Thursday, July 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Probe widens into IRS scrutiny of tea party groups

By Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 03:22 p.m. HST, May 14, 2013

WASHINGTON >> The Justice Department is investigating the Internal Revenue Service for targeting tea party groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax exempt status, Attorney General Eric Holder said today, widening a probe that includes investigations by three committees in Congress. 

Ineffective management at the IRS allowed agents to improperly target tea party groups, concluded one investigation, by the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. The inspector general's report, released today, lays much of the blame on IRS supervisors in Washington who oversaw a group of specialists in Cincinnati who screened applications for tax exempt status.

The report does not indicate that Washington initiated the targeting of conservative groups. But it does say a top supervisor in Washington did not adequately supervise agents in the field even after she learned the agents were acting improperly, enabling the practice to continue for more than 18 months.

Holder said he ordered the FBI to investigate Friday — the day the IRS publicly acknowledged that it had singled out conservative groups.

"Those (actions) were, I think, as everyone can agree, if not criminal, they were certainly outrageous and unacceptable," Holder said. "But we are examining the facts to see if there were criminal violations."

Three congressional committees already are investigating the IRS for singling out tea party and other conservative groups during the 2010 congressional elections and the 2012 presidential election. But Holder's announcement takes the matter to another level, if investigators are able to prove that laws were broken.

Holder said he wasn't sure which laws may have been broken.

The agency started targeting groups with "Tea Party," ''Patriots" or "9/12 Project" in their applications for tax exempt status in March 2010, the inspector general's report said. Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax exempt organizations, was briefed on the matter in June 2011.

Within days, she ordered agents to change the criteria for singling out groups to a more generic "organizations involved with political, lobbying, or advocacy." But by January 2012, agents started singling out groups that promoted the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Agents made the changes "without executive approval because they believed the July 2011 criteria were too broad," the report said.

IRS agents were trying to determine whether the political activities of such groups disqualified them for tax-exempt status. These groups were claiming tax-exempt status as organizations promoting social welfare. Unlike other charitable groups, they can engage in political activity. But politics cannot be their primary mission.

It is up to the IRS to make the determination.

But by using improper criteria, the IRS targeted some groups, even though there were no indications that they engaged in significant political activities, the report said. Other non-tea party groups that had significant political activities were not screened, the report said.

"The criteria developed by the Determinations Unit gives the appearance that the IRS is not impartial in conducting its mission," the report said.

In all, IRS agents identified 298 applications for additional, sometimes burdensome scrutiny. Ninety-one of them were tea party, patriot or 9/12 groups, the report said.

Of the tea party groups, 17 should not have been targeted because they did not indicate that they were engaged in significant political activities, investigators concluded. 

The additional screening resulted in long delays as IRS agents asked intrusive, sometimes inappropriate questions, or merely let applications languish, the report said. Inappropriate questions included requests for lists of donors and the political affiliation of officers.

As of December, the delays averaged 574 days, which probably made donors reluctant to contribute, the report said. No group has had their application denied, though about half are still waiting, the IRS said.

House Oversight Committee chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said that report "magnifies our concerns about the breadth and depth" of the IRS's targeting of certain groups.

"Unfortunately, the report raises more questions than it answers," Issa said. "What we do know for sure is that the IRS personnel responsible for granting tax exemptions systematically targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny, and that officials in Washington, D.C. were aware of this practice, even while publically claiming that it never happened."

The practice ended in May 2012, when the criteria for additional scrutiny was changed to "organizations with indicators of significant amounts of political campaign intervention (raising questions as to exempt purpose and/or excess private benefit)," the report said.

"After seeing issues with particular cases, inappropriate shortcuts were used to determine which cases may be engaging in political activities," the IRS said in a statement this evening. "It is important to note that the vast majority of these cases would still have been centralized based on the general criteria used for other cases."

"It is also important to understand that the group of centralized cases included organizations of all political views," the statement said.

The IRS has said the improper reviews were limited to a Cincinnati office where a special team was assembled to screen them. The inspector general's report does not contradict the agency on this assertion.

However, documents obtained by The Associated Press suggest the targeting of conservative groups could be more widespread. Documents sent from the IRS to tea party groups show that IRS offices in California and Washington, D.C., also sought extensive information from tea party groups who requested tax-exempt status.

In letters provided by the American Center for Law and Justice, which represents 27 tea party groups that have sought tax exempt status, IRS officials from two cities in California — El Monte and Laguna Nigel —  as well as officials in Washington, D.C., and Cincinnati contacted groups seeking extensive information.

The law center's chief counsel, Jay Sekulow, said he was astonished the IRS said activity was limited to Cincinnati.

"To me, that was what was mind-boggling, they tried to create a narrative," he said.

On Monday, the IRS said acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller was first informed on May, 3, 2012, that applications for tax-exempt status by tea party groups were inappropriately singled out for extra scrutiny.

At least twice after the briefing, Miller wrote letters to members of Congress to explain the process of reviewing applications for tax-exempt status without disclosing that tea party groups had been targeted. On July 25, 2012, Miller testified before the House Ways and Means oversight subcommittee but again did not mention the additional scrutiny — despite being asked about it.

Today, the IRS said, "While flaws in our process were corrected last year based on our own review, we only recently discussed this publicly as there had been a concurrent ongoing (inspector general) audit of the situation. There was no intent to hide this issue, but rather we waited until (the inspector general) completed their fact finding, made recommendations, and we reviewed their findings. 

Miller was a deputy commissioner at the time. He became acting commissioner in November, after Commissioner Douglas Shulman completed his five-year term. Shulman had been appointed by President George W. Bush.

Miller is scheduled to testify before the House Ways and Means Committee at a hearing Friday.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
palani wrote:
The Article 2, Impeachment Count 1 against then President Nixon involved misusing the IRS to pursue those on his enemies list. From http://classes.lls.edu/archive/manheimk/371d1/nixonarticles.html

He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposed not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be initiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

Now that this despot has, perhaps irreversibly, antagonized his Palace Guard, the mainstream press, how long will the truth be suppressed?

on May 14,2013 | 02:34PM
kuroiwaj wrote:
Palani, this action by Pres. Obama's administration with him where the buck stops may end as you believe. Let's go through the hearings process to find the truth and if it comes from the President the process of impeachment is clear. Together with Benghzi, the AP records, and others that will be breaking, you may get your wish. Obamacare and HHS, Corporations and DoL, Americans and EPA, etc. it will be interesting.
on May 14,2013 | 02:45PM
Pacej001 wrote:
Hate to even hear the "I" word at this point. I hope the Republicans restrain themselves in that regard and just let the facts (and a relentless investigation) go where they will toward the truth.
on May 14,2013 | 03:53PM
rhs763 wrote:
There should be termination in store for those who abused or authorized abuse of their authority. Not just the IRS, but all government agencies. Further, even though not stated in black and white, those in upper management should not be allowed to engage in questionable activities. After all, they are the ones who are supposed to understand the intent and purpose of their respective departments' regulations, and lead accordingly. If anthing is questionable, rulings should be requested before any action. Letting staff with questionable activities retire with no repercussion is simply betraying the trust of the public and theft from the public.
on May 14,2013 | 03:12PM
Compassionate_Cat wrote:
The list of contributors to these organizations needs to be compared to IRS audits. As a matter of fairness it is impossible to say that the IRS did not target individuals contributing to these groups and therefore have their rights been violated. Do you know how bad it sounds to say that they went after groups who support America's Bill of Rights??? Our whole system of "steal from the citizens and give to the rich" really needs to stop.
on May 14,2013 | 03:16PM
Pacej001 wrote:
Let's play connect the dots: 1. ATF permits movement of automatic weapons into Mexico with no way to track interdict them once across the border: Hundreds of Mexicans dead. 2. The head of the EPA and key staff have a phantom email system with fake names in order to avoid public and Congressional scrutiny. 3. The Obama administration obscures/hides/lies about the Al Qaeda terrorist connection in the Benghazi attack, evidently to minimize political impact before a close election. 4. IRS targets conservative groups and others opposed to Administration policies. 5. EPA allegedly obstructs FOIA requests from conservative groups while facilitating those made by favored environmental groups. 6. The Dept of Justice initiates an unprecedented sweep of Associated Press telephone records as part of a leak investigation, casting a shadow on freedom of the press.----- Looks like a pattern is forming to me. At the very least, we're seeing the results of a hyper partisan leadership environment. That's what happens in large organizations, they take on the character of the top leadership.
on May 14,2013 | 05:55PM
Breaking News