Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Feds: Police officer’s ghoulish plot no fantasy

By Tom Hays and Larry Neumeister

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:57 a.m. HST, Oct 26, 2012



NEW YORK » It’s a ghoulish tale to rival Hannibal Lecter: A police officer using a law enforcement database creates a list of scores of women he plots to abduct, kill and — in ways he describes in sickening detail — eat.

The federal charges against Gilberto Valle are real. But was his alleged appetite for cannibalism more than fantasy?

Federal prosecutors told a judge on Thursday that even though no one was harmed, the answer is definitely yes.

With one potential victim, Valle “took active and affirmative steps” that brought him to the brink of “kidnapping a woman, cooking her and actually eating her,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Hadassa Waxman said in arguing successfully to deny the officer bail.

Valle’s attorney countered that her client only indulged in deviant fantasies played out in fetish chat rooms and elsewhere on the Internet.

“Nothing has happened,” said the lawyer, Julia Gatto. “We may be offended. We may be alarmed. But it’s just talk, your honor.”

The shocking allegations against Valle — a six-year New York Police Department veteran, college graduate and father of an infant child — were revealed Thursday in a criminal complaint charging him with kidnapping conspiracy and unauthorized use of the database.

Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman agreed on Thursday that Gilberto Valle should be jailed without bail on charges he called “unspeakable” and “profoundly disturbing.”

Authorities say the investigation began when Valle’s estranged wife tipped authorities off to his chilling online activity.

A search of Valle’s computer found he had created records of at least 100 women with their names, addresses and photos, the complaint says, including two identified as Victim 1 and Victim 2.

One document found on his computer was titled “Abducting and Cooking (Victim 1): A Blueprint,” according to the criminal complaint. The file also had the woman’s birth date and other personal information and a list of “materials needed” — a car, chloroform and rope.

“I was thinking of tying her body onto some kind of apparatus ... cook her over low heat, keep her alive as long as possible,” Valle allegedly wrote in one exchange in July, the complaint says.

In other online conversations, investigators said, Valle talked about the mechanics of fitting the woman’s body into an oven (her legs would have to be bent), said he could make chloroform at home to knock a woman out and discussed how “tasty” one woman looked.

“Her days are numbered,” he wrote, according to the complaint.

The woman told the FBI she knew Valle and met him for lunch in July, but that’s as far as it went.

The complaint alleges that in February, Valle negotiated to kidnap another woman — Victim 2 — for someone else, writing, “$5,000 and she’s all yours.”

He told the buyer he was aspiring to be a professional kidnapper, authorities said.

“I think I would rather not get involved in the rape,” according to the complaint. “You paid for her. She is all yours, and I don’t want to be tempted the next time I abduct a girl.”

It says he added: “I will really get off on knocking her out, tying up her hands and bare feet and gagging her. Then she will be stuffed into a large piece of luggage and wheeled out to my van.”

Cellphone data revealed that Valle made calls on the block where the woman lives, the complaint says. An FBI agent interviewed the woman, who told them that she didn’t know him well and he was never in her home.

———
Associated Press writers Colleen Long and Meghan Barr in New York and researcher Barbara Sambriski contributed to this report.
 







 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(6)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Advsurfsail wrote:
Question authority!
on October 26,2012 | 06:12AM
loquaciousone wrote:
How did this loony tune get through the vetting process?
on October 26,2012 | 08:48AM
false wrote:
Psychopaths are experts at appearing normal. Until they're not.
on October 26,2012 | 09:08AM
Compassionate_Cat wrote:
You are so right, that should be the headline. People really think that what they see on TV about bad people looking bad is true. Not one evil person would get away with anything if their looks gave them away!!!
on October 26,2012 | 11:13AM
daniwitz13 wrote:
This is pure freedom of speech and EXPRESSION. Everyone has the RIGHT to fantasize and write horror stories like Steven King. The Supreme Court has ruled that no matter how gross and disgusting, it is free speech. This Judge is wrong to say that because his rants are disgustingly disturbing that he should be jailed. Then jail Steven King (the horror book writer) What if he is relating what he dreamed at some time? Our Laws are more spooky than he is. Jailed for dreams, fantasies, thoughts and imaginations. I would love to defend him in Court. This is a good opportunity to haul-in our runaway Laws and enforcement, plus Courts, plus Prosecutors that assume thinking about something is the SAME as doing it. Yes, he "might" have use Police data, but data is available to everyone. To say he at one time followed a victim is specious because that is part and partial of Police work. Cruising the streets in his car could then be said that he was stalking someone. The Police can tie one in to anything innocuous and make it incriminating. Names with birthdays and addresses can be gotten on Facebook and the internet everyday of the week. If one writes it down, that's planning. More of it, is plotting. Putting another person in one's story is conspiring. Did ANYTHING HAPPEN? Of course not, but what has that got to do with putting someone in jail. Duh! Pity..
on October 26,2012 | 10:35AM
Compassionate_Cat wrote:
An evil act begins with just the thought. Talking about it supplies the courage to then act. This woman who reported it is a hero! It was only a matter of time as he is feeling accepted for having shared his thoughts that he would act on them. If you had ever been victimized or knew about victimization you would know better. Art, on the other hand is aesthetic, creates positive energy to be shared and enjoyed, while negative energy is created with deviant anti social behavior resulting for the creation of evil.
on October 26,2012 | 11:17AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News