Quantcast
  

Wednesday, April 23, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Warming will speed damage to low-lying Pacific isles, study finds

By Associated Press

POSTED:



Low-lying atolls in the Pacific Ocean will likely be inundated by seawater sooner than previously anticipated as the planet warms, a new study by the U.S. Geological Survey suggests.

Researchers studied Midway Atoll and Laysan Island in the Papahanau­mokuakea Marine National Monument for their report, and demonstrate the problems rising sea level pose for seabirds, Hawaiian monk seals, green sea turtles and other wildlife that live there.

But both places have landforms and coastal features common to many islands in the Pacific, however, and scientists say the findings are also important for people who live in the Marshall Islands, Micronesia and other low-lying Pacific island groups.

Earlier research suggested the atolls would remain above sea level for the next 50 to 150 years, research oceanographer Curt Storlazzi of the USGS Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center said in a news release Thursday. But a model accounting for storm wind and wave action suggests rising sea levels will affect the islands sooner.

"By taking wave-driven processes into account, we forecast that many of the atolls will be inundated, contaminating freshwater supplies and thus making the islands uninhabitable, much sooner," Storlazzi said. The study didn't give specific dates.

The new modeling method forecasts at least twice as much land will be inundated on Midway and Laysan compared with earlier research.

The USGS says the models offer tools to forecast where salt water might damage agricultural land and contaminate groundwater.






 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(4)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Dolphin743 wrote:
I think it's time to stop the automatic process of turning around a press release about a study into a "news" article. This whole article does nothing except report a prediction about the future that is slightly different than others without providing any background about how that conclusion was reached or even any specifics about the predictions. In other words, it's basically gossip. Does anyone at the SA have any scientific background?
on April 12,2013 | 09:10AM
Hapa_Haole_Boy wrote:
Good point Dolphin. SA should seriously take this into consideration.
on April 12,2013 | 12:19PM
st1d wrote:
50 - 150 years sounds about right. that way, if it doesn't happen most of us will be dead anyway and the prophets will have reaped their profits from fundings of bias studies.
on April 12,2013 | 01:34PM
rigormortis wrote:
Thousands will die because they couldn't outrun or move fast enough from the rising waters; one inch every 100 years, scientists predict.
on April 12,2013 | 11:39PM
IN OTHER NEWS