Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

State Senate approves PLDC repeal, House to vote

By Anita Hofschneider

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 12:26 a.m. HST, Apr 10, 2013

State House Majority Leader Scott Saiki says it is highly likely that his chamber will agree to a bill that would dissolve the state's Public Land Development Corp., bringing the widely disliked agency one step closer to its demise.

Opponents of the state land agency have been clamoring for its repeal since the first day of the legislative session in January when they protested at the state Capitol.

The state land agency was created in 2011 to raise revenue by developing unused state lands through public-private partnerships. But the agency has been widely criticized for its power to override county permitting and zoning rules.

Opponents fear that the agency's power could lead to unbridled development and ignore the wishes of local communities. They also say that it was established without enough public input.

Both the state House and Senate voted earlier this session to abolish the agency in response to the overwhelming criticism, but disagreed on the details.

The Senate originally wanted to keep the agency's three staff members by transferring them to the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, but the House objected.

The Senate voted Tuesday to adopt a draft of the repeal that gets rid of the agency and conforms to the House version.

Sen. David Ige, chairman of the Senate Ways and Means Committee, says the bill is a "clean repeal" that doesn't have substantive differences with the House draft. There are some minor changes such as the addition of a section explaining why the law is necessary.

The House is expected to vote on the measure Thursday. Approval would clear for the way for it to be sent to the governor without further debate.

If the House disagrees, the bill could be sent to a committee made up of both senators and representatives for further debate.

Critics of the land agency fear that the legislation could stall while in conference committee or be substantially weakened.

Opponents also say that it was established without enough public input. They say that abolishing the organization entirely is the only way to restore public trust.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Maneki_Neko wrote:
We will believe the PLDC is dead when we see it with a stake through its heart meaning the repeal is passed and the legislative session ended.

Beware of this going into conference committee out of the sight of the public eye and then coming back in some other, evil format.


on April 9,2013 | 03:54PM
bender wrote:
And it still has to get past one of the biggest advocates, that being the Governor. Wonder why the Senate wanted to keep the 3 PLDC guys on the state payroll?
on April 10,2013 | 05:40AM
false wrote:
This should have never happened last year in the first place. The house and senate just shoved this down everyone's throats. Look what happened though we re-elected the same old people, go figure that one out.
on April 9,2013 | 04:00PM
Breaking News
Wassup Wit Dat!
Bettah Not Lose It

Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings

Small Talk
Burning money

Political Radar
On policy