Wednesday, July 30, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

SF Bay Area transit more crowded with train strike

By Mihir Zaveri & Terry Collins

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 05:17 a.m. HST, Jul 01, 2013

OAKLAND, Calif. » San Francisco Bay area commuters got out the door earlier than usual today and encountered crowded roads and public transit after Bay Area Rapid Transit train workers went on strike.

Two of BART's largest unions went on strike after their contract expired the previous night, halting train service for the first time in 16 years.

The walkout promised to derail the more than 400,000 riders who use the nation's fifth-largest rail system and affect every mode of transportation. Transportation officials said another 60,000 vehicles could be on the road, clogging highways and bridges throughout the Bay Area.

Traffic leading up to the toll plaza of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge was heavier than usual early today. People also lined up early to take buses that were leaving from a few Bay Area Rapid Transit stations.

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit buses into San Francisco were carrying more passengers, riders and bus drivers said.

"It's pretty crazy," said Young Choi, 34. "It's creating a pretty chaotic feeling in terms of the commute situation."

Choi, an architect at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP in San Francisco's financial district, got dropped off by a friend in Berkeley from Walnut Creek around 6:30 a.m. today so he could catch the bus after hearing about the strike.

Normally, he'd leave later but was navigating a new route so he wanted to get an earlier start.

Still, early reports indicated a less chaotic morning commute than had been feared.

The strike was called after an 11th-hour effort to resume negotiation failed to produce a new contract by the deadline of midnight Sunday. Both the unions and management said they were far apart on key sticking points including salary, pensions, health care and safety.

"A strike is always the last resort and we have done everything in our power to avoid it," said Josie Mooney, a negotiator for Service Employees International Union Local 1021.

"Our members aren't interested in disrupting the Bay Area, but management has put us in a position where we have no choice," said Antonette Bryant, president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1555.

Negotiations fell apart Saturday and the unions walked away from the table. California Gov. Jerry Brown's office had urged both sides to resume discussions Sunday with rush hour on the horizon.

But talks between the two sides came to an end Sunday night with BART accusing negotiators of walking away from the bargaining table, while the SEIU countered in a statement that management "threw in the towel."

The unions, which represent nearly 2,400 train operators, station agents, mechanics, maintenance workers and professional staff, were asking for a 5 percent raise each year over the next three years. BART said that train operators and station agents in the unions average about $71,000 in base salary and $11,000 in overtime annually. The workers also pay a flat $92 monthly fee for health insurance.

BART spokesman Rick Rice said the agency had up its original offer of a 4 percent pay rise over the next four years to 8 percent. The proposed salary increase is on top of a 1 percent raise employees were scheduled to receive today, Rice added.

The transit agency also said it offered to reduce the contribution employees would have to make to their pensions, and lower the costs of health care premiums they would have to pay.

Bryant said Sunday that BART's latest proposal is not an actual pay increase, calling it "surface bargaining."

BART's last strike lasted six days in 1997. The transit agency handles more than 40 percent of commuters coming from the East Bay to San Francisco with the Bay Bridge handling another 50 percent said John Goodwin, a spokesman for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

Other transit agencies in the region urged commuters to consider carpooling, taking buses or ferries, working from home and, if they must drive to work, to leave earlier or even later than usual.

San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee said the city will offer increased transportation options, including at the airport, and increase staff for traffic management. BART said it will let commuters use parking lots at their 33 stations free of charge for the purpose of carpooling.

Zaveri reported from Berkeley, Calif.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
HLOEWEN wrote:
This comment has been deleted.
on July 1,2013 | 02:31AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Civil or same sex?
on July 1,2013 | 07:15AM
kgolfinghawaii wrote:
This is what Oahu has to look forward to when rail is complete. They can never get enough and the tax payers always have more money to give if you ask those greedy people running the unions. Amazing!
on July 1,2013 | 04:33AM
OldDiver wrote:
The difference is Honolulu's system is driverless. This dramaticly reduces the cost of operating the system compared to San Francisco's rail.
on July 1,2013 | 05:58AM
ueharator wrote:
Right.... and the trains maintain themselves so we don't need any employees to run the rail system.
on July 1,2013 | 07:18AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Of course not. The trains will be self servicing and will continue to run even through the next Armageddon. If an earthquake completely wipe out our population on Oahu the train will continue to roll onward.
on July 1,2013 | 09:05AM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
OldDiver wrote: "The difference is Honolulu's system is driverless."

That's no difference at all when it comes to transit unions ability to shut down the system and hold it hostage until their demands are met. Those SF commuters paid billions into that system via their taxes and fares and one union has taken it away until they get their demands met.

Apparently, relying on a transportation system that can be completely shut by disgruntled government employees wasn't such a good idea after all.

on July 1,2013 | 08:37AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Of course this would NEVER happen in Hawaii. Our rail system is safe because Hawaii workers would never inconvenience their families and friends ladat.
on July 1,2013 | 07:14AM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
They didn't waste any time moving this off the home page.
on July 1,2013 | 10:24AM
newsjunky1 wrote:
BART does this every coup le of years and this is what OAHU has to look forward to with the RAIL SYSTEM now under construction. The Bay Area is CRIPPLED by these strikes. This article Down-plays the reality. My daughter just called and after spendi ng 2 hours on the freeway and traveling about 8 miles, she pulled over to a Barnes and Noble to read for a while. Under normal circumstances, the drive home should take about 40 minutes. Friends are getting up at 3 am to make it to work on time. GET READY OAHU! Your turn IS coming. Your UNIONS at work. P.S. How would you like the salary and benefits they're so unhappy about?
on July 1,2013 | 01:57PM
Breaking News