Quantcast

Monday, July 21, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Jury orders Samsung to pay Apple $290 million

By Paul Elias

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 05:30 p.m. HST, Nov 21, 2013


SAN JOSE, Calif. >> A Silicon Valley jury today added $290 million more to the damages Samsung Electronics owes Apple for copying vital iPhone and iPad features, bringing the total amount the South Korean technology titan is on the hook for to $930 million.

The verdict covers 13 older Samsung devices that a previous jury found were among 26 Samsung products that infringed Apple patents.

The previous jury awarded Apple $1.05 billion. But U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh reduced the damages to $640 million after ruling that jury miscalculated the amount owed on 13 devices and ordered a new trial.

Apple had asked for $380 million, arguing Samsung's copying cost it a significant amount of sales. Samsung countered that it owed only $52 million because the features at issue weren't the reasons most consumers chose to buy Samsung's devices instead of Apple's.

Samsung said it would appeal both verdicts.

"For Apple, this case has always been about more than patents and money," Apple spokeswoman Kristin Huguet said. "While it's impossible to put a price tag on those values, we are grateful to the jury for showing Samsung that copying has a cost."

A third trial is scheduled for March to consider Apple's claims that Samsung's newest devices such as the popular Galaxy S III on the market also copied Apple's technology.

Apple and Samsung are the world's two biggest smartphone makers. The bitter rivals have been waging a global battle for supremacy of the $300 billion worldwide market. The size of the award didn't faze Wall Street or harm or help either company's financial fortunes in any significant way.

Samsung reported it had $47 billion in cash at the end of September and racked up $247.5 billion in revenue last year. Apple has $147 billion of cash on hand and took in $170.9 billion in revenue last year.

"We understood that the money wasn't really an issue," said juror Barry Goldman-Hall. "This was about the integrity of the patent process."

Goldman-Hall, 60, of San Jose was one of two men and six women on the jury, which was tasked only with determining damages.

Apple has argued in courts, government tribunals and regulatory agencies around the world that Samsung's Android-based phones copy vital iPhone features. Samsung is fighting back with its own complaints that some key Apple patents are invalid and Apple has copied Samsung's technology.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(8)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Bully wrote:
Not bad 1 billion to 290 million, I think they need to use an accounting firm to arrive at the correct figure.
on November 21,2013 | 09:51AM
RichardCory wrote:
Oh, good thinking. Maybe you should call Apple and tell them that. I'm sure their team of highly-paid lawyers hadn't thought of that.
on November 21,2013 | 10:00AM
jtamura69 wrote:
It's shows that Samsung is at fault. For every appeal that they loose it should go up 500 million until Samsung gets the point that they are the law breakers in this case.
on November 21,2013 | 09:58AM
kiragirl wrote:
Foreign countries do not know about copyrights. Just check the label on everything and it says MADE IN a foreign country.
on November 21,2013 | 11:07AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Glad to hear because Apple really needs some cash.
on November 21,2013 | 10:10AM
Fred01 wrote:
Apple is total garbage.
on November 21,2013 | 10:24AM
juscasting wrote:
Fuji Apples with lihing powder rock!
on November 21,2013 | 10:36AM
buggee808 wrote:
The ones that are making out on all of this are the attorneys for both sides. Ka Ching!
on November 21,2013 | 10:50AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs