Quantcast

Wednesday, July 30, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Career criminal mistakenly freed, killed hours later

By Scott Smith

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 04:39 p.m. HST, Jun 12, 2014


FRESNO, Calif. » A burglary defendant who won his freedom because of a jury's mistake lost his life a few hours later when he was stabbed to death in a fight.

The jury in the trial of Bobby Lee Pearson, 37, mistakenly signed a not-guilty form Wednesday, and the flabbergasted judge said he had no choice but to order him to be released from jail because the verdict had already been put on the record.

It was too late when the judge finally learned that the jury was unable to reach a verdict, stalling on an 8-4 vote in favor of guilt. Prosecutors might have had an opportunity to retry Pearson, but by then, changing the verdict form would have exposed Pearson to double jeopardy.

After being released from jail, Pearson went to the home of his sister, Lasandra Jackson, to get some clothing and belongings. Fresno police Chief Jerry Dyer said Pearson apparently got into a fight with his sister's boyfriend, 35-year-old Willie Gray.

The two had a history of problems, said Dyer, adding that investigators believe Gray killed Pearson, who was found dead in the street with a chest wound from a knife or gun and a cut on his stomach. Investigators found a steak knife near the body, Dyer said.

Gray was arrested and treated for injuries to his hands before being booked on suspicion of murder, said Dyer, adding that Pearson might still be alive if it weren't for the jury's "mishap." Pearson had a long criminal past, Dyer said.

William Terrence, who prosecuted the case, told The Associated Press that despite the bizarre chain of events that led to Pearson's release, the man he tried sending to prison didn't deserve to die that way.

"There's not a death penalty on a burglary," Terrence said. "I'm not sitting here thinking he got what he deserved."

Terrence said he is still trying to understand the jury's confusion. He said he explained the verdict forms in closing arguments, and so did the judge.

"Apparently, the message wasn't quite received," Terrence said.

In a deadlock, jurors should have sent a note to the judge.

Pearson and two co-defendants were accused of burglarizing an apartment last year and stealing a video system and a gun. The homeowner allegedly caught the intruders and wrestled with one of them.

Jurors returned a guilty verdict against Pearson's co-defendant, Terrel Minnieweather and the mistaken not-guilty verdict againstPearson before lunch Wednesday.

Terrence said Hamlin polled each juror individually to verify Minnieweather's guilty verdict. Turning to Pearson's case, the judge asked the jurors as a group if that was its not-guilty verdict in Pearson's case.

"No one stood up and said, 'Hey, wait a minute. That's not my verdict,'" Terrence said. "They nodded along."

Terrence said that it wasn't a mistake to poll the jury as a group. The evidence against Pearson wasn't as strong, and Terrence said he respected the jury's apparent not-guilty decision.

The jurors were then asked to return after lunch for a potential second phase of the trial. The confusion over the verdict came to light during lunch, when one juror told court staff that he had voted to find Pearson guilty.

Jurors said they were confused by the forms, one of which was for a guilty verdict and the other for a not guilty verdict. One juror said there was no form they could sign to indicate a deadlock.

"It is bizarre," said Eugene Hyman, who retired from the Santa Clara County Superior Court after serving for 20 years on the bench. "But I can't find fault with anyone."

Hyman, who had no involvement in Pearson's case, said during trials, he would ask each juror whether the verdict read by the clerk was indeed their verdict. He said there's nothing wrong with polling jurors en masse.

Hyman said the judge had no choice but to acquit Pearson if Hamlin ordered the not guilty verdict "recorded" immediately after the jurors nodded in agreement with the verdict.

Judges are required to poll jurors after every verdict is read in criminal cases, Hyman said.

Associated Press writer Paul Elias in San Francisco contributed to this report.






 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(12)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
DownSpout wrote:
Seems like a win-win situation.
on June 12,2014 | 03:38PM
Tarakian wrote:
Talk about miscommunication and the need for clarity! Aside from the released criminal's family's loss, not to many people will be sad for this criminal not burglarizing their homes again.
on June 12,2014 | 03:59PM
Grimbold wrote:
Maybe the jury composition was the same peers.
on June 12,2014 | 07:24PM
Ronin006 wrote:
Justice has been served.
on June 12,2014 | 04:21PM
iwanaknow wrote:
can we do a do over? or hit the re-set button? or a hana hoe?
on June 12,2014 | 04:47PM
kainalu wrote:
And this is newsworthy why?
on June 12,2014 | 06:35PM
HOSSANA wrote:
and just where did the jurors get their education...well, right here in good old USA!!!
on June 12,2014 | 07:16PM
soundofreason wrote:
Still looking for the downside to all this.
on June 12,2014 | 07:20PM
Grimbold wrote:
Birds of a feather..
on June 12,2014 | 07:23PM
paradiddle wrote:
Bizzarre story is right! But here is one possible downside. His family will sue because the mistake resulted in his being freed by error and that lead to his death. Bets anyone?
on June 13,2014 | 05:25AM
BuhByeAloha wrote:
Come on everyone, why such negativity towards this exceptional young man? He could be a fine citizen besides the long rap sheet. Who knows, maybe he could have been released and Obama could have given him a helping hand (our taxes) and turned his life around. I'm sure he would have used the money for college, worked hard, and joined the workforce to help restore this country to greatness.
on June 13,2014 | 06:12AM
joeglick wrote:
What was the Florida jury doing in Fresno California?
on June 13,2014 | 04:13PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News