sawyer about when such violence happens to school children, Giffords responded: "Enough."

In the op-ed piece, Kelly and Giffords discussed what they deem lawmakers' inaction on curbing gun violence.

"In response to a horrific series of shootings that has sown terror in our communities, victimized tens of thousands of Americans, and left one of its own bleeding and near death in a Tucson parking lot, Congress has done something quite extraordinary — nothing at all," Giffords and Kelly wrote in the op-ed.

"This country is known for using its determination and ingenuity to solve problems, big and small. Wise policy has conquered disease, protected us from dangerous products and substances, and made transportation safer. But when it comes to protecting our communities from gun violence, we're not even trying — and for the worst of reasons."

They hope to start a national conversation about gun violence and raise funds for political activity, so "legislators will no longer have reason to fear the gun lobby."

As a House member, Giffords was a centrist Democrat who represented much of liberal-leaning Tucson but also more conservative, rural areas. She voiced support for gun rights and said she owned a Glock pistol. In the editorial, the couple mentioned they own two guns that are locked in a safe at their house.

At the gun events in Tucson, Kozachik said that as the shooting fades from the public's mind, issues like controlling the sale of large-capacity magazines and keeping guns from the mentally ill need attention.

Frank Antenori organized his own event, offering cash for guns and noting that a $50 gift certificate is way too low of a price for valuable weapons.

Antenori and Kozachik accused each other of acting out of political motivations. Antenori said the councilman was sullying both the Tucson and Connecticut school shooting victims by the timing of the buyback. Kozachik said the outgoing legislator was just trying to keep his name in the news and remain relevant.

Tucson residents held events over the weekend to mark the anniversary of the Saturday morning when Loughner opened fire with a pistol with a 30-round magazine that he emptied in just 40 seconds. He pleaded guilty in November and was sentenced to seven consecutive life sentences plus 140 years.

Rep. Ron Barber, then a Giffords aide, was shot in the thigh and cheek, and went on to replace his boss in Congress. He supports an outright ban on high-capacity magazines and a new federal assault weapons ban while acknowledging there are millions of both already in circulation that will remain there.

Barber planned to mark the moment of the shooting at a private gathering with staff and family members. He will also visit a hospital to thank doctors who treated him and other victims and attend an evening prayer service.

Daniel Hernandez, a former Giffords intern who at the time of the shooting helped save her life by trying to stop her bleeding until an ambulance arrived, criticized lawmakers for not doing enough since the attack. "There's no excuse for standing back and saying we're not going to do anything this time," he said.

"It's been far too long and there have been far too many deaths," he added.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican who vetoed GOP-sponsored bills twice in two years that would have allowed guns on school campuses and in public buildings, said Monday she's expecting more legislation in the wake of the Connecticut shooting, but she offered no suggestions.

"It will be something that I'm sure will be addressed in the Legislature and my ears are all open, and I'm certainly anxious if there is a solution that we get it done," she said.

___

Online:

http://americansforresponsiblesolutions.org/







 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(11)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Grimbold wrote:
This comment has been deleted.
on January 8,2013 | 04:37AM
boshio wrote:
However, gun control IS a serious matter and we need some changes. First, the feds should ban all auto military assault weapons, period. Second, the Feds should make owning a weapon more expensive by requiring that each weapon have a insurance policy in place for property damage as well as coverage for innocent murder victums. Same as each car is required to have insurance. Third, at the time of a weapons purchase, the buyer is required to conribute to a victums fund that is shared nationwide. Forth, weapon owners are solely responsible for any illegal acts with thier weapons, period.
on January 8,2013 | 10:02AM
yhls wrote:
It's unbelievable how stupid and simple minded these politicians are who want to take guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens. Any new laws will have zero effect on gun-related violence. It's amazing how politicians and the media look to treat the symptoms and not the cause of the violence. They should take all of these anti-gun advocates and send to Afghanistan to serve on the front line with our troops. They don't mind sending our troops overseas to fight, die and be mained in their battles. But here at home they want to take away the rights of law abiding citizens. They should live in a country where disarmed citizens have no right of free speech.
on January 8,2013 | 04:53AM
UhhDuhh wrote:
Where does it read they are taking the guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens?
on January 8,2013 | 07:26AM
hawaiikone wrote:
By not allowing me to buy one.
on January 8,2013 | 08:49AM
UhhDuhh wrote:
Where does it read they are not going to allow you to buy one? Am I missing part of the article?
on January 8,2013 | 09:13AM
Pocho wrote:
CRAZY, they should be cleaning up Chicago's murderous ways! 12 murders from Jan. 1-6 2013, that's 2 homicides per day. Clean out the gang bangers in Chicago
on January 8,2013 | 04:56AM
Pocho wrote:
What about Chicago? 12 murders in the 1st 6 days of 2013? They should be dealing with Chicago's homicides and it's thugs
on January 8,2013 | 04:56AM
kainalu wrote:
Just seen some sobering statistics related to guns and kids, including teenagers. Nearly 6K of that group over the past 2-years killed by guns in the U.S. Guns being the 3rd leading cause of death for that age group - children and teens. smh Not trying to be political, just considering those statistics as a father and grandfather.
on January 8,2013 | 07:53AM
Kaluu wrote:
We must do more to keep homicidal maniacs under control. Just received a copy of, "The Mad Among Us," which analyzes the tension between our efforts to be a just and humane society and the need to protect ourselves from violence. I'd bet that we need to backtrack on a lot of our unrealistic decisions made in our Sixties pipe dreams.
on January 8,2013 | 08:12AM
egghead wrote:
There has to be more gun control....doesn't have to be no guns...just less guns. Make gun ownership more expensive & w/ added responsibilities. Purchase of new weapons through licensed brokers only. Documented paper trail for ownership / possession of fire arms. Higher permit fees to cover random inspection of permitted guns & their proper storage. Penalty / fine if your gun gets stolen. Jail time if you do not report your gun stolen or if you are in possession of an undocumented firearm. Penalty equal to that of perp if your unreported stolen gun used in crime. Something along those lines....
on January 8,2013 | 10:25AM
tsboy wrote:
here we go. the anti gun lobby is going to try to deny law abiding citizens the right to own certain types of guns for now. we all know that their main goal is to outlaw all gun ownership by private citizens, for our own protection, of course. that is something that the UN is trying to make a law for all countries that are under the UN banner, including the US. there is no law in the books that says that the police have to protect you. and in most cases, they are not around to protect you. they arrive after a crime has been committed. so, we are on our own. that is why we need firearms, there are those in congress that not only want to ban so called 'assault weapons', but semi automatic pistols also. they want confiscation of guns already owned by lawful gun owners. that is why the gun lobby fights against more legislation. because for the anti gun lobby, it will never be enough until private gun ownership is banned for all Americans. by the way, there were some 33,000 Americans killed in car accidents last year. there were some 15,000 TOTAL murders last year. not all of these people were killed by guns. but say some 7000-9000 were killed by guns. what is more dangerous? cars or guns? almost anyone can own a car lawfully, even an ex convict. cars and alcohol kill more people than guns, yet no one bans them. all are a part of our society, whether you consider them good or bad. and all the consequences of owning and using them are something we will have to live with.
on January 8,2013 | 12:59PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War

Political Radar
Climate change

Island Crafters
YouCanMakeThis.com

Warrior Beat
Empty pit

Political Radar
Switch

Political Radar
`Progressive hero’