Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Motorcycle injuries worsen with weaker helmet law

By Joan Lowy

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 01:02 p.m. HST, May 30, 2013

WASHINGTON » The average medical claim from a motorcycle crash rose by more than one-fifth last year in Michigan after the state stopped requiring all riders to wear helmets, according to an insurance industry study. Across the nation, motorcyclists opposed to mandatory helmet use have been chipping away at state helmet laws for years while crash deaths have been on the rise.

For more than 40 years, Michigan required all motorcycle riders to wear helmets. State legislators changed the law last year so that only riders younger than 21 must wear helmets. The average insurance payment on a motorcycle injury claim was $5,410 in the two years before the law was changed, and $7,257 after it was changed — an increase of 34 percent, the study by the Highway Loss Data Institute found.

After adjusting for the age and type of motorcycle, rider age, gender, marital status, weather and other factors, the actual increase was about 22 percent relative to a group of four comparative states, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Wisconsin, the study found.

"The cost per injury claim is significantly higher after the law changed than before, which is consistent with other research that shows riding without a helmet leads to more head injuries," David Zuby, chief research officer for the data institute and an affiliated organization, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, said. The data institute publishes insurance loss statistics on most car, SUV, pickup truck and motorcycle models on U.S. roads.

While other studies have shown an increase motorcycle deaths after states eliminate or weaken mandatory helmet requirements, the industry study is the first to look specifically at the effect of repealing helmet requirements on the severity of injuries as measured by medical insurance claims, Zuby said.

Some states have sought to mitigate the repeal or loosening of mandatory helmet laws by setting minimum medical insurance requirements, but "that doesn't even come close to covering the lifelong care of somebody who is severely brain-injured and who cannot work and who is going to be on Medicaid and a ward of the state," Jackie Gillan, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, which backs mandatory helmet requirements for all riders, said.

Jeff Hennie, vice president of the Motorcycle Riders Foundation, dismissed the study, saying the insurance industry views helmets as "the silver bullet that's going to change the landscape of motorcycle safety." He said insurers are upset because "life has gotten more expensive for them and they have to pay out more."

"The fact is our highways are bloody," Hennie said. "This (the Michigan helmet law change) doesn't make helmets illegal. ... No one is forcing anyone to ride without a helmet."

Vince Consiglio, president of American Bikers Aimed Toward Education of Michigan, blamed the increase in the severity of injuries on bikers who don't take safety courses required to obtain a special motorcycle license. He said bikers without motorcycle licenses have made up an increasingly larger share of fatalities and injuries in recent years.

But Gillan said the study "clearly shows there is no such thing as a free ride, and the public is paying the cost for this."

There's no way to know how many of the Michigan claims involved motorcyclists not wearing helmets, the study said. But another recent study by the University of Michigan's Transportation Research Institute found a significant increase in motorcyclists involved in crashes who weren't wearing helmets after the law changed. From April 13, 2012, the first full day after the change took effect, through the end of the year, 74 percent of motorcyclists involved in crashes were wearing helmets, compared with 98 percent in the same period for the previous four years, the study found.

Nationally, motorcycle deaths have risen in 14 of the past 15 years, with more than 5,000 deaths last year, according to an analysis by the Governors Highway Safety Association of preliminary 2012 data. That's the highest proportion motorcycles have ever represented of overall traffic deaths, more than 14 percent, the association said.

Currently, 19 states and the District of Columbia require all motorcyclists to wear a helmet, 28 states require only some motorcyclists — usually younger or novice riders — to wear a helmet, and three states have no helmet use law. States have been gradually repealing or weakening mandatory helmet laws for nearly two decades.

In 1967, to increase motorcycle helmet use, the federal government required that states enact helmet laws in order to qualify for certain federal safety programs and highway construction aid. The federal incentive worked. By the early 1970s, almost all states had motorcycle helmet laws that covered all riders. In 1976, Congress stopped the Transportation Department from assessing financial penalties on states without helmet laws, and state lawmakers began repealing the statutes.

In 1991, Congress created new incentives for states to enact helmet and seat belt laws, but reversed itself four years later.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which sent observers to states last year to count how many motorcyclists wore helmets, found that 97 percent of motorcyclists in states with universal helmet laws were wearing helmets compared with 58 percent of motorcyclists in states without such coverage.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
ambulanceguy wrote:
Many people are convinced that they are bulletproof, and don't need to protect themselves in a dangerous situation. Motorcycle helmets are not totally effective, but they can help to keep your brain inside your skull. I'm sure that soldiers would prefer not to wear body armor in combat, but they are smart enough to understand what it does. Maybe it's ok for those without a brain to begin with to not wear a helmet, as it is much cheaper for them to die on impact than to make everyone else pay for their new role as a vegetable. This isn't a game. People should be willing to use common sense, but if they won't, then they may just be lying in the bed they made for themselves for many years, wishing (if they can still think) about the life they might have had if they had not felt such a strong need to look "cool" and show everyone how independent they are. You only get one chance in life... there are no "do overs".
on May 30,2013 | 02:05PM
fairgame947 wrote:
I really don't like the government to regulate my life. I need to exercise common sense and if I don't, I suffer the consequences. Personal responsibility seems to have gone the wayside. Seems like insurance companies could require helmets and if their insureds don't use, then no insurance payout. Same with seatbelts, etc. My Mom spent 8 weeks in a trauma ward (not a helmet issue) and every other bed in an 8 bed ward, was occupied by a motorcyle rider who didn't wear a helmet. I know the riders say it takes away the "full experience" but so does spending the rest of your life unable to ride anything!
on May 30,2013 | 02:32PM
mikethenovice wrote:
No wonder healthcare insurance is so expensive. The dummies who fall off the bikes have as much rights as the rest of us.
on May 30,2013 | 03:15PM
lew4543 wrote:
Strange...my medical costs have risen over the last 2 years also and I haven't been involved in an accident. Just regular routine doctor visits. could it be inflation is causing the rise in medical costs and not the fact that there is no helmet law ???
on May 30,2013 | 03:12PM
mikethenovice wrote:
When it comes to regulating motorcycles, the first rule should be curbing those noisy exhaust. Whether the operator wants to don a helmet doesn't bother the rest of us while we sleep.
on May 30,2013 | 03:14PM
mikethenovice wrote:
Common sense says to stay away from exposing yourself at 60MPH on a bike against the impact of two tons of steel.
on May 30,2013 | 03:18PM
Breaking News