Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Groups renege on paying reward for capture of killer ex-cop

By Greg Risling and Tami Abdollah

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 02:08 a.m. HST, Mar 30, 2013


LOS ANGELES >> As a cabin smoldered with the body of rogue ex-cop Christopher Dorner inside, politicians in a city that lost an officer to his rampage approved a $100,000 reward for information leading to his arrest and conviction.

The Riverside City Council voted unanimously with little discussion and no debate, even after being told the fugitive's demise was likely to be announced soon.

News of the vote was dwarfed by Dorner's death after a week on the run, but the city made headlines this week when it said it wouldn't pay its slice of the massive $1.2 million that was pledged by more than two dozen entities and elicited hundreds of tips.

Blame the fine print — the requirement of an arrest and conviction — for the latest wrinkle in the battle over the pot of money that remains unpaid more than six weeks later. As a probe into who should get the cash continues, competing claims for the money have led to finger pointing, and at least two of the 30 groups that backed the bounty have bowed out of the tortured process.

A lawyer for the couple who called police after Dorner tied them up in their Big Bear Lake condominium and fled in their car shortly before his Feb. 12 death accused Riverside of reneging on an offer that was never genuinely made.

"The mayor knew full well that he wasn't going to be convicted when he authorized the resolution," said attorney Kirk Hallam. "It is completely disingenuous for him to stand up there now and say, 'Oh we weren't legally authorized to issue this.' Really? That's not what you said when you offered the ordinance to the City Council after the facts were already known."

Cobbled together quickly as the manhunt for Dorner went cold on a snowy mountain where he abandoned his truck, the reward was hastily announced over a weekend by multiple police chiefs and mayors. It was never formally put in writing and was offered before public boards were able to authorize the money or set conditions for payment.

No one expected the imbroglio that has followed as lawyers for two parties have sparred over who should get the reward. Officials are expected to announce the payout by mid-April.

While Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Police Chief Charlie Beck have said they want to the see the reward paid, at least one group other than Riverside has chosen not to pay.

The board of the 64,000-member union Peace Officers Research Association of California rejected paying its $50,000 share because Dorner, whose four victims included two police officers, died before he could be arrested or convicted, President Ron Cottingham said Friday.

Rewards have long been an important tool to crack unsolved crimes and smoke out criminals. Posters in the 1800s offered payouts for outlaws "dead or alive," inspiring vigilantes and bounty hunters to take the law into their own hands. Today, they focus on generating tips from people who may fear retribution and may want to remain anonymous.

The arrest of Boston mobster James "Whitey" Bulger, suspected of playing a role in 19 killings and atop the FBI's Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list, was nabbed in Santa Monica two years ago after a publicity campaign and $2.1 million reward drew a tip from a former neighbor.

Fine print can complicate matters. The requirement of a conviction guarantees that the right person ends up behind bars, but it can delay a payout for years.

Crime Stoppers, created in 1976 as a nonprofit, pays up to $1,000 for information leading to arrests. Money raised by donations from citizens and corporations has helped pay close to $100 million to tipsters — and that reflects only the 20 to 30 percent who claim the money, said Chairman John Lamb.

"I think the majority of people who don't ask for reward money are trying to do the right thing," Lamb said.

Hallam, who represents Karen and Jim Reynolds, said his clients deserve the money because they put police on Dorner's trail. Despite being bound and gagged, and told not to alert police, Karen Reynolds managed to call 911 to report that Dorner had fled in their purple SUV.

During the ensuing pursuit, Dorner crashed their vehicle and carjacked a pickup truck from Rick Heltebrake, who also called authorities. He also filed a claim for the reward.

Cottingham, president of the umbrella group representing California police unions, said officials first announced the reward was for "capture and conviction" and then just "capture" during the manhunt, causing confusion and the problems that now exist.

"Maybe we learned a lesson here to make sure the parameters are set before you start" issuing a reward, Cottingham said.

Riverside city politicians defended their decision to vote after Dorner didn't emerge from the cabin that burned to the ground after a gunbattle with law enforcement.

There were conflicting reports the night of the vote about whether Dorner's body had been found, said Councilman Mike Gardner.

"There was never an intent to authorize a reward knowing it wouldn't be paid," Gardner said.

Hallam said Riverside should consider reviewing a state law that provides for the governor to pay rewards in police officers' killings even if the arrest or conviction is "rendered impossible by an intervening event, including but not limited to, the death of the person during a pursuit by law enforcement."

Frank Zimring, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said the city of Riverside can legally not pay the reward, but it could hurt the city in the future.

"The problem is going to come the next time Riverside wants to get the public's attention by offering a reward, because the issue is really the community's long-term credibility," Zimring said.

While the city of Riverside has pulled its reward, the county specifically changed its reward language to assure it wasn't only symbolic.

The Riverside County Board of Supervisors met the day after Dorner's death to authorize their $100,000 portion. After some debate, the board voted unanimously for its approval, and to change the language from "arrest and conviction" to "apprehension."

"The bottom line is if these individuals were helpful to get law enforcement to put this issue to an end... then it should be offered," said Supervisor John Tavaglione during the meeting.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(9)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
saywhatyouthink wrote:
Cheap bas*ards
on March 29,2013 | 02:06PM
cojef wrote:
There's always a gimmick, "leading to the capture and conviction" . Chris Dorner shot himself , not captured or convicted. Thus, the reneging.
on March 29,2013 | 03:50PM
poidragon wrote:
It was all stated in 'the fine print' and that same excuse was used to deny payment of the posted reward for the 'Cop Killer!' Very convenient 'loop hole' in which to get out from the responsibility of paying the reward money. "Frank Zimring, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said the city of Riverside can legally not pay the reward, but it could hurt the city in the future." this comes down to government credibility, what happens the next time something like this happens, people will be less willing to do the right thing, knowing that the city government, flip-floped on the same subject before!
on March 29,2013 | 04:16PM
RichardCory wrote:
Yup. Next time I'm out in LA for business and there's another Dorner on the loose, LAPD better not expect any help for me after shooting up that van of two innocent women and then refusing to payout the reward to good honest citizens.
on March 30,2013 | 06:44AM
cojef wrote:
As a citizen, you have a community responsibility to aid law enforcement to promote public safety. It is similar to the "Good Samaritan" rule.
on March 30,2013 | 10:11AM
bender wrote:
Perhaps there is a person debt to society to report such crooks but that doesn't erase the promise of a reward. Once that offer was made then government should be obliged to fulfillit it. Mades one wonder if there was ever an intent fo fulfill it. If government wants the help of the citizenry then they need to maintain their credbility. The other can of worms is sorting out who might be deserving of the promised rewards.
on March 30,2013 | 12:49PM
patk wrote:
st*pid greedy people and lawyers fighting over money. If they were good people they could have agreed to split the money, or perhaps to donate the majority of it to the families of those who were killed. But no, the greedy scumbags just want it all to themselves. When it comes to money, most people are so pathetic.
on March 29,2013 | 10:59PM
bender wrote:
Get a grip, the story is about government reneging on a promise.
on March 30,2013 | 12:50PM
patk wrote:
Greedy sc*mbag losers and their attorneys.
on March 29,2013 | 10:59PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Warrior Beat
One last fling

Political Radar
Phased in

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Career Changers
Must Sea TV

Political Radar
HB 1700 — Day 4

Political Radar
Pass