Monday, July 21, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Notre Dame defends actions

By Associated Press


SOUTH BEND, Ind. >> Top administrators at Notre Dame decided within hours of hearing about the Manti Te’o dead girlfriend hoax that it did not involve a crime and within two days had concluded there was no NCAA violation, according to a letter sent by the university president to board of trustee members on Friday.

The Rev. John Jenkins told trustees that despite “the unrelenting scrutiny of hundreds of journalists and countless others — and repeated attempts by some to create a different impression— no facts relating to the hoax have been at odds with what Manti told us” on Dec. 27-28.

The letter was obtained Friday by the Associated Press from a university official who provided it on condition of anonymity because the private school’s internal workings are confidential.

The eight-page document, including a four-page letter from Jenkins and a four-page outline of how Notre Dame handled the hoax, is both a defense and an explanation of the school’s actions.

“We did our best to get to the truth in extraordinary circumstances, be good stewards of the interests of the university and its good name and — as we do in all things — to make the well-being of our students one of our very highest priorities,” Jenkins concluded in his letter.

Some of the timeline Notre Dame outlined is well known, including that its star linebacker disclosed the scam to his coaches the day after Christmas and it remained unknown to the public until Deadspin.com broke the story on Jan. 16, long after the Fighting Irish lost the BCS championship to Alabama on Jan. 7.

Jenkins wrote that Notre Dame officials talked in the hours after hearing from Te’o on Dec. 26 and agreed there was no indication of a crime or student conduct code violation. Athletic director Jack Swarbrick spoke with Te’o the next day, and on Dec. 28 the school concluded there were no indications of an NCAA rules violation.

The school then made moves to find out who was behind the hoax, thereby protecting Te’o and itself.

More From The Star-Advertiser

Notre Dame president defends handling of Te'o

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
allie wrote:
ND=clown school and football factory
on January 26,2013 | 08:08AM
nodaddynotthebelt wrote:
Yes, there was no crime commited. But there was an attempt to use the hoax to manipulate the voters of the Heisman Trophy by one Manti Te'o. Now, that may not be a crime but had he pulled it off, it would have been the "crime of the century in college sports". He was probably hedging on the fact that if he won the trophy and then released the information later (as he did) he would still retain the trophy because, like any award, it is subjective. It is not played for on a field but played in the minds of voters who can be swayed one way by human interest stories. And Manti played a great con game until he hit a big "offensive obstacle" in the form of Manziel.
on January 26,2013 | 09:47AM
allie wrote:
Manziel is far above the dishonest, rather silly looking Manti. They picked the right guy
on January 26,2013 | 02:49PM