Quantcast

Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Concerns raised about security of health website

By Laurie Kellman & Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 09:25 a.m. HST, Oct 30, 2013


WASHINGTON » Defending President Barack Obama's much-maligned health care overhaul in Congress, his top health official was confronted today with a government memo raising new security concerns about the trouble-prone website that consumers are using to enroll.

The document, obtained by The Associated Press, shows that administration officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were concerned that a lack of testing posed a potentially "high" security risk for the HealthCare.gov website serving 36 states. It was granted a temporary security certificate so it could operate.

Security issues are a new concern for the troubled HealthCare.gov website. If they cannot be resolved, they could prove to be more serious than the long list of technical problems the administration is trying to address.

"You accepted a risk on behalf of every user...that put their personal financial information at risk," Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., told Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius during questioning before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. "Amazon would never do this. ProFlowers would never do this. Kayak would never do this. This is completely an unacceptable level of security."

Sebelius countered that the system is secure, even though the site has a temporary certificate, known in government parlance as an "authority to operate." Sebelius said a permanent certificate will only be issued once all security issues are addressed.

Added spokeswoman Joanne Peters: "When consumers fill out their online...applications, they can trust that the information they're providing is protected by stringent security standards and that the technology underlying the application process has been tested and is secure. Security testing happens on an ongoing basis using industry best practices."

A security certificate is required before any government computer system can process, store or transmit agency data. Temporary certificates are allowable, but under specific circumstances.

Earlier, the secretary said she's responsible for the "debacle" of cascading problems that overwhelmed the government website intended to make shopping for health insurance clear and simple.

"Hold me accountable for the debacle," Sebelius said during a contentious hearing. "I'm responsible."

Sebelius is promising to have the problems fixed by Nov. 30, even as Republicans opposed to Obama's health care law are calling in chorus for her resignation. She told the committee that the technical issues that led to frozen screens and error messages are being cleared up on a daily basis.

Addressing consumers, Sebelius added, "So let me say directly to these Americans, you deserve better. I apologize."

The Sept. 27 memo to Medicare chief Marylin Tavenner said a website contractor wasn't able to test all the security controls in one complete version of the system.

"From a security perspective, the aspects of the system that were not tested due to the ongoing development, exposed a level of uncertainty that can be deemed as a high risk for the (website)," the memo said.

It recommended setting up a security team to address risks, conduct daily tests, and a full security test within two to three months of going live.

HealthCare.gov was intended to be the online gateway to coverage for millions of uninsured Americans, as well those who purchase their policies individually. Many people in the latter group will have to get new insurance next year, because their policies do not meet the standards of the new law.

Sebelius' forthright statement about her ultimate accountability came as she was being peppered with questions by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., about who was responsible. It was Blackburn who introduced the term "debacle."

Rep. Henry Waxman of California, the ranking Democrat on the committee, scoffed at Republican "oversight" of a law they have repeatedly tried to repeal.

"I would urge my colleagues to stop hyperventilating," said Waxman. "The problems with HealthCare.gov are unfortunate and we should investigate them, but they will be fixed. And then every American will have — finally have access to affordable health insurance."

Throughout the 3-hour hearing, Sebelius was respectful and poised, often addressing lawmakers as "sir" or "congresswoman." She kept her cool as some lawmakers repeatedly cut off her answers. But she did not shy a few times from tersely interjecting her views while a member was speaking.

The standing-room-only hearing room was silent when she swore an oath to tell the truth and began her statement. "I apologize," she told the rapt committee.

Sebelius faced questions about problems with the website as well as a wave of cancellation notices hitting individuals and small businesses who buy their own insurance.

Lawmakers also want to know how many people have enrolled in plans through the health exchanges, a number the Obama administration has so far refused to divulge, instead promising to release it in mid-November.

On Tuesday, Medicare chief Marilyn Tavenner was questioned for nearly three hours by members of the House Ways and Means Committee who wanted to know why so many of their constituents were getting cancellation notices from their insurance companies.

The cancellations problem goes to one of Obama's earliest promises about the health law: You can keep your plan if you like it. The promise dates back to June 2009, when Congress was starting to grapple with overhauling the health care system to cover uninsured Americans.

As early as last spring, state insurance commissioners started giving insurers the option of canceling existing individual plans for 2014, because the coverage required under Obama's law is significantly more robust. Some states directed insurers to issue cancellations. Large employer plans covering most workers and their families are unlikely to be affected.

The law includes a complicated "grandfathering" system to try to make good on Obama's pledge. It shields plans from the law's requirements provided the plans themselves change very little. Insurers say it has proven impractical. The cancellation notices are now reaching policyholders.

Tavenner blamed insurance companies for cancelling the policies and said most people who lose coverage will be able to find better replacement plans in the health insurance exchanges, in some cases for less money.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(7)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
serious wrote:
So, a no bid contract to a Canadian company whose chief executive is a black female, and the company gave $47M to the Obama campaign. She was a classmate of Michelle's also!!!
on October 30,2013 | 07:06AM
thepartyfirst wrote:
The problem is that they who voted for this Administration are not holding them accountable. Meaning they the voters are just as accountable. So, then, it is the voters who are not qualified to vote and to be accountable.
on October 30,2013 | 07:20AM
JAFO wrote:
A Princeton classmate. Isn't cronyism and quid pro quo not allowed in government service?
on October 30,2013 | 07:53AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
But...but...but it stimulates the Canada economy to pump several hundred million dollars to their businesses.
on October 30,2013 | 08:07AM
50skane wrote:
I guess somebody had to take the heat off Obama and take the rap for his mess!
on October 30,2013 | 07:59AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
It annoys me that high paid government officials keep saying that they "are as upset and frustrated as you" when talking about the goat rope that is Obamacare.

No, you are NOT as frustrated as someone who has few resources and needs coverage and time is ticking and they believed your lies and incompetence.


on October 30,2013 | 08:06AM
cojef wrote:
It's so eay to say I'm responsible and then laugh off. It is almost impossible to fire a Federal employee. The Republicans tried to get an IRS official to testify and she pleaded the 5th. Nothing happened and she even got promoted. Think she was eligible for retiremnent and if my memory is intact she finally retired. The Republicans are trying their darndness for Secretary Sebelius to resign, but she is tough ex-politician/Governor and she just admitted that boondoggle was her faulr and will merrily go on her way. Republican should not fight their losing cause. If the market place is not ready for universal health care it will die on its on weight. If it succeeds its good for the Country.
on October 30,2013 | 08:41AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs