Quantcast

Tuesday, July 22, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

$10 million in gold coins may have been stolen

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:46 a.m. HST, Mar 05, 2014


LOS ANGELES >> Word last week that a Northern California couple found $10 million in gold coins while walking their dog has set off a Gold Rush of theories over who left behind all that loot.

One is that Jesse James' gang deposited it in hopes of someday financing a second Civil War. Another postulates that the gold originally belonged to gentleman robber Black Bart, who wrote poetry when he wasn't sticking up stagecoaches.

But the theory gaining the most traction this week is that the hoard is made up of most of the $30,000 in gold coins that Walter Dimmick stole from the U.S. Mint in San Francisco in 1901. The coins were never recovered.

That theory, from fishing guide and amateur coin historian Jack Trout, set off a flurry of calls to the U.S. Mint after it was reported by the San Francisco Chronicle on Monday.

The Northern California couple's coins are called the Saddle Ridge Hoard after the area of the couple's land where they were discovered.

"We do not have any information linking the Saddle Ridge Hoard coins to any thefts at any United States Mint facility," mint officials said in a statement issued Tuesday.

Although Trout acknowledges he can't prove his theory, he still thinks he's right.

"There is no real direct proof, but I am getting more research in on this," he told The Associated Press by phone Tuesday from Chile, where he lives part of the year.

Dimmick is said to have spirited six sealed bags -- each filled with 250 $20 gold pieces -- out of the mint, where he was the chief cashier.

The Saddle Ridge Hoard contains 1,400 $20 gold pieces, 50 $10 gold pieces and four $5 gold pieces, with a range of dates beginning in 1847 and extending to 1894.

Don Kagin is a rare coin dealer who represents the couple who stumbled upon the coins, which have a face value of about $28,000. He said the San Francisco Mint heist was one of the first possibilities he and his staff checked out.

Even if the mint had coins on hand covering a span of 47 years, which is unlikely, those in the hoard include some so badly worn that they wouldn't have been there, said David McCarthy, Kagin's chief numismatist.

Another coin, dated 1876, was in such pristine condition that it wouldn't have been there either.

"It doesn't have a single marking on it," McCarthy said. "That coin couldn't have sat in a bag in the San Francisco Mint and looked like that. It would have had what we call 'bag marks' all over it."

As for some of the other theories:

-- The Jesse James one fails to account for the fact the Missouri outlaw died 12 years before the last coin was struck and was born the year the first one was.

-- Black Bart robbed stages only between 1877 and 1883, when he was caught and sent to prison.

The finders, who have chosen to remain anonymous, have their own theory.

They've done some research, Kagin said, and believe their property in California's Gold Rush country was occupied at the time by someone in the mining industry. That person must have squirreled away the coins over time.

Why the owner never came back for the coins, well, that's another mystery.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(7)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Upperkula wrote:
Finders keepers loosers weepers.This family found it on their property...it should be theirs to keep.
on March 4,2014 | 06:18PM
HIE wrote:
What is your issue? Nobody is trying to claim these coins from the couple who found them. Nobody is weeping. People are just trying to figure out the story behind the coins. Get a grip.
on March 5,2014 | 06:41AM
HAJAA1 wrote:
Geez - who's the one should get a grip? lol. Relax HIE, this is a forum.
on March 5,2014 | 10:30AM
sparkyzane wrote:
The point here is that if stolen from the mint there is no statute of limitations. Govt always wins in these cases. So if he slightest chance of theft from the Govt in any form they will lose their find.
on March 5,2014 | 04:24PM
HD36 wrote:
I believe this was a collection of a very well off businessman. In 1935 under Roosevelt, the US government made it illegal for US Citizens to hold gold. If you did not turn them into the government via a bank, the sentence was 10 years in jail. Back then the US was on a gold standard. The rate was 1 oz of gold per $20 federal note. Back then we were still following Article 1 Sect 10 of the United States Constitution which mandated that the currency be backed by gold or silver. The intention of the founders was that government could only spend what they had in gold or silver. Since you can't print gold out of thin air, the govenment couldn't get bigger without direct taxation of the people. If the people weren't willing to pay for bigger government, the people would be in control. By confiscating the citizens gold in 1935, and then closing the gold window in 1971, the government was able to grow unfettered simply by printing money via bond pruchases from the Federal Reserve Bank and defferring the day of payment untill we default or print money to pay off so much debt we end up with hyperinflation like in Zimbawe or the Weimar Republic in Germany.
on March 4,2014 | 07:36PM
sluggah wrote:
They should have kept their yaps SHUT!
on March 5,2014 | 06:47AM
808ikea wrote:
Yep, I was thinking the same thing. May be just sell a few coins at time so you don't draw attention.
on March 5,2014 | 11:34AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Wassup Wit Dat!
Silver Pockets Full

Political Radar
VoteVets

Political Radar
Values

Island Crafters
Christmas in July

Political Radar
IBEW endorsement

Warrior Beat
Travel day

Small Talk
Counting coins