Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Pro-Russia forces mount pressure on Ukrainians

By Yuras Karmanau and Dalton Bennett


SEVASTOPOL, Ukraine >> Moscow mounted pressure on Ukraine Saturday, with Russia’s foreign minister denouncing the new Ukrainian authorities as puppets of armed radicals and pro-Russia forces in Crimea trying to flush Ukrainian soldiers out of the few military bases still under their control.

The regional parliament in Crimea has set a March 16 referendum on leaving Ukraine to join Russia, and senior lawmakers in Moscow said they would support the move, ignoring sanctions threats and warnings from U.S. President Barack Obama that the vote would violate international law.

The strategic peninsula in southern Ukraine has become the flashpoint in the battle for Ukraine, where three months of protests sent President Viktor Yanukovych fleeing to Russia. A majority of people in Crimea identify with Russia, and Moscow has a major naval base on the Black Sea.

While the U.S. and the EU urged Russia to engage in dialogue with new Ukrainian authorities who came to power on the wave of protests that sent President Viktor Yanukovych fleeing to Russia, the Kremlin has refused to do so, denouncing the change of power in Ukraine as “unconstitutional coup.”

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Saturday that Moscow sees no sense in having a dialogue with Ukraine’s new authorities because, in his view, they kowtow to radical nationalists.

“The so-called interim government isn’t independent, it depends, to our great regret, on radical nationalists who have seized power with arms,” he said at a news conference.  He said that nationalist groups use “intimidation and terror” to control Ukraine.

Meanwhile in Crimea, pro-Russia soldiers late Friday tried to take over a Ukrainian base in a tense standoff that lasted for several hours.

Lt. Col. Vitaly Onishchenko, deputy commander of the base, said three dozen men wearing unmarked camouflage uniforms arrived late Friday. While one group climbed over a wall on one side of the base, another crashed a heavy military truck through the gates, Onishchenko said.

He said Saturday that they turned off power, cut telephone lines and demanded that about 100 Ukrainian troops, who barricaded themselves into one of the base buildings, surrender their weapons and swear allegiance to Russia. The invaders left around midnight.

No shots were fired in and no injuries were reported, but the incident reflected tensions running high on the Black Sea peninsula. In the week since Russia seized control of Crimea, Russian troops have been neutralizing and disarming Ukrainian military bases there. Some Ukrainian units, however, have refused to give up. Crimea’s new leader has said pro-Russian forces numbering more than 11,000 now control all access to the region and have blockaded all military bases that haven’t yet surrendered.

Russia has denied that its forces are active in Crimea, describing the troops who wear green uniforms without insignia as local “self-defense forces.” But many of the troops, who are armed with advanced heavy weaponry, are being transported by vehicles with Russian license plates.

Onishchenko said the troops who assailed his base were clearly Russian.

“These were Russian servicemen specially ordered,” he said. “Their watches were set to Moscow time. They spoke with Russian accents and they didn’t hide their allegiance to the Russian Federation. But they didn’t have any distinguishing marks (on their uniforms). Without doubt, this was a Russian action.”

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin said that Moscow has no intention of annexing Crimea, but says its people have the right to determine the region’s status in a referendum.

The Crimean referendum has been denounced by Ukraine’s new government, and U.S. President Barack Obama says it would violate international law. The U.S. moved Thursday to impose its first sanctions on Russians involved in the military occupation of Crimea.

Speaking on BBC on Saturday, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that while there is no military response to the recent events of Crimea, the crisis was a reminder that there are treats to European security and stability.

“I do believe that politicians all over NATO will now rethink the whole thing about investment in security and defense,” he told the BBC. “Obviously, defense comes at a cost but insecurity is much more expensive.”

Mike Eckel in Kiev, Vladimir Isachenkov in Moscow and Danica Kirka in London contributed to this report

 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
HanabataDays wrote:
The Russkies are ratcheting up the pressure in the hopes of provoking an incident that would allow them to go into full battle-rattle takeover mode. Let's hope Ukrainians have enough perspective to realize this and enough spiritual fortitude to stand firm in the face of these rash provocations.
on March 8,2014 | 01:32AM
hanalei395 wrote:
The majority Russian population in Crimea has the "spiritual fortitude" since 1954, to again, become a part of Russia.
on March 8,2014 | 06:25AM
Grimbold wrote:
Putin is in dire straits. The Crimea population is majority Russian and Ukraine new government is anti Russian. The US would do the same thing he does . Remember Granada?
on March 8,2014 | 02:52AM
hanalei395 wrote:
Invading Grenada was Ronald Reagan's "revenge" for the bombing and killing of 241 Marines in Beirut, Lebanon by Islamic terrorists, 2 days earlier.
on March 8,2014 | 03:39AM
Winston wrote:
A truly bizarre connection.
on March 8,2014 | 08:38AM
hanalei395 wrote:
It worked. The VAST attention of the American public, and the media, went from the tragedy of the Marines, to the invasion of Grenada. (Americans may have wanted something "positive" from Reagan).
on March 8,2014 | 09:07AM
islandsun wrote:
Better watch out Putin is going thru late male menopause.
on March 8,2014 | 05:39AM
krusha wrote:
Shows that Putin still have the old Soviet Union in their heart and has had more success with sending in their military to solve political problems instead of using diplomacy. I just hope this doesn't turn into a civil war, since there are a lot of people in Crimea who does not want Russia to annex that region, especially the Tartars who were persecuted by the old Soviet regime.
on March 8,2014 | 06:58AM
saveparadise wrote:
My own opinion is that Putin and the Russkies are justified. They are providing security in Crimea for those that want to unify with Russia. Once Yanukovych withdrew the security forces Western influence wanted to rule. No anarchy here since the Russian military moved in and not a shot to kill fired. Let's see if they honor a vote to remain Ukraine. Highly unlikely since the majority there is pro Russian. They speak Russian there not English. The EU should honor the voting process as well. Crimea will belong to Russia, end of story.
on March 8,2014 | 09:30AM
Grimbold wrote:
@saveparadise I wished Obama would see it the same way as you.
on March 8,2014 | 11:20AM
waikane75 wrote:
And what about the 40% of the population who are Ukranian, Tartar or non Russian? The world knows that any vote here cannot be truly democratic with a hostile pro Russian crowd calling all the shots. Who can speak out against this when the pro Russian actions are backed by armed soldiers who are part of a foreign military occupation. The US needs to step up or else where will Putin's aggression end? These threats of "economic sanctions" and cancelled visas are falling on deaf ears. If world leaders were to follow Putin's logic, Mexico would be justified in invading and occupying San Diego and LA if they felt the need to protect the large Spanish speaking population.
on March 8,2014 | 03:49PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
No worries. While Putin moves to consolidate his positions, Barry and the fam is in Florida munching stone crabs and hitting the links.
on March 8,2014 | 01:14PM
Breaking News
Political Radar
`Values,’ too

Political Radar

Wassup Wit Dat!
Bettah Not Lose It

Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings