Quantcast

Thursday, July 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groups

By Stephen Ohlemacher

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 08:19 a.m. HST, May 10, 2013


WASHINGTON » The Internal Revenue Service inappropriately flagged conservative political groups for additional reviews during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status, a top IRS official said today.

Organizations were singled out because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups.

In some cases, groups were asked for their list of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said.

"That was wrong. That was absolutely incorrect, it was insensitive and it was inappropriate. That's not how we go about selecting cases for further review," Lerner said at a conference sponsored by the American Bar Association.

"The IRS would like to apologize for that," she added.

Lerner said the practice was initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati and was not motivated by political bias. After her talk, she told The AP that no high level IRS officials knew about the practice. She did not say when they found out.

About 75 groups were inappropriately targeted. None had their tax-exempt status revoked, Lerner said.

Many conservative groups complained during the election that they were being harassed by the IRS. They accused the agency of frustrating their attempts to become tax exempt by sending them lengthy, intrusive questionnaires.

The forms, which the groups made available at the time, sought information about group members' political activities, including details of their postings on social networking websites and about family members.

Certain tax-exempt charitable groups can conduct political activities but it cannot be their primary activity.

IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman told Congress in March 2012 that the IRS was not targeting groups based on their political views.

"There's absolutely no targeting. This is the kind of back and forth that happens to people" who apply for tax-exempt status, Shulman told a House Ways and Means subcommittee.

Shulman was appointed by President George W. Bush. His 6-year term ended in November. President Barack Obama has yet to nominate a successor. The agency is now being run by acting Commissioner Steven Miller.

"I don't think there's any question we were unfairly targeted," said Tom Zawistowski, who until recently was president of the Ohio Liberty Coalition, an alliance of tea party groups in the state.

Zawistowski's group was among many conservative organizations that battled the IRS over what they saw as its discriminatory treatment of their effort to gain non-profit status. The group first applied for non-profit status in June 2009, and it was finally granted on Dec. 7, 2012, he said — one month after Election Day.

During the 2012 election, many tea party groups applied for tax-exempt status under section 501 (c) (4) of the federal tax code, which grants tax-exempt status to social welfare groups. Unlike other charitable groups, these organizations are allowed to participate in political activities but their primary activity must be social welfare.

That determination is up to the IRS.

Lerner said the number of groups filing for this tax-exempt status more than doubled from 2010 to 2012, to more than 3,400. To handle the influx, the IRS centralized its review of these applications in an office in Cincinnati.

Lerner said this was done to develop expertise among staffers and consistency in their reviews. As part of the review, staffers look for signs that groups are participating in political activity. If so, IRS agents take a closer look to make sure that politics isn't the group's primary activity, Lerner said.

As part of this process, agents in Cincinnati came up with a list of things to look for in an application. As part of the list, they included the words, "tea party" and "patriot," Lerner said.

"It's the line people that did it without talking to managers," Lerner. "They're IRS workers, they're revenue agents."

In all, about 300 groups were singled out for additional review, Lerner said. Of those, about a quarter were singled out because they had "tea party" or "patriot" somewhere in their applications.

Lerner said 150 of the cases have been closed and no group had its tax-exempt status revoked, though some withdrew their applications.

Tea Party groups weren't buying the idea that the decision to target them was solely the responsibility of low-level IRS workers.

"It is suspicious that the activity of these 'low-level workers' was unknown to IRS leadership at the time it occurred," said Jenny Beth Martin, national coordinator for Tea Party Patriots, which describes itself as the nation's largest tea party organization. "President Obama must also apologize for his administration ignoring repeated complaints by these broad grassroots organizations of harassment by the IRS in 2012, and make concrete and transparent steps today to ensure this never happens again."

Associated Press reporters Alan Fram and Steve Peoples in Boston contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(9)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
newsjunky1 wrote:
a ll the groups targeted were conservative yet they deny there was political bias? How can that be? And of course, no one at the top, no one who is supposedly in charge, knew about this. A bunch of low-level, unsupervised employees just took it upon themselves to do this. This is your IRS, folks. Free to do as they like.
on May 10,2013 | 08:34AM
serious wrote:
I doubt that they did this without "word from the top"---it was an election year!!! I noticed no Acorn groups???
on May 10,2013 | 09:36AM
stanmanley wrote:
I was thinking the samething. In addition, these low level workers are still employed with no suspension, probation or loss of employement. Amazing how much you can get away with being a Govt. employee.
on May 10,2013 | 10:02AM
lee1957 wrote:
Start with the first line supervisor and move up, but somebody's head needs to roll.
on May 10,2013 | 10:05AM
AhiPoke wrote:
When you consider that we still don't have any answers about Benghazi, why would you expect this administration trying to get to the bottom of this? Remember how obama and clinton kept saying last October that their investigation was still going on? Has it been completed yet?
on May 10,2013 | 12:23PM
entrkn wrote:
... well, they got me too, and I am not a conservative or in the Tea party.
on May 10,2013 | 10:33AM
phyllum69 wrote:
"It's the line people that did it without talking to managers," Lerner. "They're IRS workers, they're revenue agents." And, what, no heads rolling?
on May 10,2013 | 11:23AM
Anonymous wrote:
This investigation will go absolutely nowhere. Just the typical denial, promises to "get to the bottom of this", stone-walling by the MSM, smoke and mirrors that have come to define this administration. Liberty and Justice for all? Not from the purveyors of "Hope" and "Change".
on May 10,2013 | 01:18PM
Pacej001 wrote:
Maybe not. However, the onion is starting to unreel. AP reports senior IRS supervisors were aware as early as 2011.
on May 11,2013 | 11:35AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News