Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Friday, December 13, 2024 79° Today's Paper


Top News

Evidence of Zika’s risk to pregnant women continues to grow

ASSOCIATED PRESS

In this photo taken on Monday, Feb. 29, 2016, provided by Florida State University, Professor Hengli Tang confers with his graduate student and co-author Sarah Ogden about the next steps in their Zika virus research in Tangs lab at FSU, in Tallahassee, Fla. Tang is a lead author of a lab study that found the Zika virus infects embryonic cells that help form the brain, adding to evidence that Zika causes a serious birth defect. The new work provides experimental evidence that once the virus reaches the developing brain, it can infect and harm cells that are key for further brain development, said Tang.

WASHINGTON >> Researchers report that the Zika virus may be linked to a wider variety of “grave outcomes” for developing babies than previously reported — threats that can come at any stage of pregnancy.

The findings released Friday are preliminary results from the first study tracking pregnant women in Brazil from the time they were infected, and do not prove that Zika is to blame. But they come as separate laboratory research released Friday strengthens the case that Zika causes a serious birth defect called microcephaly — babies born with abnormally small heads — by targeting embryonic brain cells.

“It’s much more than microcephaly,” said Dr. Karin Nielsen of the University of California, Los Angeles, who led the pregnancy study with colleagues at the Fiocruz Institute in Brazil. “It seems like it can act on multiple fronts.”

The mosquito-borne virus, which is spreading in Latin America and the Caribbean, normally causes only mild symptoms, if any, in adults. But it raised alarm when Brazilian health officials reported an apparent surge in babies born with microcephaly, which can signal their brains didn’t develop properly. Reports have documented traces of the virus in the brains of affected babies who died soon after birth, and in fetal brain tissue after abortion.

The study from Brazil, reported Friday in the New England Journal of Medicine, took a closer look during pregnancy.

The study so far is tracking 88 otherwise healthy pregnant women who sought care for Zika-like symptoms at a clinic run by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation in Rio de Janiero between September and last month. Tests showed 72 were actively infected with the virus. Forty-two of the infected women, and all of the presumably non-infected ones, agreed to fetal ultrasound exams. Those ultrasounds found abnormalities in 12 of the infected women, or 29 percent. The non-infected women all had normal ultrasounds.

The exams did uncover some abnormal brain development. But they also detected two fetuses that died in utero during the last trimester; poor growth even without microcephaly; problems with the placenta; and one case that prompted an emergency C-section because of low amniotic fluid, Nielsen said.

Six live births have occurred so far. One baby has severe microcephaly. Two were born too small for gestational age, one of whom had lesions in the eyes that signal vision problems if not blindness. Two other babies had normal ultrasounds and indeed, appear healthy. The baby delivered by emergency C-section struggled initially but now also appears healthy, Nielsen said.

Importantly, the researchers linked problems to infections during each trimester of pregnancy, not just the first trimester that doctors have speculated would be the riskiest.

“Unfortunately, we still have many unanswered questions,” said Dr. Christopher M. Zahn of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. But the new findings provide “additional evidence suggesting an association between Zika virus and negative obstetrical outcomes, including birth defects and fetal demise.”

“We’re starting to build the case epidemiologically that maternal infection with this virus is linked to poor fetal outcomes,” added Dr. Sallie Permar, a specialist in maternal-fetal infections at the Duke Human Vaccine Institute.

In an unrelated study Friday, researchers found that Zika can infect embryonic cells that help form the brain, and harm them in two ways: killing some outright and damaging the ability of others to divide and grow in number.

Those cells, when healthy, help build the part of the brain that is affected in microcephaly, said Hengli Tang of Florida State University, a lead author of the work published by the journal Cell Stem Cell. But he stressed that his study does not prove that Zika causes microcephaly, nor that it works by that route. A number of other viruses are known to trigger the condition.

Researchers did not take the brain cells from embryos; they created them from stem cells obtained from other sources.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who did not participate in the research, agreed that the study doesn’t prove a link. But “it certainly adds weight to the argument,” he said.

Researchers also found that infected cells pump out more virus.

Dr. Guo-li Ming of Johns Hopkins University, another lead study author, said researchers can now explore questions like how Zika infects the cells.

Tang said he is collaborating with other labs to look for substances that will block Zika infection of cells, in hopes of eventually creating a treatment for pregnant women that reduces the risk of passing the infection to their babies.

7 responses to “Evidence of Zika’s risk to pregnant women continues to grow”

  1. taka16 says:

    Microcephaly became imminent after the Chernobyl Nuclear Incident. They are now saying it’s linked to Zika Virus? Let’s not be so naive here. Fukushima is safe. #Kaaihue4Mayor

    • Cellodad says:

      Huh? “imminent?” Not sure exactly what you’re saying here. I’m glad Fukushima is safe but not sure what this has to do with anything the article discusses. The article also doesn’t seem to take a stand one way or the other about the identity of the next mayor of Honolulu.

      (btw: Microcephaly occurred in the areas closest to Chernobyl at a rate of about 3.8/10,000 births. Rates in more distant towns were about 1.8/10,000 in a 2010 study. The results however, were “not definitive” due to the study’s lack of information about other causes such as Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Brain and spinal defects were significantly more common. There are however other causes of microcephaly and it seems there’s a link with pre-natal exposure to Zika Virus.)

      • taka16 says:

        Exposure to nuclear radiation causes microcephaly too. Simply stated. Blame Everything else bacteria viruses lack of nutrition etc. , and NOT fukushima. You might offend Japan. #Kaaihue4Mayor

  2. Racoon says:

    Zika is the new AIDS of yesteryears. Spread by mozzies AND sex. No vaccine and maybe never. Spreading fast. This might be God’s answer to the overconsumption of the earth’s natural resources, over population, rampant energy consumption and smoke, global warming, increasing deterioration of quality of life, petty politics and border disputes, general disrespect of each other and their races, etc. Add this to war, pestilence, famine, and disease. We are going to disappear. Wonder who will become the new successor? Insects? Mozzies? Cockroaches?

Leave a Reply