Quantcast

Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Justice Dept. applies same-sex rights to itself

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 12:56 a.m. HST, Feb 09, 2014


WASHINGTON >> In an assertion of same-sex marriage rights, Attorney General Eric Holder is applying a landmark Supreme Court ruling to the Justice Department, announcing Saturday that same-sex spouses cannot be compelled to testify against each other, should be eligible to file for bankruptcy jointly and are entitled to the same rights and privileges as federal prison inmates in opposite-sex marriages.

The Justice Department runs a number of benefits programs, and Holder says same-sex couples will qualify for them. They include the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund and benefits to surviving spouses of public safety officers who suffer catastrophic or fatal injuries in the line of duty.

"In every courthouse, in every proceeding and in every place where a member of the Department of Justice stands on behalf of the United States, they will strive to ensure that same-sex marriages receive the same privileges, protections and rights as opposite-sex marriages under federal law," Holder said in prepared remarks to the Human Rights Campaign in New York. The advocacy group works on behalf of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equal rights.

Just as in the civil rights struggles of the 1960s, the stakes in the current generation over same-sex marriage rights "could not be higher," said Holder.

"The Justice Department's role in confronting discrimination must be as aggressive today as it was in Robert Kennedy's time," Holder said of the attorney general who played a leadership role in advancing civil rights.

On Monday, the Justice Department will issue a policy memo to its employees instructing them to give lawful same-sex marriages full and equal recognition, to the greatest extent possible under the law.

Holder's address is the latest application of a Supreme Court ruling that struck down a provision in the Defense of Marriage Act defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The decision applies to legally married same-sex couples seeking federal benefits.

After the Supreme Court decision last June, the Treasury Department and the IRS said that all legally married gay couples may file joint federal tax returns, even if they reside in states that do not recognize same-sex marriages. The Defense Department said it would grant military spousal benefits to same-sex couples. The Health and Human Services Department said the Defense of Marriage Act is no longer a bar to states recognizing same-sex marriages under state Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management said it is now able to extend benefits to legally married same-sex spouses of federal employees and annuitants.

Holder told his audience:

--The Justice Department will recognize that same-sex spouses of individuals involved in civil and criminal cases should have the same legal rights as all other married couples, including the right to decline to give testimony that might incriminate their spouse. Prosecutors traditionally have various legal challenges that they can bring to an assertion of the spousal privilege. But the attorney general's speech made clear that the government will not bring a challenge on the ground that the marriage is not recognized in the state where the couple lives.

--The U.S. Trustee Program will take the position that same-sex married couples should be eligible to file for bankruptcy jointly and that domestic support obligations should include debts such as alimony owed to a former same-sex spouse.

-- Federal prisoners in same-sex marriages will be entitled to visitation by a spouse, inmate furloughs during a crisis involving a spouse, escorted trips to attend a spouse's funeral, correspondence with a spouse and compassionate release or reduction in sentence based on an inmate's spouse being incapacitated.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(5)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
daniwitz13 wrote:
This Attorney General is clueless on what matters in our Society. He is oblivious of what propels our Civilization and and why everyone is here today, even the Homosexuals. He is favoring an entity that has no past and no Future. It is an entity that is not needed in Society, except for diversity and deviation. Pity
on February 8,2014 | 09:41AM
hawaiiwalter wrote:
You seem pretty bitter witz. Why don't you try and get a life and stop worrying about "the homosexuals" unless, of course, you are one. Most folks probably pity YOU.
on February 8,2014 | 02:34PM
daniwitz13 wrote:
Are you saying something about me or what Mr. Holder is saying? Why don't you stop worrying what I say and talk about what he said like I did? You don't have an opinion on what he said but on what I said. Try to get a life too. Did I call Mr. Holder a Homosexual? Did you need to throw INSULTS at people to get your point across? People will pity me for being concerned about out Civilization and Society which they live in and not pity you for insulting people that shares a concern? Pity you.
on February 9,2014 | 11:05AM
Kuokoa wrote:
So tell me again, why do we need same-sex marriage? If the Feds lift restrictions on federal benefits and allow everyone to have them then it is a mute point.
on February 8,2014 | 05:20PM
Anonymous wrote:
Because in order to be eligible for the benefits Mr. Holder is referring to, you have to be legally married. In addition, you may have noticed that since we already have marriage equality in Hawaii, that also make your comment a moot point.
on February 8,2014 | 05:31PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings

Small Talk
Burning money

Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout