Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Outraged lawmakers address military sexual assault

By Donna Cassata & Richard Lardner

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 10:11 a.m. HST, Jun 05, 2013


WASHINGTON » The outcry over the epidemic of sexual assaults in the military is spurring Congress to act, with a House panel moving ahead today on stripping commanders of the ability to overturn convictions in rape and assault cases.

The legislation is part of a sweeping defense policy bill that the House Armed Services Committee methodically pulled together during a daylong session expected to last past midnight. The $638 billion measure for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 included $86 billion for the war in Afghanistan as well as contentious provisions on the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and nuclear weapons.

The full House is expected to vote on the bill next week.

"It is paramount that we protect those who protect our nation," said Rep. Adam Smith of Washington state, the top Democrat on the committee. At the same time, Smith acknowledged that legislation alone will not solve the problem, and the military needs to address the inherent cultural problems in the services.

The Pentagon estimated in a recent report that as many as 26,000 military members may have been sexually assaulted last year, up from an estimated 19,000 assaults in 2011, based on an anonymous survey of military personnel.

While the number of sexual assaults that members of the military actually reported rose 6 percent to 3,374 in 2012, thousands of victims were still unwilling to come forward despite new oversight and assistance programs aimed at curbing the crimes, the report said.

Despite the congressional clamor to cut the deficit, the committee bill rejects several Pentagon attempts to save money. The panel spares a version of the Global Hawk unmanned aircraft, rebuffs attempts to increase health care fees for retirees and their dependents and opposes another round of domestic base closures.

In fact, the panel didn't just say no to more base closings, it went as far as including a provision barring the Pentagon from even planning for another round.

That drew ridicule from Smith, who offered an amendment essentially eliminating the prohibition on the Pentagon thinking ahead. Smith said it made no sense to tie the Pentagon's hands as it faces smaller budgets.

"I don't think this committee has the luxury of being so darn parochial anymore, to say every single time any one of the (military) services comes into our state and says, 'Look, we've got to rearrange,' that we're going to fight tooth-and-nail to stop them," Smith said.

Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., supported Smith's effort, complaining that as the Pentagon tries to determine excess bases, Congress is saying "we don't even want to know."

But some Republicans argued that they didn't want the Pentagon wasting time planning something that Congress would never accept.

The panel planned to vote on the amendment later in the day.

Overall, the bill fails to acknowledge the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts that Washington has grudgingly accepted. The cuts of $41 billion hit the Pentagon on March 1, forced the military to furlough workers and scale back training.

The Pentagon faces deeper reductions in projected spending of close to $1 trillion over a decade, but the bill did not reflect that reality for next fiscal year. The Pentagon likely will have to cut $54 billion to meet the numbers dictated by the so-called sequester.

The committee's action came one day after a high-profile Senate hearing on sexual assault in which senators grilled military leaders about the scourge in their ranks. The leaders conceded that they have been less than diligent in dealing with the problem, but pushed back against far-reaching legislation to give the authority to level charges to a military prosecutor rather than the victim's commander.

Military leaders are more receptive to the House effort by Reps. Michael Turner, R-Ohio, and Niki Tsongas, D-Mass. Their measure, which the full committee was considering today, would strip commanders of the discretion to reverse a court-martial ruling, except in cases involving minor offenses. Commanders also would be barred from reducing a guilty finding by a court-martial to guilty of a lesser offense.

The measure also would require that anyone found guilty of rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy or an attempt to commit any of those offenses receive a punishment that includes a dismissal from military service or a dishonorable discharge.

The legislation eliminates the five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for sexual assault and sexual assault of a child. It also establishes the authority for military legal counsel to provide legal assistance to victims of sex-related offenses and requires enhanced training for all military and civilian attorneys involved in sex-related cases.

Separately, the House Appropriations defense subcommittee was meeting behind closed doors to vote on a defense spending bill that contains $513 billion for core Pentagon operations and $86 billion for operations in Afghanistan.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(7)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
sayer wrote:
Love Senator Gillibrand! It looks like they might actually do something to finally address this very serious issue. As a reminder though, it's not jus about women. Thousands of men are sexually assaulted in the military each year too.
on June 5,2013 | 06:36AM
serious wrote:
On these panels, the legislators can say anything they want because they have complete amnesty from slander, perjury, etc. But on the other side they can be prosecuted. That's why the senators seem so bold--but if they were on the other side?????? I wish we had some senators who actually served in the military and not just read about it. Just imagine if the federal legislators were under the same rules as the military---adultery in the military is a crime!! We'd have no one in Congress!!!
on June 5,2013 | 08:45AM
residenttaxpayer wrote:
"The military leaders were unified in opposing the legislation, warning that limits on commanders' authority would undercut their ability to preserve good order and discipline in their units".....seems as though the command has already lost control to maintain order and discipline and since they have dropped the ball...that authority should be taken away and given to outside of their chain of command.
on June 5,2013 | 07:54AM
mrluke wrote:
If you think things are messed up now, just see what happens if you break up the chain of command and control. It'll affect every phase of order and discipline.
on June 5,2013 | 08:05AM
mrluke wrote:
This is a problem that needs to be addressed, but not by Congress persons looking for face time on the news.
on June 5,2013 | 08:06AM
residenttaxpayer wrote:
Its highly unlikely it will be fixed by the chain of command since they have already demostrated they tend to take care of their own and cover up or sweep it under the rug...
on June 5,2013 | 08:21AM
localguy wrote:
Hypocrisy knows no limits inside the beltway. Dysfunctional senators and congressional reps have willfully failed to do their job for years, were responsible for the medical compounding fiasco and related deaths, responsible for the medicare financial crisis, on and on and on. And they think they can be the ones telling others how to do their jobs? Give us a break. Once a Washington Beltway bureaucrat, always one. Looking for more camera time, what is in it for them.
on June 5,2013 | 09:05AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
Wait

Political Radar
Second request

Political Radar
Tipped

Warrior Beat
One last fling

Political Radar
Phased in

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa