Quantcast
  

Saturday, April 19, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Feds won't sue to stop marijuana use in 2 states

By Gene Johnson & Pete Yost

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 11:27 a.m. HST, Aug 29, 2013


WASHINGTON » Despite 75 years of federal marijuana prohibition, the Justice Department said today that states can let people use the drug, license people to grow it and even allow adults to stroll into stores and buy it — as long as the weed is kept away from kids, the black market and federal property.

In a sweeping new policy statement prompted by pot legalization votes in Washington and Colorado last fall, the department gave the green light to states to adopt tight regulatory schemes to oversee the medical and recreational marijuana industries burgeoning across the country.

The action, welcomed by supporters of legalization, could set the stage for more states to legalize marijuana. Alaska is scheduled to vote on the question next year, and a few other states plan similar votes in 2016.

The policy change embraces what Justice Department officials called a "trust but verify" approach between the federal government and states that enact recreational drug use.

In a memo to all 94 U.S. attorneys' offices around the country, Deputy Attorney General James Cole said the federal government expects that states and local governments authorizing "marijuana-related conduct" will implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that address the threat those state laws could pose to public health and safety.

"If state enforcement efforts are not sufficiently robust ... the federal government may seek to challenge the regulatory structure itself," the memo stated.

The U.S. attorney in Colorado, John Walsh, said he will continue to focus on whether Colorado's system has the resources and tools necessary to protect key federal public safety interests.

Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper said the state is working to improve education and prevention efforts directed at young people and on enforcement tools to prevent access to marijuana by those under age 21. Colorado also is determined to keep marijuana businesses from being fronts for criminal enterprises or other illegal activity, he said, and the state is committed to preventing the export of marijuana while also enhancing efforts to keep state roads safe from impaired drivers.

Under the policy, the federal government's top investigative priorities range from preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors to preventing sales revenue from going to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels and preventing the diversion of marijuana outside of states where it is legal under state law.

Other top-priority enforcement areas include stopping state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover for trafficking other illegal drugs and preventing violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana. The top areas also include preventing drugged driving, preventing growing marijuana on public land and preventing marijuana possession on federal property.

The Justice Department memo says it will take a broad view of the federal priorities. For example, in preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors, enforcement could take place whenmarijuana trafficking takes place near an area associated with minors, or when marijuana is marketed in a manner appealing to minors or diverted to minors.

Following the votes in Colorado and Washington last year, Attorney General Eric Holder launched a review of marijuana enforcement policy that included an examination of the two states. The issue was whether they should be blocked from operating marijuana markets on the grounds that actively regulating an illegal substance conflicts with federal drug law that bans it.

Last December, President Barack Obama said it doesn't make sense for the federal government to go after recreational drug users in a state that has legalized it. Last week, the White House said that prosecution of drug traffickers remains an important priority.

A Pew Research Center poll in March found that 60 percent of Americans think the federal government shouldn't enforce federal anti-marijuana laws in states where its use has been approved. Younger people, who tend to vote more Democratic, are especially prone to that view. But opponents are worried these moves will lead to more use by young people. Colorado and Washington were states that helped re-elect Obama.

"Today's announcement demonstrates the sort of political vision and foresight from the White House we've been seeking for a long time," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, a New York-based group. "The White House is basically saying to Washington and Colorado: Proceed with caution."

Dan Riffle of the Marijuana Policy Project, the nation's largest marijuana policy organization, called the policy change "a major and historic step toward ending marijuana prohibition" and "a clear signal that states are free to determine their own policies."

Kevin Sabet, the director of Project Smart Approaches to Marijuana, an anti-legalization group, predicted the new Justice Department policy will accelerate a national discussion about legalization because people will see its harms — including more drugged driving and higher high school dropout rates.

Johnson reported from Seattle. Associated Press writer Kristen Wyatt in Denver contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(5)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Mythman wrote:
This story has a lot in it that is about Hawaii. Hawaii has never done anything to regulate pot to prevent it from being a criminal enterprise, etc even though it is illegal in state law. Now what is going to happen. The state never really regulates anything unless it is something someone who is not an insider is doing that prisses off an insider, then they use their buddies in local govt to shut them down using law. Get ready for pot use increasing in kids from the age of ten and up and the gradual destruction of the next generation through becoming pot heads. What a world. Why don't we just turn over the keys to the country to China, Mexico and Russia and move en masse to, where? Australia?
on August 29,2013 | 12:20PM
GONEGOLFIN wrote:
Too many myths you have just let loose.
on August 29,2013 | 01:19PM
Anonymous wrote:
wonder if the fed's leader was user at punahou...
on August 29,2013 | 04:37PM
BigIsandLava wrote:
Education is very much a part of legalization. Granted, maybe a higher percentage of marijuana use will happen, but I believe at the same time there will be less alcohol consumption. Which equates to less traffic deaths, violent incidences and other alcohol-related health problems to name a few. I believe a lot of the states that legalized marijuana was not only for the purpose of recreational use, but economics and tax generation are other driving reasons. Not incarcerating marijuana users at states' expenses, especially since they are imprisoned for non-violent crimes. Also eliminating the black market and corner drug houses where exposure to higher classified drugs are readily available. It would be interesting to have studies on the correlation between increased marijuana use and it's impacts on alcohol and cigarette usage. I have some friends that felt smoking marijuana helped them to stop smoking cigarettes. Those concerned about underage marijuana consumption are valid, but with the high percentage of underage drinking and traffic related deaths; what are we doing about it?
on August 29,2013 | 01:19PM
BigIsandLava wrote:
Oh Yeah the insurance companies are banking on young people, but not reducing alcohol related deaths.
on August 29,2013 | 01:20PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News