Quantcast

Wednesday, July 30, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

World court orders Japan to halt whaling in Antarctica

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 04:48 a.m. HST, Apr 01, 2014


THE HAGUE, Netherlands » The future of whaling in Japan was thrown into doubt after the International Court of Justice ruled Monday that the nation's annual hunt in the Antarctic was not really for scientific purposes — as Tokyo had claimed — and ordered it halted.

The ruling was a major victory for whaling opponents, as it ends for now one of the world's biggest whale hunts, for minkes in the icy Southern Ocean. The judgment was praised by Australia, which brought the case against Japan in 2010, and by environmentalists, who have been seeking an end to whaling since the 1970s on ethical grounds.

The world court's decision leaves Japan with a tough choice between ending whaling outright — despite past claims that it would never abandon such a deep-seated cultural practice — or redesigning its program to make it a scientific endeavor after all.

Japan has previously all but ruled out joining Norway and Iceland in openly flouting the international consensus against commercial whaling.

Former Australian environment minister Peter Garrett, who oversaw the suit's launch, said he felt vindicated.

"I'm absolutely over the moon, for all those people who wanted to see the charade of scientific whaling cease once and for all," Garrett told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio. "I think (this) means without any shadow of a doubt that we won't see the taking of whales in the Southern Ocean in the name of science."

In a 12-4 majority judgment, the U.N. court sided with Australia, finding that Japan's program fell short of following scientific methods. For instance, judges said Japan had given no reason for its target of 850 minke whales annually and often failed to meet the target. It gave no defense of why it needed to kill that many to study them. And the "research" program had produced just two peer-reviewed scientific papers since 2005.

"The court concludes that the special permits granted by Japan for the killing, taking, and treating of whales ... are not 'for purposes of scientific research'," presiding judge Peter Tomka said.

The court ordered Japan to grant no further permits for its current Antarctic program.

Japan had argued its study was aimed at determining whether commercial hunting could be conducted on a sustainable basis.

The International Court of Justice is the U.N.'s court for resolving disputes between nations and its ruling are binding and not subject to appeal. Although sovereign countries can and occasionally do ignore them at times, both Japan and Australia had pledged to abide by this decision.

Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said Monday the government will keep its word and obey the court "as a state that places a great importance on the international legal order."

However, he criticized the International Whaling Commission, the main international body that regulates whaling, which ordered a moratorium on all commercial whaling in 1986. That moratorium has remained in place despite recommendations from its own scientific committee that some whale species are robust enough to support a whaling industry.

Suga said Japan has cooperated with the IWC for decades "despite the deep divisions within the Commission, and its inability in recent years to function effectively."

He left the question of what Japan will do next unanswered.

Membership in the International Whaling Commission is voluntary and Norway and Iceland have simply decided to ignore its mandates while remaining members.

Under IWC rules, countries are allowed to issue themselves as many permits as they see fit to kill whales for scientific purposes. The permits are subject to a nonbinding review by a 200-member scientific committee that has been critical of Japan for many of the same reasons outlined by the world court in Monday's ruling.

Norway hunts around 500 minke whales in the northeast Atlantic each year, while Iceland hunts roughly 50. Japan has a second scientific program in the north Pacific which culls around 100 minke whales annually. That program may now also be open to challenge because it was not covered in the Australian suit.

Activist Pete Bethune, a New Zealander who has clashed frequently with Japanese whalers in attempts to stop their hunt, said "justice was served" by Monday's ruling.

"The court dissected their scientific program, pulled it to bits and it proved that the amount of science is tiny relative to the commercial aspects," he said outside the courtroom.

The ruling left the door open for Japan to launch a new scientific hunt, though any new program would face intense scrutiny and would presumably need to be better designed.

Judges said explicitly there was nothing in international law that forbids killing whales as part of a scientific study. It also noted that whales culled for scientific purposes may be slaughtered and sold — although that could not be the primary purpose of a scientific study.

Consumption of whale meat has declined in popularity in Japan in recent years but it is still considered a delicacy by some. Most of the whale meat from Japanese hunts ends up being sold.

Mitsumasa Kamiota, an official with Japan's Fisheries Agency, underlined that Japan has not said it will quit research whaling altogether. He said Monday's ruling only affects the country's Antarctic program, and whaling in the north Pacific will continue.

Kamiota also hinted that Japan may eventually come up with a new research program in the Antarctic. He said Japan does not intend to withdraw from the International Whaling Commission.

"There is no change to our commitment to continue scientific research whaling under the international rules," he said. "We will carefully examine what is allowed and what is not allowed under the ruling."

Japan had argued that Australia's suit was an attempt to force its cultural norms on Japan, saying it was equivalent to Hindus demanding an international ban on killing cows.

Associated Press reporters Mari Yamaguchi and Kristen Gelineau contributed to this story from Tokyo, Japan and Sydney, Australia.






 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(11)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
lokela wrote:
We all know it was not in the scientific interest. You don't need to kill that many whales for scientific reasons.
on March 31,2014 | 04:26PM
EducatedLocalBoy wrote:
I'm part Japanese and enjoy Japanese food from Japan, but humans have to stop plundering the earth's scarce resources. I'm old enough to have eaten green sea turtle meat before it became illegal to hunt them, and it is very tasty, and culturally one of the foods native Hawaiians used to eat. But native Hawaiians and the rest of the United States had to stop eating turtle meat because turtles were being hunted to extinction. It is no different than whale blubber, it is Japanese gourmet food, but Japanese and the rest of the world has to stop eating it because whales are near extinction. It's just common sense don't you think?
on March 31,2014 | 05:56PM
naialani wrote:
yes =) Most important to remember in the year 2014... We must NOT continue to be stuck on stupid ... great comment.. thank you
on March 31,2014 | 07:21PM
kiragirl wrote:
Great news! It is a step in the right direction as more needs to be done including the counties not in the IWC.
on March 31,2014 | 04:30PM
Hilofrank wrote:
Give me a break. Does anyone really think Japan is going to follow the International Court's ruling, which means absolutely nothing in the real world?
on March 31,2014 | 04:33PM
glenn57377 wrote:
They will abide, except for whaling not covered by this ruling. Their government said they will abide by the ruling.......and I believe they certainly will.
on March 31,2014 | 10:56PM
Ronin006 wrote:
This is terrible. I won't be able to watch "Whaling Wars' any more.
on March 31,2014 | 04:39PM
BigOpu wrote:
Ha! That was the first thing I thought about when I saw this article. I looked forward to the weekly battles. DVR'd it.
on March 31,2014 | 09:22PM
engineersoldier wrote:
About time! The Japanese should be ashamed of their charade and should have stopped on their own.
on March 31,2014 | 04:48PM
EducatedLocalBoy wrote:
Engineersoldier, you are absolutely right. It is about time and the Japanese ought to be ashamed for lying about why they are killing whales. But human nature being what it is, there are many things that humans ought to be ashamed for lying about what they are doing. For example, the guy in Florida who lied about why he killed the black teen whose music and looks he didn't like. He lied and convinced one half of the jury that he killed the teem in cold blood and with no remorse because of a shotgun that didn't exist. There are a lot of selfish people running around loose who have to be forced to do the right thing.
on March 31,2014 | 06:15PM
richierich wrote:
Have any of you even tried whale? Its actually pretty good. I don't see why killing a whale to eat is any different than killing tuna or a cow to eat.
on April 1,2014 | 06:16AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News