Quantcast
  

Saturday, April 19, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 16 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Obama orders $85 billion in federal budget cuts

By David Espo

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 05:49 p.m. HST, Mar 01, 2013


WASHINGTON >> Gridlocked once more, President Barack Obama and Republican congressional leaders refused to budge in their budget standoff today as $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts bore down on individual Americans and the nation's still-recovering economy. "None of this is necessary," said the president after a sterile White House meeting that portended a long standoff.

Obama formally enacted the reductions a few hours before the midnight deadline required by law. Yet their impact had been felt thousands of miles away well before then. In Seattle, the King County Housing Authority announced it had stopped issuing housing vouchers under a federal program that benefits "elderly or disabled households, veterans, and families with children."

The president met with top lawmakers for less than an hour at the White House, then sought repeatedly to fix the blame on Republicans for the broad spending reductions and any damage that they inflict. "They've allowed these cuts to happen because they refuse to budge on closing a single wasteful loophole to help reduce the deficit," he said, renewing his demand for a comprehensive deficit-cutting deal that includes higher taxes.

Republicans said they wanted deficit cuts, too, but not tax increases. "The president got his tax hikes on Jan. 1," House Speaker John Boehner told reporters, a reference to a $600 billion increase on higher wage earners that cleared Congress on the first day of the year. Now, he said after the meeting, it is time take on "the spending problem here in Washington."

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was equally emphatic. " I will not be part of any back-room deal, and I will absolutely not agree to increase taxes," he vowed in a written statement.

At the same time they clashed, Obama and Republicans appeared determined to contain their disagreement.

Boehner said the House will pass legislation next week to extend routine funding for government agencies beyond the current March 27 expiration. "I'm hopeful that we won't have to deal with the threat of a government shutdown while we're dealing with the sequester at the same time," he said, referring to the new cuts by their Washington-speak name.

Obama said he, too, wanted to keep the two issues separate.

Under the law, Obama had until midnight to formally order the cuts. Barring a quick deal in the next week or so to call them off, the impact eventually is likely to be felt in all reaches of the country.

The Pentagon will absorb half of the $85 billion required to be sliced between now and the end of the budget year on Sept 30, exposing civilian workers to furloughs and defense contractors to possible cancellations. Said Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, only a few days on the job: "We will continue to ensure America's security" despite the challenge posed by an "unnecessary budget crisis."

The administration also has warned of long lines at airports as security personnel are furloughed, of teacher layoffs in some classrooms and adverse impacts on maintenance at the nation's parks.

The announcement by the housing agency in Seattle was an early indication of what is likely to hit as the cuts take effect. It said it was taking the action "to cope with the impending reduction in federal funding," adding that it normally issues 45 to 50 vouchers per month.

After days of dire warnings by administration officials, the president told reporters the effects of the cuts would be felt only gradually.

"The longer these cuts remain in place, the greater the damage to our economy — a slow grind that will intensify with each passing day," he said. Much of the budget savings will come through unpaid furloughs for government workers, and those won't begin taking effect until next month.

Obama declined to say if he bore any of the responsibility for the coming cuts, and expressed bemusement at any suggestion he had the ability to force Republicans to agree with him.

"I am not a dictator. I'm the president," he said. "So, ultimately, if Mitch McConnell or John Boehner say we need to go to catch a plane, I can't have Secret Service block the doorway, right?" He also declared he couldn't perform a "Jedi mind meld" to sway opponents, mixing Star Wars and Star Trek as he reached for a science fiction metaphor.

Neither the president nor Republicans claimed to like what was about to happen. Obama called the cuts "dumb," and GOP lawmakers have long said they were his idea in the first place.

Ironically, they derive from a budget dispute they were supposed to help resolve back in the fall of 2011. At the time, a congressional Supercommittee was charged with identifying at least $1.2 trillion in deficit savings over a decade as part of an attempt to avoid a first-ever government default. The president and Republicans agreed to create a fallback of that much in across-the-board cuts, designed to be so unpalatable that it would virtually assure the panel struck a deal.

The Supercommittee dissolved in disagreement, though. And while Obama and Republicans agreed to a two-month delay last January, there was no bipartisan negotiation in recent days to prevent the first installment of the cuts from taking effect.

It isn't clear how long they will last.

Of particular concern to lawmakers in both parties is a lack of flexibility in the allocation of cuts due to take effect over the next few months. That problem will ease beginning with the new budget year on Oct. 1, when Congress and the White House will be able to negotiate changes in the way the reductions are made.

For his part, Obama suggested he was content to leave them in place until Republicans change their minds about raising taxes by closing loopholes.

"If Congress comes to its senses a week from now, a month from now, three months from now, then there's a lot of open running room there for us to grow our economy much more quickly and to advance the agenda of the American people dramatically," he said.

"So this is a temporary stop on what I believe is the long-term, outstanding prospect for American growth and greatness."

But Republicans say they are on solid political ground. At a retreat in January in Williamsburg, Va., GOP House members reversed course and decided to approve a debt limit increase without demanding cuts. They also agreed not to provoke a government shutdown, another traditional pressure point, as leverage to force Obama and Democrats to accept savings in benefit programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

Obama has said repeatedly he's willing to include benefit programs in deficit-cutting legislation — as long as more tax revenue is part of the deal.

"I am prepared to do hard things and to push my Democratic friends to do hard things," he said at the White House on Friday.

Republicans speak dismissively of such pledges, saying that in earlier negotiations, the president has never been willing to close a deal with the type of changes he often says he will accept.

___

Associated Press writers Robert Burns, Andrew Taylor, Jim Kuhnhenn and Darlene Superville in Washington and Manuel Valdes in Seattle contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 16 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(16)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
McB0B wrote:
Translation; If Americans don't agree to pay higher taxes we'll put the puppy to sleep and sell the baby's organs because there's no way we're going to let this be painless by cutting out wasteful things we do to get ourselves elected and sell our influence.
on March 1,2013 | 04:30PM
serious wrote:
According to Bob Woodward, it was the Messiah who proposed the Federal cuts. HE probably didn't have HIS teleprompter. Personally, I think it's a great idea--we can't spend more than we take in. If the parties can't make the tough decisions, auto cuts are okay!!!!
on March 1,2013 | 04:33PM
sumoroach wrote:
Obama does it his way or the high way this time he will get blamed for the sequester. It came out of the White House, It is all OBAMA FAULT. Obama can not blame anyone except himself. A plan that bACK FIRE ON HIM. A socialist and anti-colonialist who wish to break capitolist economy!
on March 1,2013 | 04:34PM
sumoroach wrote:
Obama promise during the debate that sequestering will not happen. What a LIE.
on March 1,2013 | 04:35PM
jussayin wrote:
Tired of Obama blaming others. He's the President, the CEO, the big boss. Gee, take some responsibility. Want to see results.
on March 1,2013 | 04:49PM
st1d wrote:
maxine waters, ever the humble one when sharing her massive intellect, stated that sequestration would place 170,000,000 american workers out of a job.

problem is that according to the labor department, there are only 140,000,000 jobs in america. perhaps she was referring to obama's america that has 58 states.

the silver lining in maxine waters' statement is that she and all the other democrats will be out of a job, too.


on March 1,2013 | 05:34PM
nodaddynotthebelt wrote:
Correction: She did correct herself and stated that 750,000 jobs are at stake.
on March 1,2013 | 10:57PM
808comp wrote:
Their all to blame. The president,Senate,and the House. How sad!!! I belive more women in congress mo better.
on March 1,2013 | 06:09PM
mytake wrote:
Obama the great divider. If this is the only way to get fiscal discipline, so be it.
on March 1,2013 | 07:06PM
kuroiwaj wrote:
Try think about what's going on. All President Obama gotta to do is present his budget to the Congress for them to review, debate, add, reduce, and approve so we have the U.S. Budget. It's the "Plan" for the Country. President Obama has failed as a leader and out President. What you think?
on March 1,2013 | 07:07PM
Bdpapa wrote:
You are absolutely correct!
on March 1,2013 | 07:24PM
Kuihao wrote:
I think you have no clue as to how the federal budget process works.
on March 1,2013 | 08:08PM
kuroiwaj wrote:
Kuihao, you'll be very surprised to find out I know a lot on how the federal budget process works. Maybe too much.
on March 2,2013 | 06:58AM
jussayin wrote:
US debt is $16,687,289,180,215.37 and counting. $6,000,000,000,000 since Obama took office. Ref: cbsnews
on March 1,2013 | 08:04PM
tiki886 wrote:
$85 Billion is only 9 days of Federal spending. The Feds are going to spend more this year than last year and they can't reduce the rate of spending for more than a weeks worth of spending?
on March 1,2013 | 08:51PM
Anonymous wrote:
Truly sad to think that all this is about controlling the GROWTH of spending.
on March 1,2013 | 09:17PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News