- B. More than proposed (350 Votes)
- C. Provide units onsite (237 Votes)
- A. As proposed: 16 units offsite, or $2.4 million in lieu (106 Votes)
This is not a scientific poll — results reflect only the opinions of those voting.
This is not a scientific poll — results reflect only the opinions of those voting.
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.
Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
No variences period, Require onsite affordable no matter what. Obey the laws!
May end up with nothing.
Agree!
Darn baloney SA question. The real answer is not choiced: No darn variance at all!!!
I agree!!!!
Truth
I agree, that was the initial agreement!
I agree. No variances. $150K a piece is not going to provide 16 affordable units anywhere on Oahu. Why is the City Council even considering this?? They hold all the cards – unless the developer is influencing them.
Especially when maintenance fees will be nearly $1k/month
The city needs to help provide the buyers…
Stop the variances. It makes a mockery of the ordinances and planning and rules that others have had to follow.
We have the lamest local politicians money can buy
And they can be bought!
All neutered. What do you expect?
How about no variances !
Ritz Carlton are building away snuck in 2nd tower blocking ocean views, natural light & airflow. Crazy. Union better get move on or like rail -done deal with residents paying price and no benefit. How about a wing of affordable rentals with no sunset date. Why limit them?
don’t even think about it.
throw that project out the door now.