Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

U.S. missile defense system unreliable in tests

By Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 10:05 a.m. HST, Jun 15, 2014

VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. >> The U.S. missile defense system can't be relied on to hit its targets even in scripted tests a decade after it was declared operational and despite $40 billion spent, according to a newspaper's investigation.

The Los Angeles Times found that officials overstated the reliability of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, or GMD.

The missile shield system was supposed to protect Americans from attacks by "rogue states" like North Korea and Iran, but it has failed in half of the tests conducted to determine its ability to intercept a mock enemy warhead. In fact, despite years of vows to fix technical shortcomings, the system's performance has grown worse since testing began in 1999.

Dean A. Wilkening, a physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, has called the system's test record abysmal.

He served on a National Academy of Sciences panel that issued a 2011 report on missile defense and said at a May 28 policy conference in Washington, D.C., that GMD was a "prototype system" that "performed less well than people had hoped" and "one shouldn't be too surprised that it does tend to fail more than you'd like."

Philip E. Coyle III, who was the Pentagon's director of operational testing and evaluation from 1994 to 2001 and oversaw several early test flights, said that even successful tests should be viewed skeptically because conditions are staged.

"The tests are scripted for success," Coyle said. "What's amazing to me is that they still fail."

Another test is scheduled at California's Vandenberg Air Force Base later this month. The system has 30 interceptors including four at Vandenberg and 26 at Fort Greely in Alaska.

Instead of rigorously testing the system, it was rushed into the field in 2002 under President George W. Bush. The Obama administration now supports expanding it by deploying 14 new interceptors at Fort Greely by late 2017.

A Missile Defense Agency spokesman said in a statement the agency was working to improve its reliability. The agency's director Vice Adm. James D. Syring told a Senate subcommittee last week that the underlying problems in two recent flight-test failures had been identified and already fixed or would be fixed by year's end.

Boeing spokesman Dexter Q. Henson said the company "remains confident in the system's ability to defeat potential adversaries."

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
entrkn wrote:
If Boeing's F-35 performs like their GMD system, America will have flushed huge amounts of taxpayer money down the Boeing toilet and will be left completely vulnerable.
on June 15,2014 | 10:19AM
false wrote:
Ummm. Wrong! The F-35 is made by Lockheed.
on June 15,2014 | 03:21PM
eoe wrote:
Is this a surprise? Everyone was scratching their heads when Bush deployed this thing, it didnt work then it doesnt work now. But of course the faux news rabble thinks it works, and so therefore it does, so any talk of getting rid of a non-working system is of course traitorous and means you hate America.
on June 15,2014 | 12:14PM
FluidMotion wrote:
Good idea, lets scrap a system that shoots down only half the missiles and replace it with liberal ideology that shoots down none.
on June 15,2014 | 05:42PM
OldDiver wrote:
These are nuclear missiles. Only one needs to get past this useless missile defense system to be a failure. As it is "ONE" is the number that will likely get shot down.
on June 15,2014 | 09:05PM
HD36 wrote:
The neocon doctrine of American imperialism and hegemony believes in a pre-emptive first strike nuclear attack on Russia or China and the missile shield would protect us from a counter attack. Even if there was no counter attack, scientist say the sun would be blocked out by dust for about 3 years if just 1% of the nuclear missiles were used.
on June 15,2014 | 01:11PM
sailfish1 wrote:
Just make sure that our ICBMs and sub launched nuclear missiles are accurate and fully operational. That is our real deterrent to any country bent on launching a nuclear weapon against the U.S.
on June 15,2014 | 10:10PM
Breaking News
Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings

Small Talk
Burning money

Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout