Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 17, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Chrysler caves, agrees to recall of Jeeps at risk of fire

By Dee-Ann Durbin & Tom Krisher

AP Auto Writers

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 10:09 a.m. HST, Jun 18, 2013


DETROIT » Chrysler abruptly agreed to recall 2.7 million older model Jeeps today, reversing a defiant posture and avoiding a possible public relations nightmare over fuel tanks that can catch fire in a rear-end collision.

In deciding on the recall, Chrysler avoided a showdown with government safety regulators that could have led to public hearings with witnesses giving details of deadly crashes involving the Jeeps. The dispute ultimately could have landed in court and hurt both Chrysler's image and its finances.

Earlier this month, the company refused the government's request to recall Jeep Grand Cherokees from model years 1993 through 2004 and Jeep Libertys from 2002 through 2007. The company said calls from concerned customers played a part in its reversing course.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the agency that monitors vehicle safety, contends that the Jeep's gas tank can rupture if hit from the rear, causing a fire. NHTSA said a three-year investigation showed that 51 people had died in fiery crashes in Jeeps with gas tanks positioned behind the rear axle.

Two weeks ago, Chrysler said that the vehicles aren't defective, despite prior statements to the contrary from NHTSA. The company vouched for the vehicles safety again today.

Chrysler said that dealers will inspect the vehicles and install trailer hitches to protect the gas tanks. The company said vehicles without hitches will get them, as will those with broken hitches or hitches that aren't from Chrysler.

Chrysler wouldn't say how much the trailer hitches would cost.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(2)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
cojef wrote:
Recall would hurt the bottom line in the short term, but the adverse publicity has long term consequences. Executives bonuses are based on profits thus the reluctance and opposition to the recall. Boards are charged with the responsibility of protecting the long term interests of stockholders, and adverse publicity certainly will hurt Chrysler's image. Better judgement prevailed.
on June 18,2013 | 10:50AM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
Too Late ... damage done. Sales will plummet and they have no one to blame but themselves.
on June 18,2013 | 11:20AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News