Thursday, July 31, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 22 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

General in charge of U.S. nuclear missiles fired

By Robert Burns

AP National Security Writer

LAST UPDATED: 12:37 p.m. HST, Oct 11, 2013

WASHINGTON » The Air Force fired the general in charge of its nuclear missiles today, just two days after a Navy admiral with top nuclear weapons responsibilities was sacked. Both men are caught up in investigations of alleged personal misconduct, adding to a cascade of turmoil inside the nation's nuclear weapons force.

The Air Force removed Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, a 35-year veteran, from his command of 20th Air Force, responsible for all 450 of the service's intercontinental ballistic missiles. Carey, who took his post in Wyoming in June 2012, will be reassigned pending the outcome of an investigation into personal misbehavior, the service said.

The Air Force would not specify what Carey is alleged to have done wrong, but two officials with knowledge of the investigation indicated that it was linked to alcohol use.

They said it was not related to the performance or combat readiness of ICBM units or to his stewardship of the force.

Removing senior officers in the nuclear force is rare but has happened twice this week.

On Wednesday the Navy said Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, the second-in-charge at U.S. Strategic Command, was fired amid an investigation of gambling issues. He was demoted from three- to two-star rank and reassigned to a Navy staff job until the investigation is completed.

Together, the Carey and Giardina firings add a new dimension to a set of serious problems facing the military's nuclear force. The ICBM segment in particular has had several recent setbacks, including a failed safety and security inspection at a base in Montana in August, followed by the firing of the colonel there in charge of security forces. In May, The Associated Press revealed that 17 Minuteman 3 missile launch control officers at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., had been taken off duty in a reflection of what one officer there called "rot" inside the ICBM force.

Air Force Gen. Robert Kehler, the nation's most senior nuclear commander as head of U.S. Strategic Command, called the Carey and Giardina matters "unfortunate behavioral incidents," but he would not discuss details.

In a telephone interview from his headquarters near Omaha, Neb., Kehler said he told Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, on Thursday that the two cases had not shaken his confidence in the force.

"I still have 100 percent confidence that the nation's nuclear deterrent force is safe, secure and effective." He added that "this is something that has been on their minds as well," referring to Hagel and Dempsey.

"You are going to have to make your own judgment when all the facts come out on these two particular cases, but I can say this: In these cases, this ultimately had to do with a loss of confidence" in Carey and Giardina "as a result of certain behavior."

Other problems have surfaced this year. In a March inspection, launch crews at Minot scored the equivalent of a "D'' grade on missile operations. In June the Minot officer in charge of training and proficiency of missile crews was fired.

Throughout this period the Air Force and top Pentagon officials have insisted that the nuclear force is safe and secure. But the competence of its management has been questioned.

Documents obtained by the AP show that at lower levels the force is beset with morale problems and incidents of indiscipline.

The U.S. has been shrinking the size of its nuclear arsenal for many years; it is comprised of long-range missiles aboard submarines, long-range bombers and ICBMs. As of Oct. 1 the U.S. had 1,688 deployed strategic nuclear warheads, which Washington is obliged to reduce to 1,550 by 2018 under the New START treaty with Russia.

As the arsenal has grown smaller, questions about management of the force have loomed larger. Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon, the Republican chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said in August that the Air Force must refocus on its nuclear mission. He urged it to "hold failed leadership" accountable and to "recommit itself from the top down" to the mission of safely operating nuclear weapons.

The decision to sack Carey was made by Lt. Gen. James Kowalski, commander of Air Force Global Strike Command, which is in charge of all Air Force nuclear weapons, including bombers. The case appears to be unrelated to that of Giardina, but the two men are associated in the chain of responsibility for U.S. nuclear weapons.

Carey did not report directly to Giardina, but the ICBMs under Carey's command would, in the event of war, receive their launch commands through Strategic Command, where Giardina had been the deputy commander since December 2011. By coincidence, Kowalski, who fired Carey, has been nominated to succeed Giardina at Strategic Command. The Senate has not yet confirmed Kowalski.

Kowalski selected the vice commander of Air Force Global Strike Command, Maj. Gen. Jack Weinstein, to temporarily replace Carey.

"It's unfortunate that I've had to relieve an officer who's had an otherwise distinctive career spanning 35 years of commendable service," Kowalski said in a written statement from his headquarters at Barksdale Air Force Base, La.

An internal email obtained by the AP today said the allegations against Carey stem from an inspector general probe of his behavior while on an unspecified "temporary duty assignment." The email said the allegations are not related to the operational readiness of the ICBM force or recent failed inspections of ICBM units.

At a Pentagon news conference, an Air Force spokesman, Brig. Gen. Les Kodlick, would not provide details about the alleged misbehavior by Carey except to say it does not involve sexual misconduct or criminal activity. He said the investigation had been underway for several months.

