Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 17, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

U.S. says North Korea capable of arming ballistic missile with nuke

By Robert Burns & Julie Pace

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 02:33 p.m. HST, Apr 11, 2013



WASHINGTON >> A U.S. intelligence report concludes that North Korea has advanced its nuclear knowhow to the point that it could arm a ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead, a jarring revelation in the midst of bellicose threats from the unpredictable communist regime. 

President Barack Obama urged calm, calling on Pyongyang to end its saber-rattling while sternly warning that he would “take all necessary steps” to protect American citizens. 

The new American intelligence analysis, disclosed today at a hearing on Capitol Hill, says the Pentagon’s intelligence wing has “moderate confidence” that North Korea has nuclear weapons capable of delivery by ballistic missiles but that the weapon was unreliable.

Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., read aloud what he said was an unclassified paragraph from a secret Defense Intelligence Agency report that was supplied to some members of Congress. The reading seemed to take Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, by surprise, who said he hadn’t seen the report and declined to answer questions about it.

In a statement late today, Pentagon press secretary George Little said: “While I cannot speak to all the details of a report that is classified in its entirety, it would be inaccurate to suggest that the North Korean regime has fully tested, developed or demonstrated the kinds of nuclear capabilities referenced” in Lamborn’s remarks. 

‘“The United States continues to closely monitor the North Korean nuclear program and calls upon North Korea to honor its international obligations,” Little added.

The DIA conclusion was confirmed by a senior congressional aide who spoke on condition of anonymity because the Pentagon had not officially released the contents. The aide said the report was produced in March.

Since the beginning of March, the Navy has moved two missile defense ships closer to the coast of the Korean peninsula, in part to protect against a potential missile launch aimed at Guam, a U.S. territory in the Pacific. The Pentagon also has announced it will place a more advanced land-based missile defense on Guam, and Hagel said in March that he approved installing 14 additional missile interceptors in Alaska to bolster a portion of the missile defense network that is designed to protect all of U.S. territory. 

Today, the Pentagon said it had moved a sea-based X-band radar — designed to track warheads in flight — into position in the Pacific.

Notably absent from that unclassified segment of the report was any reference to what the DIA believes is the range of a missile North Korea could arm with a nuclear warhead. Much of its missile arsenal is capable of reaching South Korea and Japan, but Kim has threatened to attack the United States as well.

At the House Armed Services Committee hearing in which he revealed the DIA assessment, Lamborn asked Dempsey, whether he agreed with it. Dempsey said he had not seen the report.

“You said it’s not publicly released, so I choose not to comment on it,” Dempsey said.

But David Wright, a nuclear weapons expert at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the DIA assessment probably does not change the views of those who closely follow developments in North Korea’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon.

“People are starting to believe North Korea very likely has the capability to build a nuclear weapon small enough to put on some of their shorter-range missiles,” Wright said. “Once you start talking about warheads small enough and technically capable to be on a long-range missile, I think it’s much more an open question.”

The DIA assessment is not out of line with comments Dempsey made Wednesday when he was asked at a Pentagon news conference whether North Korea was capable of pairing a nuclear warhead to a ballistic missile that could reach Japan or beyond.

In response, Dempsey said the extent of North Korean progress on designing a nuclear weapon small enough to operate as a missile warhead was a classified matter. But he did not rule out that the North has achieved the capability revealed in the DIA report.

“They have conducted two nuclear tests,” Dempsey told a Pentagon news conference. “They have conducted several successful ballistic missile launches. And in the absence of concrete evidence to the contrary, we have to assume the worst case, and that’s why we’re postured as we are today.” He was referring to recent moves by the U.S. to increase its missile defense capabilities in the Pacific.

At the same House hearing where Lamborn revealed the DIA conclusion, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel was asked a different version of the same question: Does North Korea have the capability to strike U.S. territory with a nuclear weapon? Hagel said the answer is no.

