Wednesday, July 30, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Expert: Guam man was insane when he killed tourists

By Grace Garces Bordallo

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 12:00 p.m. HST, Jul 09, 2014

HAGATNA, Guam >> The final defense witness in the murder trial of a man charged with killing three Japanese tourists in a Guam resort area testified that the defendant was insane during last year's rampage.

Chad Ryan DeSoto plunged into a downward spiral of psychotic depression after the loss of two anchors in his life: his grandfather who died and his girlfriend who lived in Utah, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Martin Blinder testified Wednesday.

DeSoto, 22, is charged with aggravated murder, accused of running a car onto a sidewalk, ramming into a convenience store, then getting out and stabbing bystanders. Kazuko Uehara, 81, and Rie Sugiyama, 29, were stabbed to death. Hitoshi Yokota, 51, was hit by a car and died in a hospital two days later. Another 11 people were hurt in the February 2013 attack.

"From a purely clinical perspective, there is no possible alternative explanation that I can come up with to explain why he did what he did except that he was operating, he was driven by a psychosis and this psychosis drove out the good parts of him -- the parts that would know this is not acceptable," Blinder said. "He had no capacity to weigh these thoughts. His mind was no longer functioning like a normal person. His mind was functioning like an insane person."

Blinder said several times during his testimony that DeSoto is crazy.

DeSoto has pleaded not guilty by reason of mental illness. The defense rested its case after Blinder's testimony.

Prosecutors were expected to call five rebuttal witnesses Thursday.

The judge had yet to rule on a motion accusing DeSoto of witness tampering and obstruction of justice. Prosecutors said he inappropriately spoke with two witnesses from jail.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
HanabataDays wrote:
Clearly he's not pupule now, so he must've been pupule then. A last ditch defense.
on July 9,2014 | 12:15PM
sailfish1 wrote:
Does an insane person put a knife into his car and then drive to a tourist area to carry out his killings? He knew what he was doing. A true insane person would most likely killed people in his own neighborhood.
on July 9,2014 | 12:26PM
Jonas wrote:
Thought that killing people is pretty much the definition of insane.
on July 9,2014 | 01:37PM
kuewa wrote:
The acceptance of insanity pleas as a defense is what's insane. In the end, innocent people lost their lives.How does the recognition of insanity during the deed make it better for the victim or remove guilt from the perpetrator? And most all, I'd like to know how much these "experts" are paid to determine that a person running amok and killing people is insane. I wish I had that kind of career, getting paid for stating the obvious.
on July 9,2014 | 02:29PM
Breaking News