"There was misbehavior such that (Kowalski) decided that it didn't exemplify the trust and responsibilities required of a commander who is responsible for the nuclear force," Kodlick said.

"Especially in the nuclear enterprise, it's a position of great trust and responsibility. The nuclear deterrence mission is one of great focus, discipline. Personal behavior is vital to that, especially from a commander."

Separately, two senior defense officials with knowledge of the allegations told the AP that they are at least partly related to alcohol use. The officials spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were was not authorized to discuss an internal investigation that is not yet finished.

Carey began his Air Force career in the enlisted ranks in 1978. He was commissioned as an officer in 1983 and is a veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He took command of the ICBM force, at 20th Air Force headquarters at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo., in June 2012.

Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 22 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
kgolfinghawaii wrote:
I'll bet he doesn't like Obama and told someone that is kissing Obama's rear end.
on October 11,2013 | 06:10AM
1local wrote:
Is the USA following Syria's and Egypt's example?
on October 11,2013 | 07:44AM
TMJ wrote:
Comrade Obama is cleaning house with the upper military brass. Why?
on October 11,2013 | 06:31AM
ya_think wrote:
First thing I thought of on the last one he had fired!
on October 11,2013 | 09:20AM
allie wrote:
scary to have people like this in charge of all our nukes
on October 11,2013 | 10:18AM
ejkorvette wrote:
Once again, the mindless and clueless comments strike again.
on October 11,2013 | 06:53AM
ya_think wrote:
Not mindless or clueless, just mistrustful of this White House and his entire Administration.
on October 11,2013 | 09:21AM
Keith_Rollman wrote:
Does this headline mean the General lost his job or is about to launch all his nuclear missiles?
on October 11,2013 | 07:02AM
livinginhawaii wrote:
Loss of trust and confidence - sounds like the film Dr. Strangelove..
on October 11,2013 | 07:44AM
PokeStop wrote:
Put them in an open field and fire aerial mortars at them. That's what Obama's counterpart in N. Korea does with his disgraced military commanders.
on October 11,2013 | 08:46AM
DABLACK wrote:
Need to wait til ALL the facts are presented.
on October 11,2013 | 08:50AM
iwanaknow wrote:
This is sad................did booze do him in? or was he thrown under the bus for the greater good? I bet our enemies would love to buy his secrets? If he had "retired" would he have kept his pension?
on October 11,2013 | 09:06AM
fiveo wrote:
We may never know the real reason this general is being canned. Maybe it is some kind of "cleaning house" so someone more amenable can be put in position. This gambling thing sounds like a bunch of bravo/sierra.
on October 11,2013 | 09:27AM
HAJAA1 wrote:
SA journalists are a sorry bunch. Or is it the editors? I mean, really, you guys need serious work on your headlines.
on October 11,2013 | 09:57AM
UhhDuhh wrote:
For real. Was thinking next article would be the Russians or Chinese respond by firing missiles back. Dumb.
on October 11,2013 | 10:09AM
retire wrote:
They are pretty good at censorship though, most of my comments are dumped for stating the facts.
on October 11,2013 | 11:37AM
HAJAA1 wrote:
Agree 110% on that!
on October 11,2013 | 11:57AM
false wrote:
If all misconduct during TDY's/TAD's were actually investigated, I'd say a lot of military or civilian personnel would be demoted or reprimanded. I say this with over 35 years with the Defense Department. The phrase, "They'll never know back home" seems to ring true.
on October 11,2013 | 10:12AM
retire wrote:
Sadly, if most of these people working in or for the military weren't employed by same, they would still be living in their parent's basements.
on October 11,2013 | 02:18PM
cojef wrote:
Very sad story of warrior who gave 35 years of his life to the Nation, only to be formally be disgraced for some shortcomings which were not spelled out. Of course, the assignment he held required the utmost of integrity and any shortcoming are not permissable. Caught between a rock and hard spot for one could not turn down such an important assignment even if one wanted too. Retirement is his only recourse.
on October 11,2013 | 11:20AM
retire wrote:
While the knee jerk reaction to most comments regarding the military tends to be "support the troops", the problem lies in the caliber and basic lack of maturity and character in the current generations serving in the military. It's purpose has become aberatted, now we are more concerned with gay marriage rights and constant external validation than winning wars. It has become a giant "parents basement' where people cease to be put their responsibilites on the front burner.
on October 11,2013 | 11:21AM
KonaWarrior wrote:
What concerns me is that a guy like this with all of his knowledge of the US Nuclear program and whatever intelligence information that he has, could he become a prime target by the Chinese to pick his brains by offering a lot of cash especially now that he is a disgruntled former military officer?
on October 11,2013 | 11:40AM
Breaking News
The Green Leaf
Marine debris art

Political Radar
`Toss up’

Political Radar

Political Radar
Hilton; Plaza Club

Political Radar
Direct mail

Political Radar
Direct mail