“Now does that mean that they won’t have it or they can’t have it or they’re not working on it?” Hagel added. “No. That’s why this is a very dangerous situation.”

“Now is the time for North Korea to end the belligerent approach they have taken and to try to lower temperatures,” Obama said in his first public comments since Pyongyang threatened the United States and its allies in East Asia with nuclear attack. 

Obama, speaking from the Oval Office, said he preferred to see the tensions on the peninsula resolved through diplomatic means, but added that “the United States will take all necessary steps to protect its people.”

The North today delivered a fresh round of war rhetoric with claims it has “powerful striking means” on standby, the latest in a torrent of warlike threats seen by outsiders as an effort to scare and pressure South Korea and the U.S. into changing their North Korea policies.

Lamborn is a member of the Strategic Forces subcommittee of the Armed Services panel, which oversees ballistic missiles. A former state legislator who was elected to the House in 2006, was a member of the Tea Party caucus and belongs to the Republican Study Committee, the caucus of House conservatives

At a separate hearing today, U.S. officials offered their assessment of the North Korean leader, who is a grandson of the country’s founder, Kim Il Sung.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the House Intelligence Committee that he thinks Kim, who took control after his father, Kim Jong Il, died in 2011, is trying to show the U.S., the world and his own people that he is “firmly in control in North Korea,” while attempting to maneuver the international community into concessions in future negotiations.

“I don’t think ... he has much of an endgame other than to somehow elicit recognition” and to turn the nuclear threat into “negotiation and to accommodation and presumably for aid,” Clapper said.

Clapper said that the intelligence community believes the North would use nuclear weapons only to preserve the Kim regime but that analysts do not know how the regime defines that.

Secretary of State John Kerry was headed today to East Asia, where he planned talks with officials in Seoul, Beijing and Tokyo about North Korea.

———

Associated Press writers Kimberly Dozier, Sagar Meghani and Donna Cassata contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(8)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
blkdrgn wrote:
Well let's just hope they don't fire a missile at us when the Government is on furlough.
on April 11,2013 | 11:08AM
false wrote:
Every day it's a different story on the war-making capability of North Korea. Fact is, we don't know what their capability is. Today the guessing is that they may have a nuclear tipped missile. But, they say, it wouldn't be reliable. Good to hear, but this is only today's assessment. Tomorrow may be different. I'm definitely not a hawk when it comes to war, but a country like North Korea is like a schoolyard bully. The only way his behavior will change is when he has the wind knocked out of him. If South Korea were more like Israel, North Korea's nuclear program would have ceased to be a problem 20 years ago.
on April 11,2013 | 11:44AM
OldDiver wrote:
The N Korea war hype is being brought to you by those who profit from making machines of war. All in a effort to save military budget cuts at the expense of education, Social Security and Medicare.
on April 11,2013 | 12:07PM
hon2255 wrote:
Old Diver, you missed the point, which is N Korea wants concessions on trade and aid , by their method which is bullying and threatening their immediate neighbors S Korea and Japan, The rest of the world is passing them by due to their imposed isolationism imposed by their dictatorship. This was not brought about by Lockheed or Boeing. So get your head out of the sand and wake up!
on April 11,2013 | 12:52PM
livinginhawaii wrote:
What is going on with the Obama administration? They keep changing the story - the other week they said North Korea was a few years away from being able to launch a nuclear missile. Now they are suggesting that they may already have the technology. Sounds like Obama's team is either not focusing on intelligence or is dangerously incompetent...
on April 11,2013 | 01:17PM
Bothrops wrote:
it appears it was a Republican leaking a classified document who changed the story. The intelligence community may not be in agreement. And we should be cautious, remember Saddam's weapons of mass destruction? That's why you don't rush to judgement.
on April 11,2013 | 06:59PM
entrkn wrote:
unacceptable
on April 11,2013 | 04:52PM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
if we attacked north korea, they would use the nukes
on April 11,2013 | 10:29PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News