Wednesday, July 30, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Report finds a Los Angeles in decline

By Adam Nagourney

New York Times

LAST UPDATED: 08:39 p.m. HST, Apr 09, 2014

LOS ANGELES » From the 73-story skyscraper that just broke ground downtown (the tallest in the West), to the blizzard of office, shopping and apartment complexes rising from there to the Pacific, construction is bustling in Los Angeles. Home prices are up, and the foreclosure rate is declining. Crime is down. There is a new mayor in City Hall. In many ways, Los Angeles, like many once-beleaguered cities across the nation, seems on the upswing.

Yet at this presumed moment of promise and potential, Los Angeles is enduring a series of blows that have challenged its self-esteem and even its long-term stability. Some appear more symbolic, like the departure of "The Tonight Show" for New York, followed by the plaintive appeal by Mayor Eric A. Garcetti that CBS move "The Late Show" to Los Angeles when David Letterman retires next year. Others are beyond its control, such as the disconcerting wave of earthquakes that have rumbled the region in recent weeks, reminding residents of how unprepared Southern California is for a cataclysmic temblor.

But the most worrisome blow by far is a scathing verdict on Los Angeles' civic health that was delivered in a one-two punch — the second on Wednesday — by a committee of lawyers, developers, labor leaders and former elected officials who make up something of the Old Guard here. The Los Angeles 2020 Commission presented a catalog of failings that it said were a unique burden to the city: widespread poverty and job stagnation, huge municipal pension obligations, a struggling port and tourism industry and paralyzing traffic that would not be eased even with a continuing multibillion-dollar mass transit initiative.

"Los Angeles is barely treading water, while the rest of the world is moving forward," the commission said. "We risk falling further behind in adapting to the realities of the 21st century and becoming a city in decline."

"Year by year, our city — which once was a beacon of innovation and opportunity to the world — is becoming less livable," the report said.

The first part of the report was released in December. Its bleak portrait of Los Angeles' future was designed to break through and draw attention to the city's plight like "an alarm clock," said Mickey Kantor, a former U.S. secretary of commerce who is the co-chairman of the commission.

But as exhaustive as Chapter 1 was in laying out problems, the follow-up presented here Wednesday was strikingly less ambitious and specific, testimony to what municipal leaders have long said was the intractability of the challenges, the difficulty in getting things done in a community with a history of lackluster civic involvement and an institutionally weak mayor.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
droid wrote:
Just watch “Gangster Squad” to see just how fragile Los Angeles’ foundation really is. The more things change, the more... well, you know the rest.
on April 10,2014 | 03:47AM
Grimbold wrote:
Reason Nr.1: Overpopulation. Reason Nr.2 and Nr3. Are politically incorrect and can not be published. Unless death penalty for all repeated felons is instated LA will go to hell.
on April 10,2014 | 07:16AM
AhiPoke wrote:
It's always been a matter of time. Virtually all big cities that grew during the 20th century are now in decline. Why? Overspending when times were good and leaving most cities without reserves as times get more difficult. I'm sure 50 years ago no one would have bet that Detroit would be in the conditions it's in. If you look at what's happening in Hawaii/Honolulu we're going down the same path and our legislature has done little to change direction.
on April 10,2014 | 07:24AM
ryan02 wrote:
It's almost as if the Hawaii politicians WANT Hawaii to become a third-world toilet. I can't imagine why, other than sacrificing Hawaii lets the politicians get rich TODAY, and screw future generations, right?
on April 10,2014 | 07:33AM
HD36 wrote:
Yes, the public unions get raises as payback for backing the politician, and taxes go up. Eventually the middle class moves out.
on April 10,2014 | 09:25AM
Breaking News