Quantcast

Thursday, July 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Many causes for dramatic bee disappearance, feds say

By Seth Borenstein

AP Science Writer

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 10:37 a.m. HST, May 02, 2013


WASHINGTON » A new federal report blames a combination of problems for a mysterious and dramatic disappearance of U.S. honeybees since 2006.

The intertwined factors cited include a parasitic mite, multiple viruses, bacteria, poor nutrition, genetics, habitat loss and pesticides.

The multiple causes make it harder to do something about what's called colony collapse disorder, experts say. The disorder has caused as much as one-third of the nation's bees to just disappear each winter since 2006.

Bees, especially honeybees, are needed to pollinate crops.

The federal report, issued today by the Agriculture Department and the Environmental Protection Agency, said the biggest culprit is the parasitic mite varroa destructor, calling it "the single most detrimental pest of honeybees."

The problem has also hit bee colonies in Europe, where regulators are considering a ban on a type of pesticides known as neonicotinoids that some environmental groups blame for the bee collapse. The U.S. report cites pesticides, but near the bottom of the list of factors. And federal officials and researchers advising them said the science doesn't justify a ban of the pesticides yet.

May Berenbaum, a top bee researcher from the University of Illinois, said in an interview that she was "extremely dubious" that banning the pesticide would have any effect on bee health. She participated in a large conference of scientists that the government brought together last year to figure out what's going on, and the new report is the result of that conference.

Berenbaum said more than 100 different chemicals — not just the pesticides that may be banned in Europe — have been found in bee colonies. Scientists find it hard to calculate how they react in different dosages and at different combinations, she said.

Some of these chemicals harm the immune systems of bees or amplify viruses, said Penn State University bee expert Diana Cox-Foster.

At a news conference today, Sonny Ramaswamy, a top USDA official, said the scientific consensus is that there are multiple factors "and you can't parse any one out to be the smoking gun."

USDA bee researcher Jeff Pettis also cited modern farming practices that often leave little forage area for bees.

Dave Gaulson of the University of Stirling in Scotland, who conducted a study last year that implicated the chemical, said he can't disagree with the overall conclusions of the U.S. government report. However, he said it could have emphasized pesticides more.

The environmental group, Pesticide Action Network North America blasted the federal government for not following Europe's lead in looking at a ban of certain pesticides.

Pollinators, like honeybees, are crucial to the U.S. food supply. About $30 billion a year in agriculture depends on their health, said Ramaswamy.

Besides making honey, honeybees pollinate more than 90 flowering crops. Among them are a variety of fruits and vegetables: apples, nuts, avocados, soybeans, asparagus, broccoli, citrus fruit and cranberries. About one-third of the human diet comes from insect-pollinated plants, and the honeybee is responsible for 80 percent of that pollination.

"It affects virtually every American whether they realize it or not," said EPA acting administrator Bob Perciasepe.

Zac Browning, a fourth-generation commercial beekeeper who has hives in Idaho, North Dakota and California, said the nation is "on the brink" of not having enough bees to pollinate its crops.

University of Maryland entomologist David Inouye, who was not part of the federal report, said he agrees that there are multiple causes.

"It's not a simple situation. If it were one factor we would have identified it by now," he said.

Inouye, president-elect of the Ecological Society of America, said the problems in Europe and United States may be slightly different. In America, bee hives are trucked from farm to farm to pollinate large tracts of land and that may help spread the parasites and disease, as well as add stress to the colonies, while in Europe they stay put so those issues may not be as big a factor.

At the news conference, Berenbaum said there's no single solution to the U.S. bee problem: "We're not really well equipped or even used to fighting on multiple fronts."

___

Online:

The report: http://www.usda.gov/documents/ReportHoneyBeeHealth.pdf







 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(4)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
UhhDuhh wrote:
Mary Berenbaum is obviously getting paid off by the pesticide companies. Even if you doubt the effect of pesticides on bees, test it anyway because there is a problem. Beautiful unblemished produce today versus no produce tomorrow. Stupid lady.
on May 2,2013 | 11:12AM
Hawaiians wrote:
GMO is one of the causes...
on May 2,2013 | 11:19AM
burymeagain wrote:
Yeah, we got to start GMOing the bees.
on May 2,2013 | 01:23PM
kauai wrote:
During World War II, the British were trying to increase the survivability of aircraft and crew by examing the returning planes and noting where the aircraft was damaged (e.g. bullet holes, etc.). They armored/reinforced those damaged areas of the planes prior to sending them out on further missions. The survivability rates were unchanged. An engineer/researcher then thought that if the armoring/reinforcing was performed on the undamaged area of the aircraft, more planes would survive. The logic being that the planes that returned with damages were hit in non-vital areas and thus able to survive. Those planes that did not return, therefore, were damaged in critical areas with caused their destruction. To make a long story short, the Brits began armoring/reinforcing areas of the aircraft that did not sustain damage and viola', more planes and crew survived to return from their missions. Perhaps it's not the detected chemicals, etc. found in the bee colonies that are the culprit. Perhaps it is what's NOT detected that is the problem. Just my long-winded 2-cents worth....
on May 2,2013 | 11:34AM
residenttaxpayer wrote:
Sounds like the goverment is guessing because they don't really know....
on May 2,2013 | 04:03PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News