Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 17, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 15 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

U.S. formally ends Iraq war

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 07:28 a.m. HST, Dec 15, 2011


BAGHDAD >> There was no "Mission Accomplished" banner. No victory parade down the center of this capital scarred and rearranged by nearly nine years of war. No crowds of cheering Iraqis grateful for liberation from Saddam Hussein.

Instead, the U.S. military officially declared an end to its mission in Iraq on Thursday with a businesslike closing ceremony behind blast walls in a fortified compound at Baghdad airport. The flag used by U.S. forces in Iraq was lowered and boxed up in a 45-minute ceremony. No senior Iraqi political figures attended.

With that, and brief words from top American officials who flew in under tight security still necessary because of the ongoing violence in Iraq, the U.S. drew the curtain on a war that left 4,500 Americans and more than 100,000 Iraqis dead.

The conflict also left another 32,000 Americans and far more Iraqis wounded, drained more than $800 billion from America's treasury and soured a majority of Americans on a war many initially supported as a just extension of the fight against terrorism after the 9/11 attacks.

As the last troops withdraw from Iraq, they leave behind a nation free of Saddam's tyranny but fractured by violence and fearful of the future. Bombings and gun battles are still common. And experts are concerned about the Iraqi security forces' ability to defend the nation against foreign threats.

"You will leave with great pride — lasting pride," Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told the troops seated in front of a small domed building in the airport complex. "Secure in knowing that your sacrifice has helped the Iraqi people to begin a new chapter in history."

Many Iraqis, however, are uncertain of how that chapter will unfold. Their relief at the end of Saddam, who was hanged on the last day of 2006, was tempered by a long and vicious war that was launched to find non-existent weapons of mass destruction and nearly plunged the nation into full-scale sectarian civil war.

"With this withdrawal, the Americans are leaving behind a destroyed country," said Mariam Khazim, a Shiite whose father was killed when a mortar shell struck his home in Sadr City. "The Americans did not leave modern schools or big factories behind them. Instead, they left thousands of widows and orphans. The Americans did not leave a free people and country behind them, in fact they left a ruined country and a divided nation."

Some Iraqis celebrated the exit of what they called American occupiers, neither invited not welcome in a proud country.

"The American ceremony represents the failure of the U.S. occupation of Iraq due to the great resistance of the Iraqi people," said lawmaker Amir al-Kinani, a member of the political coalition loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Others said that while grateful for U.S. help ousting Saddam, the war went on too long. A majority of Americans would agree, according to opinion polls.

The low-key nature of the ceremony stood in sharp contrast to the high octane start of the war, which began before dawn on March 20, 2003, with an airstrike in southern Baghdad where Saddam was believed to be hiding. U.S. and allied ground forces then stormed across the featureless Kuwaiti desert, accompanied by reporters, photographers and television crews embedded with the troops.

The final few thousand U.S. troops will leave Iraq in orderly caravans and tightly scheduled flights.

The ceremony at Baghdad International Airport also featured remarks from Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Lloyd Austin, the top U.S. commander in Iraq.

Austin led the massive logistical challenge of shuttering hundreds of bases and combat outposts, and methodically moving more than 50,000 U.S. troops and their equipment out of Iraq over the last year — while still conducting training, security assistance and counterterrorism battles.

The war "tested our military's strength and our ability to adapt and evolve," he said, noting the development of the new counterinsurgency doctrine.

As of Thursday, there were two U.S. bases and about 4,000 U.S. troops in Iraq — a dramatic drop from the roughly 500 military installations and as many as 170,000 troops during the surge ordered by President George W. Bush in 2007, when violence and raging sectarianism gripped the country. All U.S. troops are slated to be out of Iraq by the end of the year, but officials are likely to meet that goal a bit before then.

The total U.S. departure is a bit earlier than initially planned, and military leaders worry that it is a bit premature for the still maturing Iraqi security forces, who face continuing struggles to develop the logistics, air operations, surveillance and intelligence-sharing capabilities they will need in what has long been a difficult region.

Despite President Barack Obama's earlier contention that all American troops would be home for Christmas, at least 4,000 forces will remain in Kuwait for some months. The troops will be able to help finalize the move out of Iraq, but could also be used as a quick reaction force if needed.

Despite the war's toll and unpopularity, Panetta said earlier this week, it "has not been in vain."

During a stop in Afghanistan, Panetta described the Iraq mission as "making that country sovereign and independent and able to govern and secure itself."

That, he said, is "a tribute to everybody — everybody who fought in that war, everybody who spilled blood in that war, everybody who was dedicated to making sure we could achieve that mission."

Iraqi citizens offered a more pessimistic assessment. "The Americans are leaving behind them a destroyed country," said Mariam Khazim of Sadr City. "The Americans did not leave modern schools or big factories behind them. Instead, they left thousands of widows and orphans."

The Iraq Body Count website says more than 100,000 Iraqis have been killed since the U.S. invasion. The vast majority were civilians.

Panetta echoed President Barack Obama's promise that the U.S. plans to keep a robust diplomatic presence in Iraq, foster a deep and lasting relationship with the nation and maintain a strong military force in the region.

U.S. officials were unable to reach an agreement with the Iraqis on legal issues and troop immunity that would have allowed a small training and counterterrorism force to remain. U.S. defense officials said they expect there will be no movement on that issue until sometime next year.

Obama met in Washington with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki earlier this week, vowing to remain committed to Iraq as the two countries struggle to define their new relationship. Ending the war was an early goal of the Obama administration, and Thursday's ceremony will allow the president to fulfill a crucial campaign promise during a politically opportune time. The 2012 presidential race is roiling and Republicans are in a ferocious battle to determine who will face off against Obama in the election.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 15 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(15)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
KeithHaugen wrote:
Mixed emotions today... I'm happy to see the Bush War in Iraq winding down, but can't help but think about how it started. After the Saudis attacked us on 9/11, GWBush retaliated by attacking, invading,occupying the wrong country,and it cost us dearly, in lives lost and dollars thrown away. He and Cheney have still not been charged with war crimes, not told to pay us back for the cost of that unnecessary war.
on December 15,2011 | 04:55AM
kainalu wrote:
I agree. You would think there would have been a big celebration today. At least as one as big as when we went into these wars.
on December 15,2011 | 06:11AM
kainalu wrote:
I agree. You would have thought there would be a national celebration with today's news, at least one comparable to how the nation felt when we went into these wars.
on December 15,2011 | 06:35AM
1local wrote:
Obama and the Hawaii Congressional representatives (inouye, Akaka, Hirono, Abercrombie, and Hanabusa were against the US being in Iraq and did Not support the campaign. Now they are more than willing to take the credit. Politicians in action. Can't wait to see the $Billions in Rail funding the four in Congress promised (inouye, Akaka, Hirono, Hanabusa) will actually come to Honolulu...Hanabusa has been able to transfer the look of District 1 to appear just like her former Waianae - homeless all encamped on the streets.
on December 15,2011 | 05:02AM
toomuchpilikia wrote:
This is pure polictics plain and simple. OB1 has ticked off many Dems for staying in the war and adding to it! He now needs your vote. So...if you believe in bail-outs, broken promises, big goverment, and we will pay for it later attitude, and of course a mesiah type of orator, vote for OB1!
on December 15,2011 | 05:18AM
al_kiqaeda wrote:
It wouldn't be so bad if they paid us for all the losses IN OIL.
on December 15,2011 | 06:24AM
livinginhawaii wrote:
I was under the misguided impression that they were to pay us back in oil and that they had a ton of it to pay back every penny spent along with the cost of benefits to all the families who sacrificed. Someone needs to be held accountable and this should be the past President and Congress for not insisting. The current President and Congress still has an opportunity to show some strength here otherwise they should be accountable as well...
on December 15,2011 | 07:35AM
residenttaxpayer wrote:
While I'm thankful that this war is over for the U.S...I think Iraq will descend into further civil war as more of the insurgents will try to gain power as the country is without our military protection. The real war is hasn't begun yet.
on December 15,2011 | 07:04AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
So, did we wine the war, Daddy? Did we win?
on December 15,2011 | 07:09AM
Bully wrote:
Was it worh it? 800 billion dollars, 4000 americans dead, our economy is in a shambles and oil prices are higher then ever. thanks George Bush.
on December 15,2011 | 07:41AM
Kuniarr wrote:
Intelligence gathering is like a "sixth" sense the US and other countries need to guard national security. That is why we have spy satellites and now drones to spy on other countries. A country, can, however, use intelligence gathering to deceive the enemy. This was used so successfully in WWII when the Allied created dummies and fake transmissions over the wire and the airwavs to create the impression that the Allies were going to invade France at Pas de Calais. The deception was so complete that when the Allies invaded France at Normandy, the Germans withheld panzer armies from Pas de Calais so convinced that Normandy was just a diversion. Iraq did the same thing against the West, particularly the US when Iraq thru deception so convinced the US and the British that Iraq had WMD. Saddam used this deception to avoid an invasion by Iran after Iraq had been weakened by the attack of the Allies in the liberation of Kuwait. Deception was completed with Iraq kicking out UN inspectors. Deception was so complete that today almost everyone still thinks that Bush was the one that deceived the US concerning Iraq having WMD. Rail is another example of deception. Think how Traffic congestion was used to justify Rail. Think how a so-called independent panel was going to decide on technology to use supposedly to address traffic congestion. Which is why Panos Prevedorous was included among the panelist.
on December 15,2011 | 09:19AM
chryw8 wrote:
not happy with obama--he should have gone after war criminals dubya and slick dick cheney for diverting attention from the real enemy. shame on the us (but not me) for re-electing these thugs.
on December 15,2011 | 10:00AM
Beaglebagels wrote:
One sentence sums this all up. "No senior Iraqi political officials attended." I don't see how this war could have gone much worse.
on December 15,2011 | 06:14PM
Notawannabe wrote:
Thank God! We finally have an end to this needless and expensive war.
on December 15,2011 | 07:32PM
HD36 wrote:
Next up Iran! They might have a nuclear missle, but Israel has 300. But we must protect Israel right? Do we have a treaty with them? They don't even want or need or help. Ron Paul 2012
on December 15,2011 | 08:31PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News