Quantcast

Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

12 states still ban sodomy a decade after court ruling

By Lauren Langlois

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 04:58 p.m. HST, Apr 21, 2014



BATON ROUGE, La. » A dozen states still have anti-sodomy laws on the books 10 years after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled they are unconstitutional.

One such state is Louisiana, where gay rights groups contend police have used anti-sodomy laws to target gay men. But state lawmakers sided with religious and conservative groups in refusing to repeal the law last week.

Of 14 states that had anti-sodomy laws, only Montana and Virginia have repealed theirs since the Supreme Court ruling, said Sarah Warbelow, legal director for the Human Rights Campaign, a national gay rights organization.

Warbelow says that in addition to Louisiana, anti-sodomy laws remain on the books in Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Utah.

The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 that it is unconstitutional to bar consensual sex between adults, calling it a violation of the 14th Amendment.

Last year, police in East Baton Rouge Parish arrested gay men for attempted crimes against nature using the anti-sodomy law in a sting operation that caused a national outcry. The district attorney wouldn't bring charges against the arrested men, saying the law was unenforceable.

This led Rep. Patricia Smith, D-Baton Rouge, to file the bill that would repeal Louisiana's anti-sodomy law, saying it would make the system fairer and more efficient.

"We don't need inefficient laws on the books," she said.

Her fellow representatives, however, disagreed and voted 66-27 on April 15 to keep the law in place.

Gene Mills, president of the conservative Louisiana Family Forum, said he was not surprised the bill failed considering the state's culture.

"It's not a Louisiana value," he said of the repeal.

Others argue Louisiana lawmakers are going against public opinion and sending out a message that gay people are unwelcome in the state.

"It just shows how out of touch Louisiana representatives are," said Patrick Paschall, senior policy counsel for public policy and government affairs at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

Terry Young Jr., a 27-year-old gay man, said he cannot understand why Louisiana lawmakers would want to keep a law that was declared unconstitutional.

"It's a reflection of the overall homophobia," said Young, at the state Capitol last week.

While social conservatism plays a role in keeping unusable anti-sodomy laws on the books, Warbelow said lawmakers may also feel overwhelmed with having to rewrite statutes to accommodate concerns about aggravated sodomy.

Some anti-sodomy laws, including Louisiana's, use one statute to prohibit both consensual sodomy and aggravated sodomy. Opponents of the repeal argued that it would eliminate protections from oral and anal sexual assault.

Warbelow said lawmakers could have addressed this concern by rewriting their sexual-assault statutes. While doing so might have been a daunting task, it would have been better than keeping the anti-sodomy laws and relying on courts to uphold the Supreme Court decision, she said.

MAP

States that still ban sodomy







 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(8)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Well, that's a pain in the rear.
on April 21,2014 | 05:47PM
8082062424 wrote:
lol that reply was perfect
on April 21,2014 | 05:56PM
st1d wrote:
didn't see that coming.
on April 21,2014 | 07:32PM
EMS wrote:
Personally..this is one law I would have absolutely not break....sodomy is just plain nasty!
on April 21,2014 | 08:28PM
username_required wrote:
I have break... it good!
on April 21,2014 | 09:15PM
kolohepalu wrote:
Institutionalized bigotry- allowed because the majority of voters in that state are prejudiced, simpleton cracker-folk, much like the other red-states.
on April 21,2014 | 09:44PM
Skyler wrote:
I'm on the side of "No way in hell would I do that" - I don't care who supports/doesn't support it.
on April 22,2014 | 12:46AM
inverse wrote:
This law which criminalizes sex between consenting adult makes as much sense as a law that legalizes police to have paid sex with prostitutes (to prevent prostitutes from cop-checking or having sex with a john without requesting payment). Hawaii has a lot in common with states like Utah ( also the only 2 states that don't hVe legalized gambling), Lousiana, Mississippi (burning), Alabama and backward states that are controlled by religious and other messed-up fanatical factions
on April 22,2014 | 03:26AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War