Monday, April 21, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 15 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

As city cycling grows, so does bike tax temptation

By Jason Keyser

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 08:12 a.m. HST, Dec 26, 2013

CHICAGO » Early blasts of snow, ice and below-zero temperatures haven't stopped a surprising number of Chicago cyclists from spinning through the slush this winter, thanks in part to a city so serious about accommodating them that it deploys mini-snow plows to clear bike lanes.

The snow-clearing operation is just the latest attention city leaders have lavished on cycling, from a growing web of bike lanes to the nation's second largest shared network of grab-and-go bicycles stationed all over town. But it also spotlights questions that have been raised here, a city wrestling with deep financial problems, and across the country.

Who is paying for all this bicycle upkeep? And shouldn't bicyclists be kicking in themselves?

A city councilwoman's recent proposal to institute a $25 annual cycling tax set off a lively debate that eventually sputtered out after the city responded with a collective "Say what?" A number of gruff voices spoke in favor, feeding off motorists' antagonism toward what they deride as stop sign-running freeloaders. Bike-friendly bloggers retorted that maybe pedestrians ought to be charged a shoe tax to use the sidewalks.

"There'd be special bike cops pulling people over? Or cameras? What do you do (to enforce this)?" asked Mike Salvatore, owner of Heritage Bicycles, a new Chicago hangout that neatly blends a lively cafe with a custom bike-building workshop in a 19th-century building.

Chicago is by no means the only place across the U.S. tempted to see bicyclists as a possible new source of revenue, only to run into questions of fairness and enforceability. That is testing the vision of city leaders who are transforming urban expanses with bike lanes and other amenities in a quest for relevance, vitality and livability — with never enough funds.

Two or three states consider legislation each year for some type of cycling registration and tax — complete with decals or mini-license plates, National Conference of State Legislatures policy specialist Douglas Shinkle said. This year, it was Georgia, Oregon, Washington and Vermont. The Oregon legislation, which failed, would even have applied to children.

"I really think that legislators are just trying to be as creative as possible and as open to any sort of possibilities to fill in any funding gaps. Everything is on the table," he said.

It's not a new idea. The Netherlands, where a cycling lifestyle has long been the norm, had bike taxes from 1924 to 1941, when the Nazis did away with it in a gesture meant to win over the Dutch.

Hawaii has had a statewide bike registration law for decades, as has the normally tax-hating city of Colorado Springs, Colo., though in both cases, they are one-time fees and all proceeds go toward bicycle infrastructure.

In the case of Colorado Springs, the proposal came from the cycling community itself. The $4 tax on the purchase of new bikes has been in place since 1988, and no one seems to mind. It only raises up to $150,000 a year, but it's useful as a local match for federal grants. And it gives cycling advocates leverage when pushing for bike projects. For one thing, it has revealed that 25,000 bikes are sold each year, a big number in a city of 430,000.

"The idea was to legitimize bicycles," explained Al Brody, a cycling enthusiast and retired Air Force officer who once coaxed a city councilwoman on a trek up Pikes Peak to lobby for opening up the mountain roadway to bicyclists. "It's in your face: We're paying taxes, this is how many bikes we're selling."

Portland, Ore., is handing over entire traffic lanes to cyclists downtown, irritating some businesses.

Robert Huckaby, who owns a moving company, tried but couldn't raise $1 million to get a measure on Oregon's statewide ballot requiring a bicycle registration fee and licensing. He acted after the city permanently closed a road that was a main entrance for his business because cyclists blowing a stop sign were getting hit by vehicles making turns.

"The unfortunate part is that we want to be known as the bike-friendly city of the United States, but no one's listening to John Public," Huckaby said. "They're just listening to basically the city of Portland and the bicyclists."

In Chicago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel has made bike lanes and bike programs a signature issue, believing it makes downtown an attractive place for bright young people and innovative companies. More bikes means less pollution, less traffic congestion, practically zero wear and tear on the city's roads and a healthier population.

Nevertheless, the idea that cyclists aren't paying their fair share has resonated. But many bike riders are also car owners who pay the fuel tax that helps fund highway construction, or home owners who pay property taxes, which go partly toward road construction.

The city councilwoman didn't do herself any favors by trying to sell her bike tax idea as an alternative to a hike in cable TV taxes; opponents accused her of wanting to subsidize coach potatoes at the expense of healthy cyclists.

Good or bad policy, some bikers feel the debate heralds cycling's re-emergence into the American mainstream.

"Who would have taken (the councilwoman) seriously 10 years ago?" Salvatore, 32, said. "Seriously, 10 years ago, there was (only) a handful of nutcases who biked around Chicago."

 Print   Email   Comment | View 15 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
HonoluluHawaii wrote:
What a tease, I thought this was Honolulu.
on December 26,2013 | 07:47AM
MakaniKai wrote:
I too thought this was about revenue enhancement (TAX) from $$$ Kirky Boy $$$
on December 26,2013 | 11:45AM
HanabataDays wrote:
The Beatles got it right fifty years ago: "If you drive a car, I'll tax the street / If you try to sit, I'll tax your seat / If you get too cold I'll tax the heat / If you take a walk, I'll tax your feet."
on December 26,2013 | 08:03AM
Bdpapa wrote:
We don't need to tax bikes. Just more paperwork, it's not worth the money.
on December 26,2013 | 08:23AM
DAGR81 wrote:
Make it worth the money. These cyclist need to pay the to pay their fair share.
on December 26,2013 | 08:44AM
I disagree, if we are ever to get rid of the cars on the street, we need a means of making the bike-riding look a little more desirable.
on December 26,2013 | 09:02AM
Hugo wrote:
I paid about 20% of the cost of my new bike to register it. My "fair share"? A new $20k car would pay the equivalent of about $4,000.
on December 26,2013 | 12:12PM
RetiredWorking wrote:
Hugo, so $4000 would register your car for its lifetime then, just like your bike, which cost you less than $100?
on December 26,2013 | 01:19PM
mcc wrote:
Nice way for the City to encourage bike riders. Next we will have a beach tax, a walking tax, a breathing tax, etc., etc,
on December 26,2013 | 08:27AM
serious wrote:
Actually, I am amazed that this Democratic state missed something in their tax net. If it breathes or moves, tax it until it dies!! But, one thing they do tax is motorcycles, BUT, they should have one safety check a year and that to check the decibel level!!!
on December 26,2013 | 08:55AM
Serious, have you ever rode a bike (motorcycle) before? If you have, and you have had the "close encounters" with people driving into your lane because, "oh, I did'nt see or HEAR you", then you'd understand the LOUD pipes.
on December 26,2013 | 09:06AM
pj737 wrote:
Maybe if the city actually provided safe bike lanes like other cities do would a tax be fair. Local cyclists are taking cars off the road and putting their lives at risk in the process. They should be rewarded - not taxed.
on December 26,2013 | 08:38AM
atilter wrote:
unfortunately stupidity is not restricted to only one segment of the vehicle choosing population. every vehicle group likes to think that they have the right to be inherently stupid with regard to traffic laws. that small percentage always makes it bad for the larger percent of considerate vehicle users.
on December 26,2013 | 09:19AM
loquaciousone wrote:
I don't need to pay any road maintenance fee. I just ride on the sidewalks.
on December 26,2013 | 12:56PM
RetiredWorking wrote:
lol, so you ride on one continuous sidewalk?
on December 26,2013 | 01:21PM
Breaking News