comscore Defense argues state did not prove suspect intended to kill in hammer attack | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Defense argues state did not prove suspect intended to kill in hammer attack

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now

HILO >> The defense attorney for a Hilo man charged with trying to kill a coin dealer with a hammer says the state didn’t prove its case.

In closing arguments Tuesday, William Heflin said defendant Robert Diego has no history of violence, in contrast to the man he’s charged with trying to kill, Donald Nigro.

Diego claims he hit Nigro with a hammer only after Nigro sexually groped him.

Heflin says Nigro, who was convicted of murder in 1971, was more likely to be the aggressor.

Prosecutors contend Diego intended to rob Nigro. Deputy Prosecutor Darien Nagata called Diego’s testimony an outrageous story concocted to explain the June 13, 2011 hammer attack.

The Hawaii Tribune-Herald reports the prosecution Wednesday will have a chance for rebuttal before the case goes to jury.

Comments have been disabled for this story...

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up