Thursday, July 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Lawsuit against Maui police in 2010 shooting dismissed

By Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 11:03 a.m. HST, Mar 25, 2014

WAILUKU >> A federal judge has dismissed an excessive force lawsuit by two men who were shot by Maui police officers in 2010.

U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson ruled the officers used reasonable force in firing shots at the driver of a fleeing truck, the Maui News reported. The order filed last week said the four officers fired in an effort to stop the driver and inadvertently hit Joshua Nakagawa and Anthony Lum-John, who were riding in the bed of the truck.

The two men sued, claiming excessive force was used and their civil rights were violated. Their attorneys didn't immediately respond to requests for comment by The Associated Press Tuesday.

"The officers have been completely vindicated," said Maui County Deputy Corporation Counsel Moana Lutey. "This ruling ends the lawsuit in favor of the officers and the county."

Officers Erik Losvar, Russell Kapahulehua, Jun Hattori and Harry Matsuura Jr. were investigating reports of gunshots fired at Punalau Beach. Despite instructions from the officers to stop, a Toyota pickup truck slowed, then suddenly accelerated, striking Losvar, according to the ruling.

Watson's order said the officers were unaware Nakagawa and Lum-John were in the truck and were forced to make "split-second" decisions to protect others.

"Fearing Losvar would be run over, Kapahulehua raised his gun and fired three shots at the driver's head in quick succession," the order said. "Despite being struck by the truck in the right hip, and being thrown off on the driver's side of the truck, Losvar was able to fire at the Toyota's driver because he believed that Matsuura was in danger of being struck next or killed."

The officers fired 15 rounds, police said. Lum-John was shot once in his buttock and Nakagawa was shot three times in the back.

Nakagawa's Honolulu attorney, Michael Green, told The Associated Press Tuesday that they plan to appeal. "I respect the judge," Green said. "I just respectfully disagree with his ruling."

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Bully wrote:
Did the officers hit the driver?
on March 25,2014 | 09:51AM
AlexandriaB wrote:
The criminals deserved every shot fired at them.
on March 25,2014 | 10:33AM
dontbelieveinmyths wrote:
Hooray for justice. You hoodlums want to sue someone, sue your friend the driver.
on March 25,2014 | 10:41AM
daniwitz13 wrote:
This judge has no conception of Justice. It is against Dept. policy to shoot at a FLEEING suspect. It has been ruled that for the Police to stand in the path of escape, is NOT an excuse to shoot. This is generally understood by most educated Judges. Here the salt air corrodes their mind. Pity
on March 25,2014 | 12:02PM
Breaking News