Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Depth of Hawaii health exchange probe unclear

By Cathy Bussewitz

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 02:24 p.m. HST, Apr 18, 2014

The scope of a federal review of Hawaii's troubled health insurance exchange was unclear Friday after the U.S. Government Accountability Ofice said it has not yet determined how deeply it might investigate.

The statement by the federal agency came one day after state Sen. Sam Slom said he was told by a legislative adviser at the GAO that Hawaii would be among a handful of states to be investigated.

Slom said he was told Hawaii would be involved because there was so much interest.

However, GAO spokesman Chuck Young said in an email that he believes Slom misunderstood.

"GAO will indeed be looking generally at state exchanges, but a list of which ones we will examine in more detail is still under development," Young wrote.

He added that the office has already announced an investigation of the Oregon health exchange. Young declined to answer questions beyond his emailed statement.

Slom on Friday stood by his announcement and said he was told about the investigation by GAO adviser David Lewis in a phone call.

"There was no misunderstanding," Slom said. "We had a lengthy discussion about the whole situation, and Hawaii was one of the states."

Slom said Lewis confirmed the agency would investigate whether the Hawaii Health Connector followed procedures regarding security issues and how it used federal funds.

Lewis did not respond to emails and phone calls seeking comment. An agency directory published in January lists Lewis as a legislative adviser.

The GAO is a nonpartisan congressional agency that audits federal programs. Slom had sent it a letter in late March requesting an investigation into the way Hawaii spent or planned to spend more than $200 million in federal grant money.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
st1d wrote:
right . . .an investigation . . . conclusion . . . unfounded . . . insufficient evidence to support any complaint . . . thank you, democrats.
on April 18,2014 | 02:43PM
SueH wrote:
And maybe because this is the mainland justice system, she might actually SERVE her full sentence, and not be released early.
on April 18,2014 | 04:19PM
localguy wrote:
After the willful, utter initial failure of healthcare.gov, where does the Fed think they can inspect other sites? Truly a case of the blind leading the blind.
on April 18,2014 | 05:28PM
CEI wrote:
Rest assured this "federal review" will go nowhere as it will make the Marxist in the white house look bad. The news outlets will ignore the story just as they do the IRS targeting the tea party, the cover ups of Benghazi, the outright lies and broken promises of Barry care and general incompetence of he and his administration.
on April 18,2014 | 05:56PM
Breaking News
Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings

Small Talk
Burning money

Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout