Quantcast

Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Memo describing targeted killing of U.S. citizens to be released

By Nedra Pickler

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:01 p.m. HST, May 20, 2014


WASHINGTON » On the eve of a critical Senate vote and under court order, the Obama administration signaled it will publicly reveal a secret memo describing its legal justification for using drones to kill U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism overseas.

Two administration officials told The Associated Press that the Justice Department has decided not to appeal a Court of Appeals ruling requiring disclosure of a redacted version of the memo under the Freedom of Information Act. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the matter.

The decision to release the documents comes as the Senate is to vote Wednesday on advancing President Barack Obama's nomination of the memo's author, Harvard professor and former Justice Department official David Barron, to sit on the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., had vowed to fight Barron's confirmation, and some Democratic senators were calling for the memo's public release before a final vote.

Wednesday's expected procedural vote would allow the Senate to move ahead with a final vote on Barron on Thursday. "I think we'll be OK," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said earlier Tuesday.

Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaida leader born in the United States, was killed after being targeted by a drone strike in Yemen in September 2011. Some legal scholars and human rights activists complained that it was illegal for the U.S. to kill American citizens away from the battlefield without a trial.

Some senators, including those in Obama's own party, have called for the public release of the memo before the final confirmation vote. The White House agreed under the pressure to show senators unredacted copies of all written legal advice written by Barron regarding the potential use of lethal force against U.S. citizens in counterterrorism operations.

Until now, the administration has fought in court to keep the writings from public view. But administration officials said that Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. decided this week not appeal an April 21 ruling requiring disclosure by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York and that Attorney General Eric Holder concurred with his opinion.

The release could take some time, since the redactions are subject to court approval. And the administration also is insisting that a classified ruling on the case also be redacted to protect information classified for national security, but not the legal reasoning, one of the officials said.

The drone strike that killed al-Awlaki also killed another U.S. citizen, Samir Khan, an al-Qaida propagandist. Al-Awlaki's 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, was killed the following month in another drone attack.

The American Civil Liberties Union and two reporters for The New York Times, Charlie Savage and Scott Shane, filed a FOIA suit. In January 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon ruled that she had no authority to order the documents disclosed, although she chided the Obama administration for refusing to release them.

But a three-judge appeals court panel noted that after McMahon ruled, senior government officials spoke about the subject. The panel rejected the government's claim that the court could not consider official disclosures made after McMahon's ruling, including a 16-page Justice Department white paper on the subject and public comments by Obama in May in which he acknowledged his role in the al-Awlaki killing, saying he had "authorized the strike that took him out."

The ACLU urged senators in a letter Tuesday not to move forward on the confirmation vote until they have a chance to see any Barron memos on the administration's drone program, not just those involving U.S. citizens.

Paul issued a statement Tuesday saying he still opposes Barron's nomination. "I rise today to say that there is no legal precedent for killing American citizens not directly involved in combat and that any nominee who rubber stamps and grants such power to a president is not worthy of being placed one step away from the Supreme Court," Paul said in remarks prepared for delivery on the Senate floor Wednesday provided by his office.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., has been pushing for public disclosure of Barron's writings and was one of several Democrats who had been refusing to say whether he'd vote for confirmation without it. "That's certainly very constructive," Wyden said when told of the decision not to appeal.

The administration's decision won over at least one senator, Mark Udall, D-Colo., who had been opposed to Barron because of the memo's secrecy. "This is a welcome development for government transparency and affirms that although the government does have the right to keep national security secrets, it does not get to have secret law," Udall said.

Associated Press writer Alan Fram contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(6)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
sailfish1 wrote:
Whoever doesn't want to use drones to kill U.S. citizens who have become Al Qaeda leaders can volunteer next time to go to Yemen, Pakistan, etc. to go hunt them down with a pistol and knife.
on May 20,2014 | 07:10PM
primowarrior wrote:
Enemies of our country who want to target U.S. citizens should expect to be targeted as well, regardless of what citizenship they hold.
on May 20,2014 | 07:16PM
pcman wrote:
Any American terrorist who targets other Americans and allies overseas is an open target himself. This is poetic justice but justice. Even in America, the American terrorist may be targeted and killed before being captured, tried and convicted. So what's the difference?
on May 20,2014 | 07:53PM
RichardCory wrote:
"Even in America, the American terrorist may be targeted and killed before being captured, tried and convicted. So what's the difference?"

Well, what you just said is entirely not true, so that's the difference.
on May 20,2014 | 08:47PM
hikine wrote:
Legal justification to kill American citizens. Does that sound right to you? What other memos that are not being brought out to the public? The drones also killed innocent bystanders which means they were a casualty of war? What war? War on terrorism? The US should look in the mirror because we became terrorists too in the eyes of our enemies.
on May 20,2014 | 08:32PM
Hawaii_Libertarian wrote:
I formerly worked in the Pentagon, visited the former World Trade Center several times, and worked at U.S. Central Command headquarters so I despise terrorists as much as anyone. I find it frightening that people can support extra-judicial killing of American citizens overseas or in the United States without due process. Just because the President signs off on it doesn't make it right. Remember, Nixon had an "enemies list", too. If this extra-judicial killing isn't stopped, a future president who chooses to abuse his power will just need to declare his political enemies to be "terrorists" and turn loose the U.S. Government killing machine to execute his political enemies just like Hitler did.
on May 20,2014 | 08:50PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs