POSTED: 6:56 a.m. HST, Oct 11, 2010
LAST UPDATED: 7:42 a.m. HST, Oct 11, 2010
LOS ANGELES — Concerns over firefighting costs slowed the U.S. Forest Service's initial response to last year's deadly 250-square-mile Southern California wildfire that killed two firefighters and destroyed 89 homes, federal investigators said in a report.
A review by the Agriculture Department, which runs the Forest Service, cites a letter before the Station Fire instructing managers to hold down costs and limit requests for crews, aircraft and equipment from state and local agencies.
"The decision on the Station fire to initially order only federal personnel delayed arrival of critical resources," according to the "Large Cost Fire Review" obtained by the Los Angeles Times.
Forest Service officials have insisted for a year that cost concerns never impeded the response. The fire broke out in Angeles National Forest on Aug. 26, 2009, and raged untamed for more than a month.
The report was prepared for Tuesday's planned panel discussion in Pasadena on Station Fire strategy, which will be led by U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Glendale.
Tom Harbour, head of fire and aviation for the Forest Service, said he was unaware of specific findings in the report but suggested the conclusion about firefighting costs could be erroneous. All orders for crews, equipment and aircraft were filled during the first two days of the fire, he said.
The Agriculture Department review also said the Forest Service decided to concentrate on protecting homes and the communications towers and observatory on Mount Wilson, rather than staging a sustained direct assault on the backcountry front spreading into Angeles National Forest.
Former Forest Service officials describe the review as a "smoking gun" that exposes flawed tactics employed early in the fire. The Forest Service should have mounted a swift and unrelenting effort to stop the blaze on all fronts, they said.
Don Feser, former fire chief for Angeles National Forest, said the inquiry indicates that the officials who led the attack "allowed the fire to run."
"No action was taken in terms of aggressive perimeter control," he said.
Troy Kurth, the agency's former fire prevention officer for California, said firefighters could have kept the blaze from exploding into the backcountry. Instead, "they let it burn one of the most valuable watersheds in the world," he said.