Sunday, July 27, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

High-roller challenging Nevada casino markers law

By Ken Ritter

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 08:58 a.m. HST, Sep 14, 2013

LAS VEGAS » A California ice cream mogul who was convicted of four felonies for failure to pay $384,000 in casino IOUs is challenging a Nevada state law that lets Las Vegas Strip resorts turn to county prosecutors to collect unpaid gambling debts.

The Nevada Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in Reno on a rare constitutional challenge of a 1995 state law that serves as a model for other U.S. states with casino businesses.

Nevada treats written IOUs, known as casino markers, like fraudulent bad checks. It also lets prosecutors tack on a 10 percent processing and prosecution fee with any settlement. In Las Vegas, that amounted to about $2.78 million in the 2012-13 fiscal year.

"The thrust of the case is whether when a casino gives people 30, 60 or 90 days to repay, it's really a loan or a check," said Bernie Zadrowski, the chief deputy Clark County district attorney who prosecuted thousands of cases during a seven-year stint heading the bad check unit. He argued the case Tuesday before the seven Supreme Court justices.

"Does the casino have some kind of duty to determine whether the defendant has enough money in their bank account when they write a marker?" Zadrowski said in an interview. "That goes to whether it's a check or a loan."

Disputes over loans are handled in civil courts, Zadrowski noted. Bad checks can be prosecuted criminally.

Clark County prosecutors handled about 6,300 bad check cases last year, said Christopher Lalli, assistant Clark County district attorney. Many stemmed from purchases at mom-and-pop stores and big retailers like Wal-Mart, Kmart and Family Dollar. Most defendants settle their case before trial, and waive their ability to appeal.

A few cases involve high-rollers like Harel Zahavi, the Israel-born ice cream businessman who now lives in Rancho Cucamonga, Calif., and no longer gambles, said his attorney, His attorney, Matthew Lay.

"They took and took and took from him, and he ends up convicted of four felonies," Lay said. "That's life-altering."

Zahavi is one of very few who bet their fate on the findings of a Las Vegas jury.

The largest case since the state Legislature added "credit extended by any licensed gaming establishment" to state bad check law in 1995 involved the 2009 indictment of Terrance "Terry" Watanabe.

Watanabe, the wealthy former owner of the Omaha, Neb.-based Oriental Trading Co., was indicted on allegations he failed to pay $14.75 million in casino debts. He countered with a civil lawsuit against Harrah's Entertainment Inc., before both sides reached a confidential settlement in July 2010.

Other headline-grabbing casino bad check cases include a $2.5 million bad check dispute between "Girls Gone Wild" founder Joe Francis and casinos owned by Las Vegas casino magnate Steve Wynn, and the conviction in 2011 of former NBA All-Star Antoine Walker. Walker pleaded guilty before trial, was sentenced to five years' probation and ordered to pay about $770,000 in restitution.

Zahavi lost his trial in 2010, and was convicted of four felony charges of drawing and passing a check without sufficient funds with intent to defraud. He was spared prison time, but was sentenced to five years of probation, banned from casinos and ordered to pay $379,000 in restitution.

Now, Zahavi wants the state high court to overturn his conviction.

He argues that casino markers are short-term business loans, not personal checks, because casinos routinely hold them for several months before redeeming them.

Lay told justices during arguments Tuesday at Reno High School that Zahavi had no intent to defraud the casinos.

Casino executives had all the advantages, Lay said in an interview, including credit checks and access to information about Zahavi's finances. They also knew about Zahavi's his increasingly wobbly ability to pay after he lost his ice cream business in a distribution dispute in 2004, he said.

Zahavi, a longtime loyal casino customer who played baccarat, struggled to pay $700,000 in casino debts in 2008. Just weeks later, the Venetian and Palazzo, the Hard Rock and Caesars Palace extended him the hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of credit that led to the criminal charges and his conviction, according to court documents.

The Supreme Court didn't make an immediate ruling. A decision is expected to take several months.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
livinginhawaii wrote:
"They took and took from him"? More like he gave and gave. The guy needs to assume personal responsibility and accountability for his "giving".
on September 14,2013 | 11:00AM
Mypualani wrote:
Exactly correct ! These days personal responsibility is not something I see happening.
on September 14,2013 | 11:30AM
It happens every day. I think you may be only looking for what is not happening instead of looking for when it is. I guarantee you there are more cases of it happening than not. For the most part-people are good and ethical in their day to day lives.
on September 14,2013 | 11:52AM
cojef wrote:
Hi-rollers gets perks and when it comes time to pay, renege. I visit Vegas only to meet my classmates from Kauai. Never liked gambling and thus have no regrets about losing anything.
on September 14,2013 | 11:54AM
HD36 wrote:
Debtor prisons went away along time ago. The distinction between a loan and a bad check depends on the repayment. Loans are usually paid back over time with payments. Checks are usually paid in full when cashed. I guess the penalty differs because if you default on a loan, the burden is on the creditor to make sure you can pay it back, and will charge you an interest rate and terms relative to the risk. With a check, the maker is gauranteeing that its good and he has the funds. The key to criminal intent was wether or not the maker knew or should have known the funds are available to cover the check. The Jew is probably going to lose as the Nevada courts construe the ambiguities in favor of the life blood of Nevada.
on September 14,2013 | 12:34PM
tiki886 wrote:
The "Jew" must have the money since he could have declared bankruptcy to escape payment.
on September 14,2013 | 06:41PM
HD36 wrote:
Not if it's a criminal charge like child support payments, back taxes, and writing bad checks.
on September 14,2013 | 08:37PM
brusselsprouts wrote:
who cares.
on September 14,2013 | 02:15PM
Anonymous wrote:
The Casino's did not force Mr. Zahavi to play at their Baccarrat tables, nobody forced him to play, or borrow funds to continue playing when his luck turned sour! He is a grown adult and business man and should have known when to walk away; he was held accountable for his transactions and transgressions with the Casino's, when he could not pay back the funds he gambled away in a Nevada court of law! He should not be given a second bite at the legal apple; as a convicted felon, he has no legal standing in filing this court challenge against the Las Vegas Casino's and how they handle Casino marker transactions in their establishments!
on September 14,2013 | 05:01PM
hikine wrote:
I agree. He knew he didn't have the funds to cover his gambling debts yet he continued to play and lose. He's the one defrauding the casinos by not paying his debts. If it was old Vegas he would've had cement shoes!
on September 14,2013 | 07:37PM
tiki886 wrote:
And some of the m o r o n s here in Hawaii want to bring legalized gambling to our shores?
on September 14,2013 | 06:39PM
HD36 wrote:
We already have legalized gambling although its more fixed: stock market and house flippers.
on September 14,2013 | 08:39PM
Breaking News
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War