Quantcast
  

Sunday, April 20, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Governor: Fix public-lands law or consider scrapping it

By Star-Advertiser staff

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:49 p.m. HST, Jan 17, 2013

 2012 August 29 CTY - Some 25 or so members of hotel union Local 5 lined Beretania Street near Punchbowl on Wedesday afternoon to show their oppostion to the Public Land Development Corporation. Here, Local 5 member Amanda Ibanez shouted "Keep the Country Country". HSA PHOTO BY GEORGE F. LEE

Gov. Neil Abercrombie said today that he would consider a repeal of the controversial Public Land Development Corp. if the state Legislature is unable to adjust the law to satisfy public concerns.

"With many others, I believe in the legislative intent of Act 55 which has the potential to support using public lands for public purposes that otherwise will not have sufficient funding," the governor said in a statement. "However, after reviewing the information compiled by the DLNR and suggested rule and regulation proposals, I believe the administrative rules process may not be able to reconcile existing support with opposing views to the extent necessary to satisfy outstanding concerns.

“The Hawaii State Legislature may need to adjust Act 55 so that its good intention can be implemented appropriate to the goals of this law.  Public understanding and support are essential. If the Legislature cannot achieve this outcome, the possibility of repeal will ensue. I will take that outcome into consideration but we cannot walk away, should that occur, without a solution that moves us forward.

“As always, we will continue to work closely with the Legislature. We need to work together to achieve what is best for Hawaii.”

Abercrombie’s advisors have cautioned privately that the governor’s priorities, such as developing underutilized public school land to generate money to modernize schools for the 21st century, could be at risk as long as the debate is muddied by the PLDC.

The governor is expected to urge state lawmakers to focus on redevelopment opportunities at public schools, sources say. Lawmakers are discussing an education facilities trust that could lease public school land for commercial development, as well as a pilot project at a few school sites to test the concept.

The PLDC, the development arm of the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, was given broad exemptions from land use, planning and zoning laws as incentives to attract private developers interested in projects on underused state land. But the new corporation has not developed a single project — and has yet to adopt administrative rules — after vehement protests from environmental, labor and some Native Hawaiian interests.

Abercrombie had defended the PLDC last year after the protests over administrative rules, dismissing some of the more vocal opponents as the “usual suspects” who wanted to be the arbiters of state development. At one point, the governor said he would veto a repeal attempt.

But feedback from his advisors, and the steady opposition from environmental, labor and Hawaiian groups, led the governor in late November to urge the PLDC to slow down the administrative rules process. He said the future of the PLDC would be up to the Legislature, which had overwhelmingly supported the law in 2011.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(6)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Dear Governor: you need to advise the legislature to repeal Act 55. As presently structured it is a bad, bad thing for Hawaii. No matter how much you polish a turd, it remains what it is. Don't try and polish it....repeal and start over. The concept ain't bad but this time try not to fool the people and do everything transparently and with lots of opportunity for public input.
on January 17,2013 | 07:43PM
autumnrose wrote:
Talk about "Public schools" is a distraction from TRUE PURPOSE of PLDC, to exempt & expedite development around RAIL stations, transit oriented development. That's why don DelaCruz introduced & pushed BOTH TOD & PLDC legislation... That's why he was THANKED by HART board of directors for his TOD & PLDC work. I read about it in HART MINUTES (nov or dec 2011) but DelaCruz is shame now and doesn't want HART to call him TOD chair anymore.
on January 17,2013 | 10:10PM
autumnrose wrote:
PLDC is not needed for building all those skyscrapers in Kakaako anyway... that's being expedited by that other boatd, HCDA "Hawaii Community Dev. Authority."
on January 17,2013 | 10:16PM
Skyler wrote:
So scrap it already.
on January 17,2013 | 08:03PM
ichiban wrote:
Hey Gov Abby dismantle the PLDC. It was a bad program from the beginning. The perception I get of this program; It is a covert program to help developers sidestep zoning laws density and height laws, etc., to be used as a shortcut so prime public land can be exploited by the developers for profit.
on January 17,2013 | 08:08PM
NOTSHEEP wrote:
Repeal Act 55. if it is such a good thing, then it should stand the test of scrutiny and transparency by following the standard procedures of public hearings to get input from the community. The fact that it was snuck through the leg by stealth and underhandedness to avoid public input is a clue that it is a very bad bill that benefits only special interests. The authors of this Act should defend this bill publicly in an open forum against its critics and personally justify its public benefits and explain why it was passed in such an unethical manner.
on January 17,2013 | 10:33PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News