Quantcast
  

Saturday, April 19, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

U.S.: 'Common-sense test' holds Assad responsible

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 04:46 a.m. HST, Sep 08, 2013


WASHINGTON >> The White House asserted today that a "common-sense test" rather than "irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence" makes the Syrian government responsible for a chemical weapons attack that President Barack Obama says demands a U.S. military response.

As part of a major push to win the backing of a divided Congress and skeptical American public, Obama's top aide made the rounds of the Sunday talk shows to press the case for "targeted, limited consequential action to deter and degrade" the capabilities of Syrian President Bashar Assad "to carry out these terrible attacks again."

At the same time, chief of staff Denis McDonough acknowledged the risks that military action could drag the U.S. into the middle of a brutal civil war and endanger allies such as Israel with a retaliatory attack.

The U.S. is "planning for every contingency in that regard and we'll be ready for that," he told CNN's "State of the Union."

The U.S., citing intelligence reports, says sarin gas was used in the Aug. 21 attack outside Damascus, and that 1,429 people died, including 426 children. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which collects information from a network of anti-regime activists, says it has so far only been able to confirm 502 dead.

The Syrian government denies responsibility, contending rebels were to blame.

Obama plans a national address Tuesday night from the White House on Syria, and McDonough was asked whether the president would reveal a direct connect between Assad and the attack.

"The materiel was used in the eastern suburbs of Damascus that have been controlled by the opposition for some time," McDonough said. "It was delivered by rockets -- rockets which we know the Assad regime has and we have no indication that the opposition has."

McDonough also cited a DVD compilation, released Saturday by a U.S official, of videos showing attack victims. The DVD was shown to senators during a classified briefing on Thursday.

"We've seen the video proof of the outcome of those attacks. All of that leads to a quite strong common-sense test irrespective of the intelligence that suggests that the regime carried this out. Now do we have a picture or do we have irrefutable beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence? This is not a court of law and intelligence does not work that way. So what we do know and what we know the common-sense test says is he is responsible for this. He should be held to account."

Recent opinion surveys show intense American skepticism about military intervention in Syria, even among those who believe Syria's government used chemical weapons on its people.

Congress resumes work Monday after its summer break, but already a heated debate is underway about Syria.

On Wednesday, the first showdown Senate vote is likely over a resolution authorizing the "limited and specified use" of U.S. armed forces against Syria for no more than 90 days and barring American ground troops from combat. A final vote is expected at week's end.

A House vote appears likely during the week of Sept. 16.

A survey by The Associated Press shows that House members who are staking out positions are either opposed to or leaning against Obama's plan for a military strike by more than a 6-1 margin. The Senate is more evenly divided ahead of its vote.

Nearly half of the 433-member House and a third of the 100-member Senate remain undecided.

Complicating the effort in the Senate is the possibility that a three-fifths majority may be required. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky says he is going to filibuster.

Still, Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic leader, has predicted, "I think we're going to get 60 votes,"

Another bipartisan, classified briefing for Congress is set for Monday. McDonough plans to meet Tuesday with the House Democratic Caucus, whose support could be crucial as Obama faces opposition from House Republicans.

Obama's national security adviser, Susan Rice, plans to discuss Syria in a speech Monday at the New America Foundation.

In addition to the classified briefing scheduled Monday for House members and senators on Wednesday, national security adviser Susan Rice will meet separately with the Congressional Black Caucus, the White House said.

Vice President Joe Biden planned to host a dinner Sunday night for a group of Senate Republicans, and lawmakers should expect more phone calls from top officials.

___

Online:

U.S. assessment on Syria: http://apne.ws/14etnyn







 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(12)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
palani wrote:
There's little in the way of "common sense" in this divisive, secretive, and hypocritical double-speaking administration. Why start now?
on September 8,2013 | 04:59AM
Grimbold wrote:
The opposite is true. Common sense tells that Assad had every bit of motivation to keep the US out of the civil war by NOT USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS.
on September 8,2013 | 06:20AM
livinginhawaii wrote:
You are correct - what's more likely - a stable government risking US intervention or rebel muslims (who have no qualms about strapping bombs on their women and children) wanting to make it look like Assad did it. Sadly it is Barry and Kerry who are failing the common sense test.
on September 8,2013 | 06:43AM
Ronin006 wrote:
Common sense also said Saddam had chemical weapons. Whatever happened to common sense?
on September 8,2013 | 07:58AM
krusha wrote:
Yeah, like he used a magic wand to gas the Iranians and the Kurds... http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/history-lesson-when-the-united-states-looked-the-other-way-on-chemical-weapons/2013/09/04/0ec828d6-1549-11e3-961c-f22d3aaf19ab_blog.html
on September 8,2013 | 08:15AM
cojef wrote:
Further the cache of "gas" that Saddam had could not be found so it begs the question, what happened to it? Easily, it could have been shipped to a friendly ally(Syria) not Iran as they have been historically hostile to each other. If one has to ask a question and the issue seems unclear, better judgement is to stay clear of the problem. Creditability is the issue here as it relates to the evidence.
on September 8,2013 | 08:32AM
mikethenovice wrote:
Russian lying to America that no gas was used in Syria is what other lies the Russian citizens have to be subjected too on a daily basis by their so-called leaders.
on September 8,2013 | 07:59AM
mikethenovice wrote:
It's all about hating America for promoting freedom.
on September 8,2013 | 08:07AM
mikethenovice wrote:
Is common sense possible in a communist country???
on September 8,2013 | 08:08AM
RichardCory wrote:
"Now do we have a picture or do we have irrefutable beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence? This is not a court of law and intelligence does not work that way." So we will only convict someone of stealing a pack of gum if proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but we will spend billions of go to war against an entire country just based on "common sense"? Thanks, Obama.
on September 8,2013 | 08:46AM
RichardCory wrote:
*...spend billions of dollars and go to war...*
on September 8,2013 | 08:46AM
honopic wrote:
The last time "common sense" and "White House" belonged in the same sentence together was during the Eisenhower administration. Ike warned us about the military-industrial complex and we still haven't heeded that warning. The U.S. has been involved in trunped-up wars ever since, regardless of who is in the Oval Office. "Come on, Wall Street, don't move slow. Why, Man, it's war a go-go. There's plenty good money to be made by supplying the army with tools of the trade."
on September 8,2013 | 09:22PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News