Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Agency seeks public comment on Hawaiian hawk

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 02:37 p.m. HST, Feb 13, 2014


The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is asking for the public's input on a proposal to remove the Hawaiian hawk or io from the endangered species list.

The agency said Wednesday comments previously submitted on the proposal don't need to be sent again.

The hawk was originally listed as endangered in 1967. At the time, the hawk population was believed to number in the low hundreds.

Due to various conservation efforts, there are now an estimated 3,000 of the birds in existence and the population has been stable for at least two decades.

The species is found throughout the Big Island. The hawk lives in native forest, pasture land, and other habitats.

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act would protect the bird even if it's taken off the endangered species list.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(9)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Good eating.
on February 13,2014 | 09:16AM
kahu808 wrote:
Meaning?
on February 13,2014 | 11:20AM
2NDC wrote:
Not really, actually the meat is kind of stringy and rubbery. :-(
on February 13,2014 | 04:42PM
ryan02 wrote:
Is the population stable BECAUSE of protection under the ESA? The article makes the broad statement that "the Migratory Bird Treaty Act would protect the bird even if it's taken off the endangered species list" -- but what is that based on? The ESA and MBTA are not identical. For example, the MBTA doesn't allow private groups (like environmental groups) to bring suit to protect the species, while the ESA does allow it.
on February 13,2014 | 10:21AM
kaiakea wrote:
Keep it protected.
on February 13,2014 | 11:14AM
96706 wrote:
Yes ... I agree ... leave it on the endangered list.
on February 13,2014 | 01:50PM
BigIsandLava wrote:
Not funny Maneki
on February 13,2014 | 11:42AM
Hapa_Haole_Boy wrote:
Do they have value if they were taken off? I.e. are they good eating, have valuable feathers, etc.? Also, more importantly-- what must the population be to achieve sustainability? It should reach that first before being considered to be taken off. Yes the population has been stable for two decades, but stable and sustainable are two different things.
on February 13,2014 | 02:40PM
biggerdog wrote:
They will be fine until they finish eating all the Hawaiian crows.
on February 13,2014 | 03:38PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News