Family of slain Big Island musician claims police exposed his identity
COURTESY HAWAII COUNTY POLICE
Robert Keawe “Lopaka” Ryder
KAILUA-KONA » The family of a Big Island musician who was shot and killed in 2013 is suing the Hawaii Police Department over claims that it allowed his identity as a confidential informant to be released.
West Hawaii Today reports the lawsuit filed by Robert Keawe Lopaka Ryder’s family alleges he was killed by Martin Frank Booth because the department let Ryder’s identity be leaked.
Booth was sentenced to life in prison in 2014 after pleading guilty to second-degree murder in Ryder’s death.
At the time, authorities reported that Booth said the crime was in retaliation for an assault he believed Ryder had committed.
However, the lawsuit states that Ryder was killed because Booth learned that he had been acting as an informant against him.
The county denies responsibility for Ryder’s death.
9 responses to “Family of slain Big Island musician claims police exposed his identity”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
looks like the Hawaii Police Department blew this one…not surprised
very true but the island is plagued with grotesque violence, misery and crime.
Bad PR for the police department as blabber mouth and confidentiality will not be protected should you provide information to solve a crime. Poor judgement if the leak is true. Public will not cooperate with police in future for sure!
we don’t know if the allegations in this lawsuit are true … but regardless, an unfortunate side effect is that people may be discouraged from coming forward as witnesses or to report crimes … if they think the police are unable (or unwilling) to protect them.
In situations like this……..all it takes is allegations!
no we don’t but the fact that they are suing is an indication that they must have some evidence of some kind or else no attorney would take the case.
I guess the family is counting on the cops coming forward to admit they made a mistake. Good luck to that one.
unfortunately, there are many ways an informant can be exposed. the target’s suspicion can uncover discrepancies in an informant’s actions, meetings or communications. an informant’s own family members can deliberately or accidentally expose a thread that unravels the informant’s operation. exposed wires, notes or ryder’s own words may have betrayed him.
blaming a single entity as the sole source of the identity leak is difficult to prove when there are many other ways ryder’s identity as an informant may have been leaked to or determined by the target.
it would be interesting to see what evidence ryder’s family is relying on in filing this lawsuit.
Given the gravity of the allegations, I don’t think an attorney would even set foot on this case without solid evidence.