Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Biofuel firm says HELCO contract not needed for plan to work

By Star-Advertiser Staff

LAST UPDATED: 03:38 p.m. HST, Dec 26, 2013

The developer of a proposed biofuel production facility on Hawaii island said today it will proceed with its plans despite being told by regulators that Hawaii Electric Light Co. will not be allowed to buy the company's fuel for power generation.

The state Public Utilities Commission on Monday for the second time in two years rejected a plan by HELCO to buy 16 million gallons of locally produced biofuel a year from Aina Koa Pono, saying the cost of the alternative fuel was too high when compared with the fossil fuel that it would replace.

HELCO and its parent Hawaiian Electric Co. had proposed recovering the higher cost of the biofuel through a surcharge that would have added 90 cents a month to a typical residential  on Hawaii island and $1.08 a month for a typical residential bill on Oahu.

The PUC's three commissioners in a unanimous decision said their ruling was supported by several conclusions, including "the contract price for the AKP-produced biofuel is excessive and not cost-effective at present and for the foreseeable future, and thus, is unreasonable and inconsistent with the public interest."

The commissioners wrote that the biofuel contract with Aina Koa Pono would have potentially displaced "more economical, existing renewable energy resources or restrict the addition of other new low-cost, fixed price renewable energy projects." The  commissioners did not mention specific projects, but Hawaii island is home to a major geothermal energy plant, and HELCO is close to awarding additional contracts for more geothermal development.

Kenton Eldridge, co-founder and chairman of AKP, said the company will press ahead with the planned biofuel facility without a contract with HELCO.

"AKP is very disappointed with the PUC's decision but will continue to pursue our plan to produce both biofuels as well biochar. AKP still has an active contract with Mansfield Oil to produce up to 24 million gallons of biofuel to be used as transportation fuel," Eldridge said in an email.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
SteveToo wrote:
Bio-Fuel is a waist of money to those that buy it. That includes the id-iots in the Dept of Defense that think Navy ships should run on it.
on December 26,2013 | 04:05PM
Anonymous wrote:
If Hawaii's plantations couldn't be competitive growing sugar cane for sugar, what makes a small operation that lacks economies of sale think it can competitively grow sugar cane for biofuel?
on December 26,2013 | 04:45PM
Ronin006 wrote:
Big, really big government grants.
on December 27,2013 | 03:20PM
Breaking News