Quantcast

Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Feds say US Airways, American merger will raise fares

By Pete Yost

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 12:12 p.m. HST, Aug 13, 2013


WASHINGTON » American Airlines and US Airways expected to spend this week cruising toward completion of their huge merger, a deal that was worth $14 billion on paper and would create the world's biggest airline.

Instead, they were stunned today when the federal government and six states sued to block the deal, saying it would hurt competition and cost consumers hundreds of millions of dollars a year in higher fares and extra fees.

Antitrust regulators had done little to interfere with three other big airline mergers in the past five years, so they were not expected to stand in the way of American and US Airways. But this latest deal would leave four airlines controlling more than 80 percent of the U.S. air-travel market.

The Justice Department turned the words of US Airways leaders against them. The 56-page lawsuit filed in federal district court in Washington, D.C., was peppered with quotes from internal emails, investor presentations and public comments in which the airlines' top executives noted that previous mergers had helped lead to higher fares and higher fees to check a bag or change a ticket.

Executives of the two companies vowed to challenge the lawsuit.

"We will fight them," declared US Airways CEO Doug Parker, who would run the combined company.

Paul Denis, a Washington antitrust lawyer hired by US Airways, said Tuesday was the Justice Department's "best day."

"They got to hold their press conference. Now they've got to try their case in court," he said.

Tom Horton, CEO of American Airlines parent AMR Corp., noted that the companies had spent months trying to convince the Justice Department that the merger would help customers and boost competition by creating a tough new rival to larger airlines United and Delta.

"Since the DOJ has formed a contrary view, the matter will now be settled by the courts," Horton said.

AMR has been operating under bankruptcy protection since November 2011. It has cut labor costs, renegotiated aircraft and other leases and earned $220 million profit in the second quarter — its first profit in the April-to-June period in six years. It is forging ahead with an order for hundreds of new airplanes.

The company had expected that the highlight of this week would be a Thursday hearing in which a federal bankruptcy court judge would approve its reorganization plan, including the merger. That would be one of the final steps before AMR could exit Chapter 11 protection by the end of September.

The hearing is likely to go ahead, and the judge could approve AMR's turnaround plan on the condition that the Justice Department's opposition is resolved. But AMR probably won't come out of bankruptcy for at least a few more months while it fights the lawsuit, officials at the companies said.

American and US Airways had been so confident of a quick merger that they had already named executives for the combined company, which was to be based at AMR's headquarters in Fort Worth and called American Airlines Group Inc. Executives at Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways have been house-hunting in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

The lawsuit may put some of those real estate deals on hold, however. Daniel McKenzie, an analyst for Buckingham Research Group, said the merger went from a 99-percent probability to around 50 percent.

It's possible that the lawsuit won't ever go to trial. Analysts said the Justice Department could be seeking more time and leverage to squeeze concessions from the companies, such as giving up some of their precious takeoff and landing slots at Reagan National Airport, which would create room for new competitors at the busy airport across the Potomac River from Washington.

At a news conference, Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer said the Justice Department was always prepared to discuss a settlement but that it preferred this time to seek an injunction to block the deal.

"As we look at the market today, it's not functioning as competitively as it ought to be," Baer said, and "if this deal goes through, it's going to be much worse."

The Justice Department, which was joined in the lawsuit by the attorneys general of six states and the District of Columbia, said the merger would cause "substantial harm" to consumers by leading to higher fares and fees.

Government lawyers cited examples in which US Airways operates one-stop flights that undercut nonstop flights by American and other rivals by hundreds of dollars. After the merger, they said, US Airways would drop that practice, pushing fares higher.

The lawsuit caught many observers by surprise. In the last five years, antitrust regulators had allowed Delta Air Lines to buy Northwest, United Airlines to combine with Continental, and Southwest Airlines to buy AirTran. The nation had gone from nine major carriers in 2005 to five, and the Justice Department hadn't opposed an airline merger since United's 2001 attempt to buy US Airways, a deal that was later abandoned.

"They didn't have any problem with the Northwest-Delta merger, didn't have any problem with United-Continental. Where did they think it was going to go?" said Robert Mann, an airline consultant who once worked at American.

Consumer advocates cheered the lawsuit.

"This is the best news that consumers could have possibly gotten," said Charlie Leocha, director of the Consumer Travel Alliance and member of a panel that advises the government on travel-consumer issues.

Last year, business and leisure travelers spent more than $70 billion on airfare in the United States.

Shares of both companies plunged on news of the lawsuit. US Airways shares fell $2.24, or 11.9 percent, to $16.58 in afternoon trading. AMR shares were taken off the New York Stock Exchange shortly after the company filed for bankruptcy protection but still trade over the counter. They were down $2.68, or 46.1 percent, to $3.13.

AMR and US Airways announced in February that they planned to merge into a carrier with 6,700 daily flights and annual revenue of roughly $40 billion. By passenger traffic, it would slightly eclipse United Airlines and Delta Air Lines, but all three would be similar in size.

___

AP Airlines Writers Scott Mayerowitz in New York and Joshua Freed in Minneapolis contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(2)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Surfer_Dude wrote:
Too little, too late justice department. Where were you during the Delta/Northwest and United/continental mergers? Less seats, baggage fees, change fees and route reduction all came as a result of those mergers. Blocking the AA/US merger does nothing. The damage is already done to the consumer.
on August 13,2013 | 08:42AM
lee1957 wrote:
I rode US Airways and I wouldn't worry about the lack of competition that may derive from a merger. Their service was so bad I don't think they have any competitors. Then again, a three leg trip to DC on American yielded three bags of peanuts, one for each leg.
on August 13,2013 | 05:16PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs