Quantcast
  

Thursday, September 18, 2014         

ISLAND VOICES


TO ACCESS SUBSCRIBER CONTENT:
Current Print Subscribers
ACTIVATE account
- OR -
LOGIN or SUBSCRIBE
for full digital access

Turtle Bay should go back and do it right

By Gil Riviere

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Dec 15, 2013

~~<p>The city Department of Planning and Permitting (DPP) should have rejected Turtle Bay Resort's supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) because it fails to accurately report the potential impacts of the proposed resort expansion.</p>
<p>Rather than follow the law and compare potential impacts against the &quot;no action alternative,&quot; Turtle Bay specifically rejected and refused to study that alternative in the draft SEIS.</p>
~~

The city Department of Planning and Permitting (DPP) should have rejected Turtle Bay Resort's supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) because it fails to accurately report the potential impacts of the proposed resort expansion.

Rather than follow the law and compare potential impacts against the "no action alternative," Turtle Bay specifically rejected and refused to study that alternative in the draft SEIS. Login for more...



Login or sign up below for the complete story

Print Subscribers
ACTIVATION
Current print subscribers, activate your premium content account for unlimited online access & commenting
New Subscribers
Find subscription offers in your area and choose the package that suits your reading preferences.

14-DAY PASS
14 day premium online access and commenting ability on StarAdvertiser.com