Wednesday, July 23, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Measures spurred by molasses leak fail at Capitol

By Cathy Bussewitz

LAST UPDATED: 07:13 a.m. HST, May 09, 2014

A massive molasses spill in Honolulu Harbor last fall led Hawaii lawmakers to introduce legislation designed to prevent a repeat disaster.

But the proposals they crafted failed to survive the 2014 legislative session.

Three bills were introduced in the Hawaii House, and another two were proposed in the Senate. But all of those measures died in the Senate at various stages, according to the Legislature's website.

The spill in September killed more than 26,000 fish and other marine creatures when about 1,400 tons of molasses dumped into the harbor. It had oozed from a section of pipe that was thought to be sealed off.

One of the measures, House Bill 2621, aimed to make government agencies and contractors report issues quickly by creating a maximum time limit for alerting authorities to problems. It also would have required government agencies and contractors to cooperate in investigations. It passed the House, but it never got a committee hearing in the Senate.

Another bill, HB 2622, proposed to take money collected from fines imposed on those that violate marine life conservation rules. That money would then be spent on shoring up conservation efforts and protecting the health of coral reefs. It also passed the House but didn't get a hearing in the Senate. A companion bill, Senate Bill 3017, never made it to a committee hearing.

The proposal that made it the furthest -- HB 2620 -- would have required the University of Hawaii to update a report laying out the state's emergency response to spills. The university had done such a report in 1996, but it has not been updated, lawmakers said. That bill passed both chambers, but they couldn't agree on amendments, so the proposal died in a conference committee right before a deadline. Its companion bill, SB 3016, also stalled in the Senate.

Rep. Chris Lee (D, Kailua-Lanikai-Waimanalo) and Sen. Mike Gabbard (D, Kapolei-Makakilo), who introduced the bills, did not immediately return phone calls for comment.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
whs1966 wrote:
The key questions is which companies lobbied to kill these bills.
on May 9,2014 | 05:09AM
inverse wrote:
the ones with the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
on May 9,2014 | 01:57PM
Skyler wrote:
Even bigger question - Who did they lobby that worked to kill the bills?
on May 10,2014 | 12:03AM
soundofreason wrote:
Don't need NEW measures. Need the ones we already have, enforced.
on May 9,2014 | 07:31AM
peanutgallery wrote:
and Matson got to raise its rates, again.
on May 9,2014 | 08:32AM
frontman wrote:
Don't u just love those democrats................ looking out for their donations before the oceans of Hawaii. Hope and change................ Hawaii will never change.
on May 9,2014 | 10:14AM
South76 wrote:
I guess we'll have to wait for another major spill disaster before anything gets done regarding this issue.
on May 9,2014 | 12:03PM
alohacharlie wrote:
Can you imagine how big the reduction would have been in what Matson pays, sorry, donates, to these elected officials if any of these bill had passed. How much is "too much now" to "0" if they had passed?
on May 9,2014 | 12:12PM
serious wrote:
Same reason for the maintenance of the Jones Act.
on May 9,2014 | 06:40PM
false wrote:
Now why could those bills possibly die? LOL
on May 9,2014 | 12:42PM
lee1957 wrote:
Lawmakers bought off by big molasses!
on May 9,2014 | 03:09PM
mcc wrote:
The 2014 Legislature failed.
on May 9,2014 | 06:14PM
harley1 wrote:
Failed? The LEG wouldn't know success even if it bit them on the okole.
on May 9,2014 | 07:48PM
harley1 wrote:
Failed? The LEG wouldn't know success even if it bit them you know where. And don't mention what's behind you!
on May 9,2014 | 07:52PM
Latest News/Updates